My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0020.024 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0020.024 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:05:42 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0020
Point
024
Author
Chris Yuen
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
PC: Refer to Council - 12/19/00 (PC 034) Presented: PC - 12/19/00
Communications - File Code
MAY
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 01/10/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Council
COM 0020.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilman James Y Arakaki <br /> December 18, 2000 <br /> Page 4 <br /> environmental law In law school, I took courses in administrative law and land use law <br /> Some people use the word "administrative" to mean something much narrower <br /> than the dictionary definitions For example, some use it to mean "the details of an <br /> organization," as in the sentence "the planning director handles administrative matters for <br /> the planning commission " Let me suggest that this kind of administrative expertise is <br /> not the most important skill to look for in a planning director. <br /> Others may use the term "administrative" to mean something like "day-to-day <br /> supervision of employees " While this is one way to show administrative experience, it is <br /> not the only way (I should mention that I have supernsed employees on a daily basis in <br /> my law business for thirteen years, on my farm for the last six years, and as a National <br /> Pazk Service interpretive naturalist ) <br /> If the Charter is construed to require three years of day-to-day supervision of <br /> employees in a planning position, there will be only a handful of "qualified" individuals <br /> on the island, primarily the former planning directors and their deputies. It would be <br /> much too restrictive to limit the eligibility in this way. I don't think that the Charter <br /> Commission or the voters thought that they were limiting the job of planning director to <br /> just ttis handful of people when the Charter was amended in 2000. <br /> This question has come up before in the State. The Charter of the City and <br /> County of Honolulu has a very sirriilar administrative experience requirement for the <br /> director of the Department of Land Utiliwtion (which is much lazger than the Hawaii <br /> County Planning Department) The qualifications of Jan Sullivan were questioned when <br /> she was appointed a few years ago. The Honolulu Corporation Counsel determined that <br /> she was qualified based upon her years as a ]and use attorney, and her service on the <br /> Hawaii Community Development Authority, a state boazd. She had not supervised <br /> planners on a day-to-day basis. <br /> This has been a long letter, probably much longer than necessary, but I wanted to make <br /> sure that the members of the Council had the same level of comfort on this question that Mayor <br /> Harry Kun had when he appointed me to this Job. I also wanted to give the Council a basis for <br /> interpreting this charter provision in the future. Agazn, I look forward to my confirmation <br /> hearing with you Tuesday, where I will be happy to address this and any other questions you may <br /> have <br /> Yours T ly, <br /> ~ ~ ~ <br /> Christopher J. en ~ <br /> <br /> CJY/tip <br /> <br /> PE0.SKOUNCIL <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.