Laserfiche WebLink
GOEAC-134 Page 2 May 19, 2026 <br />individual. She added that this legislation won't take effect until a new Mayor is elected, therefore <br />it won't be impacting the current administration. <br />Committee Member Ashley L. Kierkiewicz said that she wanted to see an organizational chart <br />about what levels the Mayor and County Manager would be at and what the chain of command <br />would be in this scheme. She asked questions about budget and protocol on who gets what role <br />within that process, especially if there were a difference of opinion. She stated that she thinks it <br />may be a bit rushed to put on the ballot this year and asked what outreach to community may have <br />already been done. Member Kimball shared an organizational chart to help clarify the roles, and <br />discussed some different scenarios on how things could play out. She said that the language in her <br />bill are in alignment with our current budget and also include an intention that the Mayor and <br />County Manager work together to develop the budget. She agreed that this changes the role of the <br />Mayor in a significant way, and that it is more than just a "pretty face" but can help set overall <br />vision and also take some of the pressure and administrative function from that one individual. <br />Member Kimball said that she has done lots of outreach within her own community on this idea, <br />but would want to do similar outreach around the County on this to help refine the idea and answer <br />questions. <br />Committee Member Michelle M. Galimba said that she has heard feedback from members in her <br />community who have lived in counties where this was the norm and want a similar model here. <br />She added that it is important not to take our structures for granted and be motivated to figure out <br />better systems of how to do things. She said that our current systems do not incentivize long-term <br />decision making and planning, but rather short-term solutions. Member Galimba mused that this <br />probably wouldn't pass the electorate this year, and she wasn't certain that this is the best way to <br />address the structure issues that exist in our current systems, but that it was a good place to start <br />the conversation. <br />Committee Member Matt Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder asked about each agency being operated by <br />someone chosen by the County Manager and if that means they are hiring the department heads. <br />Member Kimball said "yes," and the department heads who are not mentioned within the <br />legislation would continue to be appointed by the Mayor. Member Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder brought <br />up concerns that the four Council Members and the Mayor appointing a person that they can work <br />with at that point in time and then years later it may cause some issues with future Council <br />Members or Mayors not being aligned with the County Manager. He also brought up the fact that <br />our current Mayor isn't in favor of this legislation and would veto it, Member Kaneali`i- <br />Kleinfelder inquired if they could still make the deadline to get it on the ballot. Member Kimball <br />explained that they would just barely make it for the deadlines for the ballot, and it may require a <br />special meeting to override a veto if one were to occur. <br />County Clerk Jon Henricks said that their deadline to transmit the language to the state for the <br />ballot amendments is around August 20th, therefore creating a deadline for the Council to get any <br />Charter amendments finalized by July 30th to get their proposals through. <br />Committee Member Holeka Goro Inaba questioned having the Mayor represent both themselves <br />and the Council in external affairs. He said his preference is to have the Council represent <br />themselves. Member Inaba said that he doesn't believe it doesn't give enough of an idea of what <br />GOEAC Report No. 134 <br />