My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.068 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0212.068 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:47:10 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:45:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0212
Point
068
Author
Kathy Dorn
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented: FC - 4/24/97
Communications - File Code
FND/CIP
Document Relationships
AGE FC 04/24/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Finance Committee (FC)
COM 0212.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Nuclear Sunset: Economic Costs of the Canadian Nuclear Indusm~ http://wM1~w.ccnr.org/sunsetl.html <br /> industry continues to depend on significant subsidies from taxpayers. <br /> Despite its failure to become financially self-supporting, the Canadian nuclear <br /> industry promotes itself by stressing its supposed contributions to the Canadian <br /> economy. The most recent major public relations exercise of this nature was <br /> sponsored by Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL) and conducted by the <br /> consulting firm of Ernst & Young. The resulting report, entitled The Economic <br /> Effects of the Canadian Nuclear Industry, released in October 1993, has been <br /> uncritically accepted by many federal decision-makers. <br /> The present report, called Nuclear Sunset: The Economic Costs of the Canadian <br /> Nuclear Industry is a response to the Ernst & Young report, in the area of <br /> "economic benefits" and AECL subsidies (section 2), and also in the area of <br /> direct employment (section 3). <br /> Nuclear Sunset also identifies three other areas of concern, where AECL <br /> continues to drain the public purse and put the taxpayer in even greater risk of <br /> future liability. These areas are AECL's Isotope Business (section 4); AECL's <br /> Decommissioning Liability (section 5); and Federal Heavy Water Investments <br /> (section 6). <br /> The nuclear industry in Canada is truly a "sunset industry". Activity and <br /> employment both peaked around 1980, and have declined steadily since. Foreign <br /> sales have largely failed to materialize, and nuclear construction proposals in <br /> Canada have been cancelled. <br /> The federal government faces a decision on nuclear subsidies not only for the <br /> 1996 budget, but also in connection with the imminent expiry of a seven-year <br /> Memorandum of Understanding between the federal government, Ontario, <br /> Quebec and New Brunswick on funding for AECL (see section 3.4). The MOU <br /> was initiated in 1990 by Take Epp, former Tory Minister of Energy Mines and <br /> Resources, and it expires on April 1, 1997. The Province of Ontario has recently <br /> cut back its funding of AECL through this program. The federal government and <br /> the provinces (mainly Ontario) must soon decide whether to renew their subsidies <br /> for the Canadian nuclear industry. <br /> An internal, federal government review of the Canadian nuclear industry and <br /> AECL subsidies took place in late 1995. No public participation in this review <br /> was permitted. and the proceedings and results have remained secret. With <br /> nuclear industry supporters firmly entrenched in the government bureaucracy, <br /> there is little doubt that this review will support ongoing (if somewhat reduced) <br /> government subsidies for the Canadian nuclear industry. <br /> of 76 04/08/97 21:57:51 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.