Laserfiche WebLink
Heather Kimball, Council Chair <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> County of Hawai'i <br /> December 19, 2022 <br /> Page 6 <br /> The request will not have a significant adverse impact to traditional and <br /> customary Hawaiian Rights. In view of the Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" <br /> and "Ka Paakai 0 KaAina" decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering <br /> and fishing rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural, historical, and natural <br /> resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site. <br /> • Investigation of valued resources: An Archeological Survey (AIS) of a 32-acre <br /> parcel, including the subject property, was completed by Hammatt et al. in 1987 <br /> and an archaeological field inspection (FI) report titled, Archaeological Field <br /> Inspection Letter Report for Nakoa Proposed Rezone, Kapala'alaea 2nd <br /> Ahupita'a, North Kana District, Island o Hawai'i; TMK (3) 7-7-08.-062 <br /> If <br /> (Scheffler, May 2022). <br /> • The valued cultural, historical, and natural resources found in the rezoning area: <br /> The Hammatt et al. 1987 survey identified 51 historic properties, 15 of which are <br /> located on the subject property, including a burial, a platform, six terraces, five <br /> agricultural complexes, and two previously identified sites. Two sites were <br /> assessed as significant under criterion d and were recommended for no further <br /> work and none of the sites were recommended for preservation. However, <br /> according to SHPD, the Hammatt survey does not meet current standards for an <br /> archeological inventory survey as defined in Hawaii Administrative Rules <br /> (HAR) 13-276 and SHPD requested that an archeological field inspection (FI) be <br /> conducted of the subject property to determine if undocumented historic <br /> properties exist in the project area. <br /> Subsequently, the applicant provided an FI report which identified one <br /> historic property, an agricultural complex, assessed as significant under criterion d and <br /> recommended for data recovery. Additionally, the FI report indicated that a historic house <br /> structure and auxiliary shed, both damaged by fire and cleared in 2018, and three historic <br /> graves within a burial plot have all been impacted by recent bulldozing. Based on the <br /> recommendation of the Fl, SHPD requested that an archeological inventory survey(AIS) <br /> be conducted for undisturbed portions of the project area prior to any ground disturbing <br /> activities and that an AIS report be submitted to SHPD for review and acceptance prior to <br /> initiation of any project related work. Additionally, SHPD requested that consultation <br /> associated with the encountered burials occur and be documented as part of the requested <br /> AIS, and a State Inventory of Historic Places (SIHP) Site # request be submitted for the <br /> burials. Once assigned an SIHP Site#, the burials shall be subject to burial treatment in a <br /> separate plan. <br /> In response to SHPD, the applicant requested to complete the AIS requirements <br /> after the proposed change of zone and subdivision of the subject property, allowing each <br />