COM 0034.005 2000-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

JU~+OB 'S7 .5 57 C CHRIS'ENSEN Despite ropeated request by cthuns for the Public Works Deparim .e the law with regard to the Hokulia spill, it refused to do so It took four individunl~ artisuit to halt the illegal activity And only after an independent~udge issued etemp- r~o did the developer admit fruit. The county could have acted According to Uie September 18 manic , ~obcn Yanabu from Kino Emler via Galen Kuba "Our staff is venfying and have ; hit some of the EC;P measures (silt Ceaces) are not to place above the golf course on t.. on grading." The county Public Works Department specrfically found that Ero I Measures Utat wen promised sod are required --were not implemented of itsctf, is a vtolaUon of the law Why the Public Works Department refused to prop ,olation, which contnbuted to smothenng thousands of yards of coral, boggles my m~ It is not sufficient, as the former Public Works Department told mc, ~~Cfictals are now being cooperative. They violated promises made repeatedly to the c • n.i to government agennes. What kind of message is sent to contractors through r ~ lv hen the county refuses to tyke action agiunst the developers It lets contractors knot a;i deatroy Irving corals and foul class AA waters with impunity It lets them ! r• =can break their promises and violate their penntt conditions without worry b.c consequence will be that they wQl be made to promise to fulfill their poor pr • ' n 1 have been told that there is another coastal development~ust north ~ u ith sirtvlarly definent erosion coattol measures. Please ask the new Chief Frtgin- n : staff inspect all development within a toile of the coasUinc to ensure sinct compl~~ • - grading ordinance AIVD the terms of ell Special Management Area penri~ Thank you for the opportunity to testify