My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0019.000 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0019.000 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 11:50:32 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:15:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0019
Point
000
Author
Dixie Kaetsu, Finance Director, Director of Finance Stephen Yamashiro, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Council: Res. 9-01 adopted - 01/10/01 FC-5: Recommends adoption of Res. 9-01-12/19/00 (FC 34)
Communications - File Code
FND/TRF
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 01/10/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Council
AGE FC 12/19/2000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Finance Committee (FC)
REP FC 005 12/19/2000 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Finance Committee (FC)
REP FC 005 12/19/2000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Finance Committee (FC)
RES 009 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
RES 009 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the area. <br /> ALSO UERY IMPORTFINTLY the master plan indicates that the 31 acre <br /> area will NOT RE A PRFiIC, but rater a archeological, ethnobotanical SITE. <br /> This is clearly NOT a Park area and to propose picnic areas, <br /> skateboard and bike paths does NOT seem to be the intention of the <br /> plan. I n my opinion, any improvements for the area which are of a <br /> park nature and not merely aarcheological/ethnobotanical site <br /> should be abandoned. <br /> In my mind such an archeological site is not a public park and use <br /> by anyone would have to be a carefully monitored area, i.e. 24 hour <br /> security, access for public and residents only accompanied by or <br /> monitored by staff and site officials, etc. To open such an area with <br /> no monitoring, no 24 hour surveillance, etc. would seem to be inciting <br /> desecration, destruction and trashing of a seemingly important area. <br /> Not being within County, State or Federal jurisdiction, i.e. being a <br /> privately owned park, seems would make such monitoring cost <br /> prohibitive. <br /> Further, the actual physical makeup of this area, i.e. thick <br /> vegetation and seclusion make opening this area of questionable. <br /> Rccessible community park areas are by design open, clear areas, <br /> which afford easy policing and monitoring. Opening up this secluded <br /> and difficult to monitor area will only invite kids and undesirable <br /> elements a secluded spot to party, desecrate a special area, etc. <br /> The master plan indicates where bicycle and foot paths have been <br /> dedicated. These areas are NOT within this 31 acre site. The master <br /> plan indicates further, two dedicated County Parks, etc. THESE areas <br /> have not been developed yet. Wouldn't a grant to develop these <br /> facilities be more in line with what will benefit the most people. <br /> To summarize and not make this too lengthly.... Pursuant to the <br /> master plan and archeological findings contained in the master plan, <br /> and the plans indication of not a park, but rather a site: <br /> that to proceed with any grant proposal prior to further complete <br /> <br /> study of the area, mapping of sites, determining if there are any <br /> <br /> burial caves within the area, checking with any and all concerned <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.