Laserfiche WebLink
FC-170 Page 4 June 18, 2024 <br />concern was and asked if her concern was that it could be construed differently other than its plain <br />meaning. Ms. Evans explained that it is unclear if the terms can be two six-month leases and <br />month -to -month and asked if tenants who don't meet the twelve months would be disqualified if it goes <br />month -to -month. Mr. Yoshimoto confirmed. <br />Ms. Lee Loy suggested having a member from the Office of Housing available for questions and <br />recommended that the bill be held in Committee for more discussion. <br />Ms. Kimball agreed with Ms. Lee Loy that the bill should remain in the Committee and felt it still <br />needed tweaking that was essential to get this right. <br />Bill 104, as amended to Draft 4, was postponed to February 6, 2024. <br />Finance Committee Meeting of February 6, 2024 <br />Ms. Kagiwada thanked all the testifiers and stated that due to Ms. Galimba's absence, Bill 104, Draft 4, <br />will be postponed to February 20, 2024. <br />Finance Committee Meeting of February 20, 2024 <br />Ms. Kagiwada and Ms. Galimba provided an update on the bill and gave a brief summary of the <br />proposed amendment. <br />Bill 104, Draft 4, was amended with the contents of Communication 600.31, which was introduced by <br />Ms. Kagiwada, with seven "ayes," with Ms. Villegas and Mr. Kdneali`i-Kleinfelder absent. <br />Bill 104, Draft 4, as amended, was postponed to June 18, 2024. <br />Finance Committee Meeting of June 18, 2024 <br />Real Property Tax Assistant Administrator Keita Jo and Finance Director Diane Nakagawa were present <br />in the Hilo Chambers for questions. <br />Ms. Kagiwada provided an update and proposed an amendment stating the point of this bill is to create a <br />separate tax class for long-term rentals. The amendment would take out what the long-term rental rate <br />shall be and leave that up to this body to decide next May. <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz asked if a placeholder was created with no rate, what the annual revenue would look <br />like for a class without an established rate. Mr. Jo stated that part of the process would be an initial <br />discussion with the administration to establish the rate. Ms. Kierkiewicz further commented that they <br />would be establishing a program for people to sign up without knowing the rates and then hope they stay <br />in it after the rate is established. Ms. Kagiwada responded to her comments by stating that the program <br />would start in January 2026, so the rates would be set prior. Ms. Kierkiewicz noted the information to <br />be helpful and would support the amendment but is unsure about supporting the bill. <br />Ms. Kimball commented on a timing issue if the tax class started in January 2026, and further stated that <br />a rate could not be set in May 2025. Ms. Kimball provided some ideas for this potential timing issue <br />and suggested a proposed initial starting rate and not a locked -in rate. <br />Ms. Lee Loy commented in support of the amendment and urged her colleagues to think about what <br />could be solved by pushing the date back. <br />FC Report No. 170 <br />