My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0027.027 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0027.027 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:32:27 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:22:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0027
Point
027
Author
Anonymous - Volcano
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Communications - File Code
ZNG/PN
Document Relationships
BIL 195 Draft 01 1998-2000
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1998-2000
BIL 195 Draft 04 1998-2000
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1998-2000
COM 0027.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2/2~i01 i~ 3 20 PM p 2/2 <br /> Where will the sewage be disposed How will it be treated <br /> SettinRprecedenis <br /> The revised bill practically prorruses that the county will rezone the other parcel That's <br /> bad planning and bad policy <br /> Few Benefits <br /> Several temporary. construction fobs will be created But no permanent fobs will be <br /> created Retail operations of this nature do not create fobs They take~obs from elsewhere <br /> <br /> Think about it The money that will 6e spent at the new Shipman facility is not new money, it is <br /> simply money [hat is spent elsewhere now <br /> A better wav <br /> 4~-e could be bwlding a livable community where people can walk to the grocery store <br /> <br /> and the park Instead, we are monng blindly forward building automobile-centnc malls <br /> Shipman owns plenty of land around Kea au proper that could be developed appropnately <br /> Instead of developing a parcel of land that is directly adjacent to Kea au (which Shipman owns), <br /> <br /> this protect is proposed a good distance from Kea'au proper This parcel should not be <br /> developed at least for another few decades <br /> 'fhe county doesn't owe Shiprnan anything Why grant this zoning? Shipman has no <br /> vested nghts to this zone change R'hat purpose does bad planning sen•e~ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.