Laserfiche WebLink
LAAC-30 Page 2 August 15, 2023 <br />If an issue came up, further discussion or action would need to be taken at that time. Ms. Strance <br />stated that if the initial assessment is wrong, the County would not need to provide access because <br />the law does not require the County to provide it. <br />Several inquiries were made as to sewage requirements, reasons for rezoning of this property, and if <br />community outreach was attempted. Mr. Arai and the applicant responded that there would be septic <br />systems and that the reason for this rezoning was to break up the property into smaller parcels of less <br />acreage making it easier to manage for farming and sell to family. Mr. Arai stated that they reached <br />out to approximately sixty adjoining property owners and that no response expressing concerns was <br />received. <br />Planning Program Manager Maija Jackson stated that the adjoining property was zoned industrial <br />and that there was no associated permit that requires public access. <br />Council Member Rebecca Villegas asked about why Condition "M" did not include timing <br />limitations, to which Mr. Arai stated there is a special management area use permit limit for five <br />years, and that the control and performance required is embedded in that. Ms. Villegas stated that <br />she wants it in this ordinance. <br />Chair Holeka Inaba asked Director Kern to explain why this ordinance lacked a timing condition. <br />Mr. Kern explained that municipalities have performance conditions and that this is the direction that <br />he sees this county and state going. He explained further that an SMA (Special Management Area) <br />permit is a permit and having a timing condition for that makes sense if they do not perform within <br />that time period. <br />Chair Inaba stated that we should not leave rezonings without timing limitations and that he will be <br />submitting an amendment to Condition "M" for first reading that will include a five-year timing <br />limitation. <br />Your Committee on Legislative Approvals and Acquisitions is in accord with the purpose and intent <br />of Bill No. 61, and recommends its passage on first reading. <br />wpb <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE <br />APPROVALS AN ACQUISIT ONS <br />HOLEKA GORO INABA, CHAIR <br />LAAC REPORT NO.: 30 <br />ADOPTED: SEP 2 0 2023 <br />AYES NOES ABS EX <br />EVANS <br />X <br />GALIMBA <br />X <br />INABA <br />X <br />KAGIWADA <br />X <br />KANEALI°I-KLEINFELDER <br />X <br />KIERKIEWICZ <br />X <br />KIMBALL <br />X <br />LEE LOY <br />X <br />VILLEGAS <br />X <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE <br />APPROVALS AN ACQUISIT ONS <br />HOLEKA GORO INABA, CHAIR <br />LAAC REPORT NO.: 30 <br />ADOPTED: SEP 2 0 2023 <br />