My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0200.003 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0200.003 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:12:48 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:44:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0200
Point
003
Author
Ted H.S. Hong, Assistant Corporation Cousel
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented: FC - 5/8/97
Communications - File Code
POS
Document Relationships
BIL 083 Draft 01 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
COM 0200.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Honorable Aazon S. Y Chung <br /> May 6, 1997 <br /> Page 3 <br /> nearly 100%. This tlgure does not include the number of lawsuits and claims <br /> which have been filed against the County. <br /> C. Other County Employees have Received Salary Increases of Approximately 30%~ <br /> Since fiscal Year 1989 - 1990, to the present, the following bargaining units for <br /> County employees have received the following average salary increases: <br /> • Unit I Blue Collar Still negotiating FY 95-96 & 96-97. <br /> • Unit 2 Blue Collar Supervisors 29.78% <br /> • Unit 3 White Collar -Clerical 35.25% <br /> • Unit 4 White Collar. Supervisors 35.25% <br /> • Unit 11 Firefighters 32.20% <br /> • Unit 12 Police 37.00% <br /> • Unit 13 Professional & Scientific 32.10% <br /> • Excluded Management 33.10% <br /> Civil servants and excluded management positions have had salary increases averaging 30% in <br /> <br /> the past seven years, while the attorneys have received nothing. This is especially disheartening <br /> when the Excluded Management positions earn more than Department Directors and their raises <br /> are automatically tied to the civil servants' raises. <br /> <br /> 4 Misconceptions About the Proposed Amendment: <br /> <br /> There are two Fundamental misconceptions about this proposed amendment. <br /> <br /> It has been expressed that this amendment gives the appointing authority too much discretion in <br /> <br /> determining salary increases. This is an exaggeration since under the present Pay Grade and step <br /> system, the appointing authority already has the authority to award a salary increase or raise. <br /> <br /> This amendment only changes the amount that can be awarded. This proposed amendment will <br /> <br /> allow the appointing authority to determine who and by what amount an attorney's salary can be <br /> <br /> raised given the savings in the department's budget. <br /> <br /> The other misconception is that this amendment will be applied automatically, across the board <br /> <br /> to all attorneys. This amendment sets a salary cap or ceiling of no more than ninety percent <br /> (90%) and a minimum of fifry percent (50%) of the appointing authority's salary. Even if this <br /> amendment passes, no salaries can or will change until the appointing authority decides to make <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.