My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0102.010 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0102.010 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 4:52:34 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0102
Point
010
Author
Roger Christie, Cannabis Sacrament Minister
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Communications - File Code
POL
Document Relationships
RES 046 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'ir. James Y. Arakaki <br /> July 17, 2000 <br /> Page 2 <br /> You further informed us that (1) you must personally advance <br /> all costs for any defense of an impeachment petition because the <br /> corporation counsel is barred by a provision in your County <br /> Charter from representing an official in an impeachment <br /> proceeding; (2) you have no assurances that you will be <br /> reimbursed by the County for these expenses if you successfully <br /> defend the impeachment petition; and (3) there may be ethical <br /> conflicts in seeking any reimburse:ment for your personal expense <br /> because the six council members who would potentially seek <br /> reimbursement themselves constitute part of the full Council that <br /> must formally approve any reimbursement request. <br /> Thus, you wanted the State Attorney General to give you a <br /> written opinion concluding, first, that the Council has fully <br /> complied with Section 3-16 of the County Charter and, second, the <br /> council members are entitled to reimbursement from the Council <br /> for all out of pocket legal expense they advance in defense of an <br /> impeachment petition, notwithstanding a Charter provision which <br /> bars use of County attorneys to defend an impeachment. <br /> As a ~eliow public officis_, I can empathize with your <br /> frustration in having to defend yourself from what you believe to <br /> be frivolous and harassing lawsuits, especially where you must <br /> advance the costs of the defense and where reimbursement is <br /> n ertain, For the reasons we discussed t the meeting, however, <br /> whether your actions as council members over the past four <br /> years with respect to the marihuana eradication program meet the <br /> requirements of the County Charter involves solely county issues. <br /> These issues include: what does Section 3-16 of the County <br /> Charter require the Council to do; what, rn fact, has the Council <br /> done over the last four years; do these specific actions meet the <br /> requirements, intent and purpose of Section 3-16. Our Department <br /> is an agency of the State of Hawaii, and we do not have any <br /> special expertise or knowledge on these issues that originate <br /> solely from provisions of the County Charter and involve solely <br /> Council actions. <br /> For similar reasons, o give you an opinion that <br /> under the specific circumstances of t e impeachment petition at <br /> issue, you and other members of the Council are entitled to <br /> reimbursement fcr your legal fees, notwithstanding the County <br /> Charter provision barring the corporation cou f om defending <br /> <br /> officials in impeachment proceedings. Again, <br /> facers created by a provision in the County Charter barring use <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.