My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0210.001 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0210.001 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:38:32 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:24:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0210
Point
001
Author
Francis L. Benevides, Sr.
Communications - Referred To
PEMC
Comments
PEMC - CLOSE FILE - 05/15/01
Communications - File Code
RDS
Document Relationships
AGE PEMC 05/15/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Parks & Envrionmental Management Committee (PEMC)
COM 0210.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
RES 081 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
RES 081 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d. Concrete-Caisson $reakwaters.~ Breakwaters. of this type are built of <br /> reinforced concrete shells that are floated into position, settled on a <br /> prepared foundation, filled with stone or sand for stability, and then capped <br /> with concrete or stones. These structures may be constructed with or without <br /> parapet walls for protection against uaave overtopping. In general, concrete <br /> zaissons have reinforced concrete bottom, although open-bottom concrete <br /> caissons have been used. The open-bottom type is closed with a temporary <br /> wooden bot-tom that is removed after the caisson is placed on the foundation. <br /> the stone used to fill the compartments combines with the foundation material <br /> to provide additional resistance against horizontal movement. <br /> Caissons are generally suitable for depths from about 3 to 10 meters (ZO <br /> n.o 35 feet). fibs foundation, which usually consists of a mat or mound of rub- <br /> ?51e stone, must support the structure and withstand scour (see Ch. 7,• Sec. <br /> III,8). ~bhere foundation conditions dictate, piles may be used to support the <br /> structure. Heavy riprap is usually placed along the base of the caissons to <br /> protect against scour, horizontal displacement, or weaving when the caisson is <br /> supported on piles. <br /> IX. BREAKWATERS, OFFSHORE <br /> Offshore breakwaters are usually shore-parallel structures located in <br /> mater depths between 1.5 and 8 meters (5 and 25 feet). The main functions of <br /> breakwaters are to provide harbor protection, act as a littoral barrier, pro- <br /> ~ide shore protection, or provide a combination of the above features. Design <br /> considerations and the effects that offshore breakwaters have on the shoreline <br /> and on littoral processes are discussed in Chapter 5, Section IX. <br /> i;. Types. <br /> Offshore breakwaters can usually be classified into one of two types: <br /> the rubble-mound breakwater and the cellular-steel sheet-pile breakwater. The <br /> most widely used type of offshore breakwater is of rubble mound construction; <br /> :..owever, in some parts of the world breakwaters have been constructed with <br /> *imber, concrete caissons, and even sunken ships. <br /> A variation of offshore breakwater is the floating breakwater. These <br /> structures are :designed mainly to protect small-craft harbors in relatively <br /> sheltered waters; they are not recommended. for application on the open coast <br /> recause they have little energy--dissipating effect on the longer period ocean <br /> Wives. `I'tie most recent summary of the literature dealing with floating break- <br /> «-aters is given: by Hales (1981). Some aspects of floating breakwater design <br /> <br /> .are given by Western Canada Hydraulics Laboratories Ltd. (1981). <br /> Selection Qf the type of offshore breakwater for a given location first <br /> depends on functional needs and then on the material and construction costs. <br /> termining factors are the depth of water, the wave action, and the avail- <br /> ~bility of material. For open ocean exposure, rubble-mound structures are <br /> usually required; for less severe exposure, as in the Great Lakes, the <br /> eeLlular-steel sheet-pile structure may be a more economical choice. Figure <br /> ~~E~ illustrates the use of a rubble-mound offshore breakwater to trap <br /> littoral material, to protect a floating dredge, and to protect the harbor <br /> ~w!-rance . <br /> Probably the most notable offshore breakwater complex in the United <br /> 6-93 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.