Laserfiche WebLink
and project developers would facilitate a more efficient permitting process. The coordinated <br />approach would reduce costs and improve approval timelines. <br />Finished Lots: While building affordable housing on finished lots was historically feasible, <br />rising construction costs and financing difficulties have made this option increasingly <br />challenging. The Ad Hoc Committee prioritizes turn -key homes but acknowledges the need for <br />diverse solutions, including finished lots, to meet affordable housing requirements. To make <br />finished lots more viable, the committee recommends expanding the affordability range to <br />120-140% of the area median income (AMI), making it more feasible for developers. <br />Additionally, exploring financial assistance programs for buyers of finished lots would help <br />ensure home construction, and extending the timeframe to build from three to five years would <br />provide buyers with sufficient time to finance, design, permit, and construct their homes. <br />Density Bonus Program: This program, though potentially valuable, remains underutilized due <br />to vague language and limited infrastructure. Revising program language to clarify guidelines <br />and incentives, and possibly relocating it to Chapter 25 (Zoning) to improve its visibility, may <br />increase its impact. Regardless of its location in the County Code, effective administration and <br />inter -agency coordination are essential for success. <br />In -Lieu Fees: In -lieu fees would provide an alternative for developers who opt not to build the <br />required affordable housing units, allowing the County to redirect these funds toward affordable <br />housing development elsewhere. The in -lieu fee would be calculated as half the affordable sales <br />prices for the unit, with adjustments based on geographic location. Two approaches are under <br />consideration to limit reliance on the in -lieu fees: <br />- Approach #1 —Projects with 50 or more units would be prohibited from using in -lieu fees <br />to fulfill their affordable housing requirement. <br />- Approach #2 — Projects with 200+ units may not use in -lieu fees, while those with <br />100-199 units could use this option to fulfill up to 50% of their obligation. <br />Clarification is needed regarding the timing of in -lieu fee payments. The Ad Hoc did not have <br />time to explore how in -Lieu fees would apply to rental projects or satisfy housing obligations for <br />industrial, commercial, or hotel/resort projects. <br />Conveyance of Land: Conveyance of land has been used as a means to satisfy affordable <br />housing requirements, and has enabled organizations like Hawaii Island Community <br />Development Corporation (HICDC) to build affordable units successfully. The Ad Hoc <br />recognizes land as a critical component to housing development and advocates for future land <br />donations to include a clear development plan and to identify an affordable housing developer to <br />ensure timely construction. <br />Real Property Tax: The Ad Hoc is exploring options for real property tax reductions or <br />temporary exemptions on projects focused on affordable housing, workforce housing, <br />