My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 552 Draft 01 2024-2026
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2024-2026
>
RES 552 Draft 01 2024-2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2026 3:44:21 PM
Creation date
4/21/2026 3:38:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2024-2026
Bill/Resolution
552
Draft
01
Introducer
Michelle Galimba, Council Member
Referred To
LAAC
Action 1
LAAC-41: Recommended adoption - 05/04/26
Action 2
Council: Adopts Res. 552-26 & LAAC-41 - 05/20/26
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
5/20/2026
Ayes
9-Galimba, Hustace, Inaba, Kagiwada, Kaneali'i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Kimball, Onishi, and Villegas
Noes
0
Absent
0
Excused
0
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2026-05-20 2024-2026
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2024-2026\Council
AGE LAAC 2026-05-04 2024-2026
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2024-2026\Legislative Approvals and Acquisitions Committee (LAAC)
COM 0865.000 2024-2026
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2024-2026
REP LAAC 041 2026-05-04 2024-2026
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2024-2026\Legislative Approvals and Acquisitions Committee (LAAC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and adaptive co -management of Kealakekua Bay which will honor traditional place -based <br />knowledge and practices. <br />The Kealakekua Bay Community Action Plan (CAP) is a document that has been <br />thoroughly developed and refined by the multi -faceted community of Kealakekua and <br />implies a strong path forward for partners that would serve as stewards of the properties <br />nominated. <br />Community support and collaboration is prevalent in the nomination of these properties <br />and their future stewardship. Partnerships have been identified, and needs have been <br />defined for appropriate collaboration and stewardship. <br />Weaknesses: <br />■ No weaknesses identified. <br />Concerns and Other Thoughts: <br />Current scoring systems for PONC nominations do not necessarily account for the <br />significance of these properties as an extension and access -point of the cultural and natural <br />areas which do not fall within its property boundaries. The significance of the extended <br />landscape and community must be understood and emphasized as part of the property <br />value and the property nomination itself must be seen as an integral part of the extended <br />lands and waters of Ka`awaloa and Kealakekua. Viewing these spaces as undeniably <br />connected and interwoven is critical to considering the extended landscape in scoring <br />processes. <br />Report by: Cayla Crivello, Vice Chair, PONC Commission <br />Photos by: Cayla Crivello, Vice Chair, PONC Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.