My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0618.000 2024-2026
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2024-2026
>
COM 0618.000 2024-2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2025 5:43:46 PM
Creation date
11/19/2025 9:50:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2024-2026
Communication
0618
Point
000
Author
Kehaulani M. Costa, Housing Administrator
Communications - Referred To
FC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2025-12-17 2024-2026
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2024-2026\Council
AGE FC 2025-12-02 2024-2026
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2024-2026\Finance Committee (FC)
REP FC 111 2025-12-02 2024-2026
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2024-2026\Finance Committee (FC)
RES 397 Draft 01 2024-2026
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2024-2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Categorizing expenses as Admin and Program Costs is not always clearly black and white. The <br />following distinctions apply, in accordance with Hawaii state Procurement Office —Hawaii Administrative <br />Rules Title 3 Department of Accounting and General Services Subtitle 11 Procurement Policy Board Chapter 123 Cost <br />Principles and Code of Federal Regulations 011) Title 2 Part 200.405. <br />Costs That Benefit Multiple Projects: <br />• Some costs benefit more than one project or activity (such as rent for an office used for <br />multiple programs). These costs may be allocated across projects in a way that reflects the <br />proportion of benefit each project receives. For example, if half of the office space is used <br />for one project and the other half for another, rent should be split accordingly. Such <br />proportional allocations are acceptable within either the Admin Costs or Program Costs <br />categories, as long as they reflect the actual usage by each project. Supporting <br />documentation may be required to show the breakdown of the allocation. <br />Costs Necessary to Overall Operation: <br />Some costs are necessary for the overall business or operation but may not be directly tied <br />to any one specific project (like administrative salaries). These costs can still be allocated to <br />the proposed budget within the Admin Costs section, but total Admin costs may not <br />exceed 10% of the overall awarded amount. <br />Shared Costs Between Admin and Program: <br />• It maybe allowable to allocate a portion of aline item between both Admin Costs and <br />Program Costs if the line item serves both functions, provided there is a justifiable, <br />reasonable, and documented allocation method - such as square footage, time logs, or <br />usage percentages. <br />• For example, in line with federal grant standards, staff who spend 20% of their time <br />delivering direct program services may charge 20% of their salary and fringe benefits to <br />Program Costs, with the remaining 80% attributed to Admin Costs, provided that Admin <br />costs do not exceed 10% of the total requested amount. Shared expenses —such as rent, <br />utilities, or equipment —should be allocated using equitable bases, such as square footage, <br />usage logs, or functional timekeeping. Under 2 C.F.R. § 200.405(d), direct allocation of <br />shared costs is permissible when the distribution reflects actual benefit and is consistent <br />and documented. <br />Definitions ) HHF RFGA 2025-2026 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.