Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> I <br /> t <br /> 3 <br /> I <br /> According to LIHTC Rules under Section 42 of Internal Revenue Code: (IRC§42, Low-Income Housing <br /> Credit(irs.eov) a preference is allowable for people engaged in "artistic or literary activities". <br /> Clarification of general public use requirement.A project does not fail to meet the general <br /> public use requirement solely because of occupancy restrictions or preferences that favor <br /> tenants— <br /> (A)with special needs, <br /> (B)who are members of a specified group under a Federal program or State program or <br /> policy <br /> that supports housing for such a specified group, or <br /> (C)who are involved in artistic or literary activities. <br /> Under this provision tenants can be selected by an "Artist Interview Committee" made up of local <br /> community members. Tenants who apply for the housing can be evaluated based on "The willingness <br /> and ability to contribute to a cooperative/creative environment and show a commitment to engage in <br /> the greater community." <br /> Although this provision is not exclusive to long-time residents,the above criteria would likely favor <br /> people who are active and involved in the local community. <br /> Example: Ola Ka`Illima Artspace in Kaka`ako neighborhood of Honolulu. An Artist Review Committee <br /> was used to select tenants for the recent Ola Ka 'Illima Artspace Lofts(link here),which opened in Feb. <br /> 2019 and had 72 units reserved for artists.The woman who administered the selection committee <br /> process, Naomi Chu indicated that the process was very successful and they were able to find over 25 <br /> community volunteers to help with the selection committee. <br /> Conclusion: A preference for local artists and or cultural practitioners is allowable for federally <br /> subsidized housing and does not violate the Fair Housing Act. It would be logical to assume that an <br /> artistic preference would also be allowable for any County funded housing which does not rely on <br /> federal funds since the Fair Housing Act is a federal law and rules which are in compliance at a federal <br /> level would therefore also be in compliance at lower levels of legal jurisdiction, i.e.the State or County <br /> level.This type of preference would allow a selection committee composed of local area residents to <br /> select housing members based on artistic activities,which can include expressions of the local <br /> indigenous culture. t <br /> { <br /> Summary of allowable preferences which do not violate the Fair Housing Act: <br /> a <br /> 1. County Resident Preference. <br /> 2. Neighborhood Area Preference with analysis to show it does not create a "disparate impact" <br /> 3. Length of time preference,either on a waiting list or number of years in an area. <br /> 4. Artist Preference <br /> Preference which raises concerns with the constitutional right to travel but has not yet been legally <br /> tested: <br /> 1. Durational Residency Requirement <br /> 149 <br />