My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0027.052 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0027.052 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:38:44 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0027
Point
052
Author
Stewart H. Hussey, President, KEDAA (Keaau Economic Development Advisory Association)
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Communications - File Code
ZNG/PN
Document Relationships
BIL 195 Draft 01 1998-2000
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1998-2000
BIL 195 Draft 04 1998-2000
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1998-2000
COM 0027.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
service Is expelled to be F and the average delay for all motorists using this <br /> Intersection Is expected to be well over one minute. This, In turn, creates a s~tuatlon <br /> which Is Inconsistent with the primary objective of the Keaau Bypass which is the <br /> expeditlous processing of Hdo-Puna commuter traffic. <br /> Analysis based on modified growth and dsrebpment data <br /> A.M. eak Hour P. .Peak Hour <br /> LOS V/c LOS V/c <br /> 008 without Pro ect E 1. 8 0.90 <br /> 2008 with Pro ea E 1.03 f i. LO <br /> NOTES: Signal cycles are 180 sacondsl <br /> "VVlth ProjacZ' Includes addltlonal Hllo-bound through lane. <br /> Delay and LOS of selected critlcal movements <br /> A.M. Peak Hour P.M Peak Hour <br /> NB-TH LT NB-TH SB• SB-LT <br /> 2008 without Pro ect 57.3E 8 .4 f 2 .6 C 3.7 A 18.6 C <br /> 2008 with Pro er. 49.7 ! `7.8, f 78.4 f 83.3, f 62.7, f <br /> RECOMMlNDATiONS <br /> <br /> The analysis shows that K for tfie next few years the Puna District sustains a growth rate <br /> which Is similar to that experienced In the recent past, the subject Intersectoon Is likely <br /> to become a traffic bott~eneck before 2010 even In the absence of major development <br /> by lN. H. Shipman Planned developments such as K,amehameha Schools, a new prison <br /> etc support the hypothesis that a hlgn ra[e of growth in Puna iti likely for the future <br /> As a result, much attention and careful planning is needed pnor to the approval <br /> of major developments. In Cie specific case br W. H. Shipman, the TZAR does not <br /> adequately address the ImpIIWUons of this development (and its ~nter+ded expansion.) <br /> Give^ the antlclpated levels of traffic, the analysis must expand to ~ovpr neighboring <br /> Intersections In each direction. <br /> The amount of future traffic and the results for the ooeratlnnal conditlon at the <br /> subi~~• ~^!ersection strongly suggest that: <br /> • access at the proposed location should be removed; <br /> • two separate signalized aocasses at the Hllo side and Keaau sIAP of thew H <br /> Shipman regional renter will be needed; <br /> • nelr;hboring Intersectlons Head to be examined; and, <br /> n~~ghbnring intersectlons are likely to require signalizat~on. <br /> a <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.