My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.068 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0212.068 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:47:10 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:45:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0212
Point
068
Author
Kathy Dorn
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented: FC - 4/24/97
Communications - File Code
FND/CIP
Document Relationships
AGE FC 04/24/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Finance Committee (FC)
COM 0212.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~uclea Sunset: Economic Costs of the Canadian Nuclear Industry http://H~uu~.ccnr.org/sunsetl.hanl <br /> amount for decommissionulg1iability. <br /> Federal Heavy Water Investments <br /> Heavy water, needed for CANDU reactors, is difficult, expensive, and dangerous <br /> to manufacture. Considering the grossly inflated historic expectations for <br /> CANDU sales at home and abroad, it is perhaps not surprising that heavy water <br /> manufacture represents the single greatest financial and technological fiasco <br /> experienced by the Canadian nuclear industry. <br /> Two heavv water plants in Nova Scotia, and one in Quebec, as well as most of <br /> the Bruce Heavy Water Plant in Ontario have been built and then shut down in <br /> the absence of any market for the heavy water. In 1981, the Canadian parliament , <br /> forgave AECL heavy water plant loans and interest totalling $816.9 million. <br /> In effect; federal taxpayers provided a one billion dollar subsidy for the <br /> production of a surplus federal heavy water inventory. Nevertheless, AECL and <br /> the federal government have recently agreed to forego a large part of heavy water <br /> sales to South Korea and Romania, giving over $300 million worth of business to <br /> Ontario Hydro instead. At the same time, the federal government has supplied <br /> about $300 million worth of heavy water, free of charge, for a scientific <br /> experiment. This failure to obtain a return on the federal heavy water inventory in <br /> effect adds dollar for dollar to the federal government budget deficit. <br /> Conclusion <br /> Key decision points on public subsidies for the nuclear industry include the <br /> federal budget in 1996, and the expiry of the federal/provincial Memorandum of <br /> Understanding (also known as the CANDU Owners Group agreement) on nuclear <br /> funding on April 1, 1997. The federal parliament's Standing Committee on <br /> Environment and Sustainable Development has already recommended that the <br /> government should "terminate its involvement in the CANDU Owners Group". <br /> Cabinet should heed that advice. <br /> The secret government review of the nuclear industry conducted in 1995 should <br /> be made public. A public consultation process should be launched to consider the <br /> phaseout of public support for the nuclear industry, in advance of the expiry of <br /> the federal; provincial Memorandum of Understanding. <br /> In keeping with current spirit of fiscal restraint, the federal government should <br /> simply end its subsidies to AECL. 1f the nuclear industry is as promising as it <br /> claims, it should be able to provide its own financing and demonstrate that it can <br /> of 76 04/08/97 22:0830 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.