Laserfiche WebLink
4._ 1 <br />Dr. Holeka Goro Inaba, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council. <br />December 22, 2025 <br />Page 3 <br />All essential utilities and services remain available to the project site. Police and <br />medical services are located nearby in Waimea, approximately 5.5 miles away. There is a <br />volunteer fire station located at the top of Waiula Drive, approximately 2 miles west <br />(makai) of the project site. The nearest manned fire and emergency services stations are <br />also in Waimea and near the South Kohala resort area, approximately 5.5 and 11.4 miles <br />away, respectively. <br />At the time the RA-2a zoning was approved, a primary dwelling could be built by <br />right and a second dwelling could have been built with the issuance of an `Ghana <br />Dwelling permit on each of the subdivided lots, thus doubling residential density. There <br />was a concern by the Planning Department and County Council at the time that this <br />increased density may contribute to a cumulative burden on existing infrastructure <br />(roadways, water, etc.), therefore Condition D was added to prohibit a second dwelling <br />unit on the property. Similar conditions were standard on most rezoning ordinances of <br />that era. <br />The applicant's justification for amending Condition D is based on recent <br />amendments to State law and the County Code, which permit ADUs within the RA <br />zoning district and on lands designated Rural by the State Land Use (SLU) system. The <br />Planning Director concurs that the intent of these legislative changes is to encourage the <br />development of additional housing units overall within Hawaii County and is therefore <br />generally supportive of amending the condition. <br />However, based on the Department's interpretation of State statute, the <br />development of ADUs is not permitted within the SLU Rural District. Pursuant to HRS <br />§46-4.8, Accessory dwelling units on residentially zoned lots; subsection (b) provides <br />that "...each county shall adopt or amend ordinances defining reasonable standards that <br />allow for the construction of at least two accessary dwelling units, or the reasonable <br />equivalent, for residential use on all residentially zoned lots. " However, subsection (i)(1) <br />clarifies that "this section shall not apply to any area outside of the urban district <br />established by Chapter 205. " Moreover, subsection (k) indicates that, ""Residentially <br />zoned lot" does not include a lot in a county zoning district that is intended for rural, low <br />density residential development, and open space preservation." As the rezone area's RA- <br />2a zoning is intended for rural, low density residential development, the ADU provision <br />does not appear applicable. <br />While the County has adopted an ADU ordinance under Bill No. 123, which <br />permits the construction of ADUs within the Residential and Agricultural (RA) zoning <br />district, this allowance applies only to properties located within the State Land Use Urban <br />District. Therefore, ADUs are not permitted within the rezone area, which lies in the <br />State Land Use Rural District. <br />