My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1051.000 2022-2024
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2022-2024
>
COM 1051.000 2022-2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2024 4:14:18 PM
Creation date
9/18/2024 8:45:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2022-2024
Communication
1051
Point
000
Author
Mitchell D. Roth, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
LAAC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2024-10-16 2022-2024
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2022-2024\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2024-11-08 2022-2024
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2022-2024\Council
AGE LAAC 2024/10/01 (2022-2024)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2022-2024\Legislative Approvals and Acquisitions Committee (LAAC)
BIL 209 Draft 01 2022-2024
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2022-2024
REP LAAC 070 2024/10/01 2022-2024
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2022-2024\Legislative Approvals and Acquisitions Committee (LAAC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Heather Kimball, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />County of Hawaii <br />September 09, 2024 <br />Page 3 <br />ground are not suitable for commercial scale agriculture. Soils within the property are <br />identified as Puuikaaka-Lava flows complex, 10 to 20 percent slopes; permeability is rapid <br />and runoff is very high. This soil type is not suitable for cultivation. The Land Study <br />Bureaus Detailed Land Classification System identifies soils of the property as "E" or "Very <br />Poor" soil for agricultural productivity. Lastly, soils in within the subject property as <br />identified as "Other Important Agricultural Land", which include lands other than Prime or <br />Unique Agricultural Land that is also of statewide or local importance for agricultural use. <br />In this instance, the applicant seeks a zoning change to subdivide the property into <br />four lots for transfer to family members. This transfer can be beneficial as it allows the land <br />to remain within the family and family members may be more likely to engage in cooperative <br />farming practices or small-scale agricultural uses that align with their interests and <br />capabilities, preserving some level of agricultural activity on the land. Additionally, this <br />approach can provide housing opportunities for family members, supporting multi - <br />generational living arrangements that can enhance family support and community stability. <br />The Kona Community Development Plan (CDP) also identifies the property as <br />partially in the urban area and partially within the rural area. The CDP has distinct land use <br />policies for each of these areas but for both, the overarching policy is to concentrate new <br />development within existing villages. This approach aims to prevent the historical trend of <br />rural and urban sprawl resulting from subdividing agricultural lands into smaller parcels. <br />In the urban areas, the policies of the CDP strongly encourage new development <br />within compact villages along proposed primary transit routes known as Transit Oriented <br />Developments (TOD's), or as Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TND's) along <br />secondary transit routes. Infill developments, which are new developments adjacent to <br />existing urban properties, are also encouraged. Rezoning of lands that do not qualify as Infill <br />or TOD/TND developments are considered "greenfield" developments, which require an <br />amendment of the CDP before they can be approved (see Policy LU-2.8). <br />In the rural areas, the CDP policies promote new development within the existing <br />rural areas of Holualoa, Honalo, Kainaliu, Kealakekua, Captain Cook, Honaunau, <br />Napo`opo`o, Kealia and Miloli`i. While Kalaoa is not included as a rural village in the CDP, <br />possibly due to the lack of a clear commercial center or because the Kalaoa mauka area is <br />viewed as an extension of the Kona urban area rather than a distinct village and is identified <br />as a general location of a TOD. The land use polices for rural areas in the CDP are less clear <br />than those for urban area and in some cases policies directly conflict one another or do not <br />clearly indicate whether they are suggestions or requirements. For example, the following <br />sections of the Kona CDP support a rural clustered land use pattern for all lands outside the <br />rural villages (emphasis added): <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.