Laserfiche WebLink
States is the 13.7-kilometer-long (8.5-mile) Los Angeles-Long Beach breakwater <br /> complex built between 1899 and 1949. Other U.S. offshore breakwaters are <br /> listed in Table 5-3 of Chapter 5. <br /> 2. Segmented Offshore Breakwaters. <br /> Depending on the: desired function of an offshore breakwater, it is often <br /> advantageous to design the structure as a series of short, segmented break- <br /> waters rather than as a singular, continuous breakwater. Segmented offshore <br /> breakwaters can be used to protect a longer section of shoreline, while allow- <br /> ing wave energy to be transmitted through the breakwater gaps. This permits <br /> <br /> a constant proportion- of wave energy to enter the protected region to retard <br /> tombolo formation, to aid in continued longshore sediment transport at a <br /> desired rate, and to assist in maintaining the environmental quality of the <br /> sheltered water. Additionally, the segmented breakwaters can be built at a. <br /> reasonable and economical water depth while- providing storm protection for the <br /> shoreline. <br /> Figure 6-66 illustrates the structural details of the segmented rubble- <br /> <br /> mound breakwater at Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio, which is on Lake Erie. This <br /> project, which was completed in October 1977, consists of three detached <br /> rubble-mound breakwaters, each 76 meters long and located in a water depth of . <br /> -2.5 meters (-8 feet) low water datum (LGTD) . T'ne breakwaters are spaced 50 <br /> Haters (160 feet) apart and are placed about 145 meters (475 feet) offshore. <br /> Bey protect 460 meters of shoreline. The longer groin located there was <br /> extended to 106 meters (350 feet), and an initial beach fill of 84,100 cubic <br /> <br /> teeters (110,000 cubl~ yards) was placed. A primary consideration in the <br /> design was to avoid the formation of tombolos that would interrupt the <br /> ~ongshore sediment transport and ultimately starve the adjacent beaches. <br /> Immediately after construction, the project was monitored for 2 years. <br /> ~.ndings indicated that the eastern and central breakwaters had trapped <br /> ~.ittoral material, while the western breakwater had lost material (Walker, <br /> mark, and Pope, 1980;. The net project gain was 3800 cubic meters (5,000 <br /> ~bic yards) of material. Despite exposure to several severe storms from the <br /> .-rst during periods of high lake levels, there had been no damage to the <br /> ~eakwaters or groins and no significant erosion had occurred on the lake j <br /> ~ttom between the breakwaters. f <br /> X. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND DESIGN PRACTICES i <br /> The selection of materials in the structural design of shore protective <br /> marks depends on the economics and the environmental conditions of the shore . <br /> area. The criteria that should be applied to coffiznonly used materials are I <br /> scussed below. ~ <br /> I <br /> Concrete. <br /> i <br /> The proper quality concrete is required for satisfactory performance and ~ <br /> r=rability in a marine environment (see Mather, 1957) and is obtainable with <br /> concrete design :snd construction practices. The concrete should have low <br /> se~eability, provided by the water-cement ratio recommended for the exposure <br /> :_=xlitions; adequate trength; air entrainment, which is a necessity in a <br /> 6-95 <br /> <br />