Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> nuclear Sunset: Economic Costs of the Canadian Nuclear lndustn~ http://eww.ccm.org/sunse[l.htm] <br /> ':'oral 4 . 0 38 C. 0 39.5 27?. , 275.5 <br /> 288. 9 <br /> Source: Cameco Corporation Human Resources, March 16, 1995. <br /> Note: These figures are for all on-site staff, and do not include Head Office staff. <br /> 4. The AECL Isotope Business <br /> AECL has experienced a major crisis in its radioisotope business that has <br /> revolved around its plans to build a new isotope production reactor known as the <br /> MAPLE-X10 (Multipurpose Applied Physics Lattice Experimental - 10 MW). <br /> The MAPLE-X10 was intended to take over the main work of isotope production <br /> from the aging NRU reactor, allowing the NRU to play aback-up and research <br /> role for the few remaining years of its life. The NRU (National Research <br /> Universal) is a heavy water moderated and cooled 13~ MWt reactor which first <br /> began operation in 1957. Following atwo-year review and assessment of the <br /> future of the NRU initiated in ] 989, AECL Research eventually decided in 1991 <br /> that a replacement reactor would be built, and that operation of the NRU would <br /> he extended to about the year 2000. [131] Even this short-term lifetime extension <br /> for operation of the NRU required a refurbishment that was expected to take <br /> place in the 199/96 fiscal year at a cost of about $30 million. The refurbishment <br /> plan included upgrading containment. emergency core cooling and emergency <br /> water and power supplies; adding a second shutdown system; and adding a <br /> qualified reactor control room capable of withstanding earthquakes and other <br /> external events. [132] Atomic Energy Control Board staff reviewed the <br /> refurbishment proposal and "were not satisfied that AECL had demonstrated that <br /> these [upgrades] were the most beneficial changes". [133] <br /> However, the NRU had a serious accident on January 12, 1991. A break in a <br /> weld on the cooling system resulted in l 8,000 litres of tritium-contaminated <br /> heavy water leaking into the reactor building. Considerable amounts of tritium <br /> were vented to air over the following two weeks, resulting in tritium levels in <br /> snow at least 100 times above background in an area of a fev~ hundred square <br /> kilometres, mostly on the Quebec side of the Ottawa River. [134] The NRU <br /> remained shut do~~~tt for repairs until mid-December, necessitating the use of the <br /> older, and more polluting NRX (National Research Experimental) reactor for <br /> isotope production. If an}~hing had gone wrong with the NRX reactor, there <br /> would not have been any back-up for radioisotope sales. <br /> In fact, the. NRX reactor was outdated; and had been kept operating despite safety <br /> of 76 04/OR/97 2220.14 <br /> <br />