My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0210.001 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0210.001 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:38:32 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:24:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0210
Point
001
Author
Francis L. Benevides, Sr.
Communications - Referred To
PEMC
Comments
PEMC - CLOSE FILE - 05/15/01
Communications - File Code
RDS
Document Relationships
AGE PEMC 05/15/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Parks & Envrionmental Management Committee (PEMC)
COM 0210.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
RES 081 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
RES 081 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the shoreline adjus ment behind a segmented breakwater that is permeable and <br /> <br /> overtopped. <br /> d. Segmented Breakwaters. A segmented breakwater offers a very func- <br /> tional solution for a long section of shoreline that requires wave transmis- <br /> sion to prevent tombolo formation. The structure can be built nearshore in an <br /> economical water depth because it permits a constant proportion of wave energy <br /> into the protected area. Also, the diffracted waves have the same period as <br /> the incident waves. Segffiented breakwaters can be designed to allow the beach <br /> in their lee to accrete enough sediment to provide an erodible buffer during <br /> storms and still maintain the natural longshore transport rate during normal <br /> wave conditions. <br /> The amount of :energy reaching the lee of the structure is controlled by <br /> the width of the gaps between the breakwaters and the wave diffraction through <br /> these gaps. The gaps should be at least two wavelengths wide, and the length <br /> of each structure segment should be less than the distance offshore. Provid- <br /> ing fewer gaps of greater width will cause the shoreline to respond with <br /> spaced bulges and embayments with an enlarged relief (the seaward distance <br /> from the more shoreward point of the embayment to the tip of the cuspate <br /> spit}, which does not provide uniform storm protection along the project. <br /> If this is not acceptable, increasing the number of gaps and shortening the <br /> length of each segment will promote features of less relief, providing more <br /> uniform protection. Segmented offshore breakwaters are illustrated in Figures <br /> 5-30, 5-32, and 5-33. Figure 5-33 illustrates the use of offshore breakwaters <br /> in conjunction with. a beach fill. <br /> e. Positioning with Respect to Breaker Zone. Placing the breakwater <br /> landward of the nrsrmal breaker zone will advance the shoreline and may cause <br /> tombolo formation (see Fig. 5-32). If positioned well shoreward of the <br /> breaker zone, a large percentage of the total longshore transport will pass <br /> seaward of-the structure and the effect on the adjacent shoreline will be less <br /> severe. This method is not recommended for coasts with steep beach slopes and <br /> narrow surf zones because the area shoreward of the breakwater will tend to <br /> fill completely, turning the breakwater into a seawall. <br /> f. Structure :Orientation. fihe orientation of the breakwater with respect <br /> to both the predominant wave direction and the original shoreline can have a <br /> marked effect on ffhe size and shape of the resulting cuspate spit or tombolo. <br /> A change in structure orientation modifies the diffraction pattern at the <br /> shoreline, and subsequently, the shore response. An approximation of the <br /> shape of the shore response when waves are normally incident to the shoreline <br /> can be deteroained by using the procedures discussed in Chapter 2, Section IV <br /> to determine the diffracted wave crest configuration. For waves that are <br /> extremely oblique to the shoreline, it is recommended that the breakwater be <br /> oriented parallel to the incoming wave crests. This will provide protection <br /> to a longer section of shoreline for a given structure length; however, it <br /> will probably increase the amount of construction material required for the <br /> structure since one end of the breakwater will be in water deeper than if it <br /> were oriented parallel to the bottom contours. <br /> 6. Other Considerations. <br /> Apart from shore response, there are several other factors which affect <br /> 5-71 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.