Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION TO SITE IN DISCUSSION <br /> The area being discussed in this report is the 31-acre unimproved expanse located in the center of <br /> Hawaiian Paradise Park which has remained undeveloped and unroaded. Ethnobotanical beauty, ar- <br /> chaeological significance and habitat to many indigenous species of animalia according to reports and <br /> evidence are abundant ~•ithin this area. This report is a summation and analysis of actual application of <br /> the written or otherwise documented information available to the analyst (Index of Reports, page), in <br /> particular the 1997 Master Plan for the subdivision currently on file with the County Planning Dept. It is <br /> assumed that property owner input and outside expertise were acquired at that time for the land usage. <br /> The area in question is also adjacent to one of m}• properties within this subdivision where I have a house <br /> with possible extensions of this archaeological site on the property. This also allows me a firsthand <br /> familiarity with the site in question. <br /> PARK COMMITTEE COMPOSITION/MASTER PLAN <br /> HPP is a subdivision slated to have more than "30,000 residents in the next 25 years," (about 10 <br /> percent per year) according to the Master Plan. On the other hand, an ,B.merican subdivision containing <br /> its own lo~~?~land area of undeveloped native rainforest sheltering possible prehistoric ruins deserving of <br /> further research and inventory (Rosendahl, 1985), as well as the observed nesting areas of native species <br /> <br /> of our shy, feathered ohana members (also mentioned on page 4 of the Master Plan) is truly a global <br /> rarity°. The presence of indigenous wildlife, flora and fauna was also upheld in the Master Plan. Ho~~• to <br /> <br /> combine all these factors, in complying with the Master Plan, as well as actively seekingrenewed pron- <br /> ertkowner input. and recruiting appropriately timed outside expertise seems to be what should be cur- <br /> <br /> rentlyoccurring in commitee. <br /> ASPHALT TIIROUGIi SITE, NOT PARK <br /> According to the Master Plan, there are at least ttvo undeveloped 4-acre County Parks slated for <br /> the subdivision (which means that the County would be responsible for the costs and maintenance of <br /> these areas), as «•ell as the 40-acre Community Center grounds. Another 20-acre park is also slated at <br /> 15th avenue. The 31-acre section in discussion is designated in the 1997 Master Plan as being an "ethno- <br /> botanical garden and archaeological site (not ~arsk, two very different words, according to a dictionary of <br /> the English language). Also, there are several precise plans and designations setting aside specific areas <br /> for pedestrian/bicycle paths mentioned in the Master Plan. Item #4, page 15-16 clearly indicates that "it <br /> is intended that Railroad Avenue become limited to bicycles, pedestrians and electric vehicles." Also, on <br /> page 21 it states "the permeter of Paradise Park and Railroad Avenue are the only mapped out areas that <br /> we have dedicated to pedestrian walkways and bicycle paths." is now being reslated/redesigned by a <br /> committee whose chairperson's number one dream for the place is pave a 5-foot wide asphalt path in an <br /> oval configuration across each of the currently individually subdivided lots of this parcel not more than <br /> 100 feet or so from the back door of each property owner adjacent to that area. <br /> CONFLICT OF MASTER PLANS, CONFLICT ~VITII CURRENT TERRAIN <br /> The current plan of Luchau's being placed as part of a $200,000 Community Plot Ptan grant <br /> proposal seems to conflict with the above portions of the Master Plan quoted. Requesting government <br /> funding fora pr~ect which so clearly does not complti• with the Master Plan makes the time, effort and <br /> and vrot~erty owner input that went into the Master Flan redundant. It implies "wh}- have a Master Plan <br /> when we can change it in committee." It is unclear at this time how this current rough plan came into <br /> existence, however, it is clear that, as it stands with the committee chair, it does not comply with resident <br /> intentions laid out within the Master Plan. In reasoning these conflicts, other factors were brought into <br /> study which must also be mentioned. <br /> <br />