Laserfiche WebLink
Selective Comparison of Article 25 to Federal Standards <br /> Article 25, primarily designed around local funding sources, stands to gain from alignment with <br /> federal regulations in certain areas, ensuring compliance and effective management, should <br /> federal funds become available in any given year, to include as part of the grants to nonprofits. <br /> Federal Standards of grants and agreements can be found in the eCFR Title 2,which details grant <br /> management principles, agency-specific rules, and uniform audit and administrative guidelines. It <br /> underscores the necessity of local code alignment with federal standards to ensure rigorous <br /> compliance, oversight, and efficient auditing of federal funds. <br /> OCA has identified opportunities to adopt best practices and align with federal standards where <br /> applicable. Consequently, OCA suggests several improvements to enhance, clarify, and <br /> harmonize code elements with federal practices. <br /> Meaningful Feedback from Awardees <br /> While soliciting information, awardees provided meaningful feedback for enhancing the program <br /> framework. The various organizations proposed specific program improvements for the county, <br /> which we believe are noteworthy: <br /> 1. Onboard Training and Information. A recurring request from NPOs was for <br /> comprehensive onboard training and information resources to enhance their <br /> understanding of program management and align their practices with county expectations. <br /> It is worth noting that the County has already made strides in this regard by providing <br /> certain training materials and resources, which can be accessed at the following link: <br /> https://www.hawaiicounty.00v/departments/finance/budget/nonprofit-grant-forms. <br /> We commend the County for its past efforts in offering training support. Moreover, we <br /> strongly encourage the continuous refinement and expansion of such training initiatives, <br /> particularly as the program evolves and adapts. <br /> 2. Award Management System or Portal. Several NPOs noted that they typically <br /> categorize receipts by vendor, date, or purchaser, making assembling the requested <br /> materials difficult. Some organizations would prefer those receipts and other <br /> documentation to be uploaded directly to an award management system domiciled by the <br /> county and in line with their proposed budget expenditure categories. In this case, the <br /> grant packets are complete upon submission of final program reports and can be audited <br /> internally. <br /> 3. Organizations Seek Feedback. Numerous NPOs have expressed their eagerness to <br /> receive feedback regarding their performance and compliance and guidance on potential <br /> improvements. According to federal standards, the awarding agency should develop and <br /> plan programs with measurable outcomes. Presently, the County requests applicants to <br /> propose their performance metrics and subsequently permits the awarded NPOs to self- <br /> assess their performance based on these self-established measures. <br /> 2 <br />