Laserfiche WebLink
30 Department of Land and Natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division <br /> (August 23, 2000 Letter): <br /> "This is in response to your August 15, 2000 Memo on the subject applications <br /> "The applicant is seekmg to subdivide a 2 421 acre parcel for single-family residential <br /> use The application, prepared by Sidney Fuke, notes that the parcel was formerly <br /> cleared and used for sugar cane cultivation, and more recently for cattle grazing <br /> Based on this history of previous land use and alteration, we believe that it is highly <br /> unlikely that the parcel would contain significant historic sites We thus conclude that <br /> the proposed house construction will have `no effect' on significant historic sites " <br /> 31 Land Use Commission (August 29, 2000 Letter): <br /> " We have reviewed the subject applications forwarded by your memorandum dated <br /> August 15, 2000, and confirm that the subject site, as represented on Figure 1, is <br /> designated within the State Land Use Agricultural District <br /> "We have no further comments to offer at this time We appreciate the opportunity to <br /> cotrunent on the subject applications " <br /> 32 Department of Transportation (January 20, 2000 Memo): <br /> "Not applicable " <br /> 33 Department of Public Works: (See Exhibit B -August 31, 2000 Memo) <br /> 34 Department of Water Supply: (See Exhibit C -September 19, 2000 and <br /> October 5, 2000 Letters) <br /> <br /> 35 Fire Department: (See Exhibit D -September 13, 2000 Memo and Applicant's <br /> Response -September 27, 2000 Letter) <br /> A('ENCIES - NO RF,SPONST; <br /> 36 Department of Land and Natural Resources-Land Division, Department of Health, <br /> Department of Agriculture, and Natural Resources Soil Conservation Service <br /> PUBLIC CO1Vih1ENT$ <br /> 37 The Department has not received any written comments or objections from the general <br /> public or adjacent landowners on the subject applications <br /> -6- <br /> <br />