Laserfiche WebLink
~ <br /> <br /> s~ .t ~r.~.,; <br /> t <br /> [page 26, C.E.R] and "improw~aents ere in thapmcau of being conabsected as part of the <br /> Keaau Bypass rnrprova»entr " to the 4way interaectioa !b ctea0e "Rod A" [page 11 <br /> C.E.R] and "DOT her agreed to allow Hans terprovarterrtr provided dbot Shlpaltax pay <br /> jor <br /> the eddtttonal datgR and conatrecetort cam. "[page 11, C.B.R.] <br /> These stateareats seem to be contradictory. ff both statements are true, then the original <br /> concern about as adetiaistatiw approval of Shipmaa's mquat for a mdeaigned 4way <br /> intersection still stands. . <br /> The Traffic Impact Analysis report appended m the C.B.R. seetas to be iaoomplete as it don <br /> not mention any monitoring of ttaiRc other than ao a visual basis. I believe yotQ letter of <br /> November 11, 1997 FiWY-PS 2.72113, requires Shipman to monitor traffic. I would aaatme <br /> this would mesa a count over a austaimd period of dz:. ' y._chaniul means. Perhaps <br /> the traffic flow analysis wn under sepsatle cover. Pkave provide a copy, at your earliest <br /> coaveaience, of the complete T.I.A.R sad tb tratSc mmitaing Douala. <br /> My priraary objective and deepest coacan w that thin matter be handled is an open and lair <br /> mercer. To facilitate that, I have collected the following questions, and would appreciate <br /> your maponse: <br /> ? Why does the Shipman C.E.R. state that an egteetaeat has been reached with DOT for the <br /> redesigned 4way intersection as of September 26, 19997 <br /> ? Has DOT reached agreement wilt W. H. Shipman to change the 3-way intersection of the <br /> Bypass toad with Highway 11 to a 4way intersecfioa7 <br /> ? Have some improvements fns the 4way intersection at "Road A" already been installed as <br /> stated in the Shipman C.E.R7 <br /> ? If so, have taxpayer dollars been expended for these improvetnenn, or has Shipman been <br /> billed for them? <br /> ? Has Shipman submitted a corplete T.IA.R to DOT the Traffic Signal <br /> Phase Plana? <br /> ? Has Shipman complied with Condition No. 10, LUC Docket BR93-699, which requites <br /> monitoring of traffic at on-site and off-site loationaT <br /> ? Han DOT provided Shipman with design parameters including phuing requirements for <br /> the traffic aigraila7 <br /> ? If DOT is allowing a 4way intersection to accommodate a commeroial shopping center, <br /> bow will pedeshian acrxsa be facilitated? Will a Pedestrian Overpass be required? Will <br /> a crosswalk be sufficient? With schools nearby, will this be safe? What would the affect <br /> on Traffic Signal Phaaiag Requirements be7 <br /> <br />