Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> CALLI\G FORREFOR\[OFTHECOC\T1 OFHa\\ I P~},~~T1~ ~S ~ i'I 3 ~'~~tS <br /> DEP_aRT\fE\T <br /> <br /> ~\'HERE~S the~udtctan has repeatedl} found that the Hatt a FlarttxiaL l' ` tit ll•e <br /> Planning Commission hay e ~ wlated legal requaement ar; <br /> ~CHERE_aS the Supreme Court found that the Plamm~a Cnmrni>sion nr~~i~ <br /> members of the public standing to challenge a resort deg ei~~pment at ti~~l i ~ es~ <br /> ~horehne Ha~tai r ~ Haaat r Counn• Plannmy Commrm~7 tnd <br /> ~CHERE.aS the Supreme Court found that the Plannm~_ C ~annn~su•r air r <br /> tmpmperh authonzed construction of a cellular phone tots e- m t:~e a _n~ ai tl-e <br /> shoreline Curtts ~ Board of .appeals Count} of Hattart .end <br /> ~~-HER;;aS the Supreme Court found that the Planntni L`epuvnent un:. d to <br /> exempt a resort project from preparing an em tronmental a-~essnent ~_r „ e_n,,n <br /> of the \orth Iiohala Coastline ~ Counn,~f Ha~~ai i and <br /> \CHERE_~S a state ctrcurt court found that the Planning C,~inmrssmi tai • ~~er <br /> procedures m ~ranhng a permtt for the deg elopment at a 'ahz F P~ <br /> cc _ <br /> \ssoctauon t Ha~~ar'r Plannm~ Commission and <br /> «'IIEREaS a state ctrcurt court found that the Plannini C ~~nrmsstor in-. a <br /> permtt for a cellular to.. er dominating o~ er \Iaulua Gulch oen r E o,u ' Ord <br /> \\-HERE~S the State Land L'se Commission decision In ie t ~odfie~ r~ - , ~ ~ irn <br /> planning department teas not properl} protecun~ the rnte~t of ac r uli <br /> \O~~"THEREFOR BE IT RESOL\"ED TH.aT the Demerzuc Farts rr~ ,ider to <br /> reduce litigation costs and protect Ha«au•s unique natural ie~ource~ hr ,~f t to <br /> Hat~au Counn Plannms Department and the Commnston is 'ir~enth r~ <br /> !adopted b} t he Hatt au Counn Democratic Pam \I: ~ '_~'~ro i Re ~ . <br /> <br />