My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0387.013 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0387.013 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 10:47:09 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:36:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0387
Point
013
Author
Don Jacobs
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented: FC - 11/20/01
Communications - File Code
HCC/RPT
Document Relationships
BIL 121 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0387.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> 11-15 01 19:48 DON JACOBS T:80B 965 ®361 P:01 <br /> l~®n Jai®bs ~T~~: t , . <br /> 15-2722 popes Street ;_!4 ~~~-r~~fiS®361 <br /> pah®~, H1 ~5771~ ~ l' ~3`i c~ri ~E~.f~et <br /> November 1 S, 200 <br /> s...~,! y i~ ~ (1~ ~,i(t ~ <br /> ai~dV 1 t t.~/! ~r ~YF~";f <br /> To ail nnembers ®f the Hawaii County Council Finance Commitae. <br /> 1 ~~?'®r~gly ®ppose 6ili 121. <br /> bill 121, if passed, ~rould increase the levy rata for properties with assessed <br /> valuati®r~ below $10,000. What is N®~ a more equitable distribution of C®unty <br /> reven~se ~®liect6ons. <br /> If there is a proven shortfall in revenues, the first thing t® do is cut ba0k the <br /> cost of g®vernenent in every way possible. lf, after Cutting back, there is still <br /> a sh®rtfall, then the levy rate for ail real estate sh®uld be increased aor®ss <br /> the board t® pr®vide the required revenue as is provided ire Chapter 1 g, <br /> Article 11, Section 1990(0) of the Hawaii County Code. And spe~ific~liy as <br /> set forth iri the following Section 19-~®(0} sub-paragraphs: <br /> (3) The am®unt of revenue to be raised from net taxable buildings <br /> within each 0lass shall be divided by the net taxable value of buildings irt~ <br /> that class to deterrraine the tax rate which shat! be expressed In terms <br /> of tax per $1,®®® of rest taxable buildings computed to the ntarest <br /> Cent. <br /> (4) The amount of revenue to be raised from net taxable lands ~rithin <br /> each 01ass shall be divided by the net taxable value of lands in that <br /> Class to deterrr~ine the tax rate which shat! be expressed ire terms of <br /> tax per S 1,000 of net taxable lands cor~p~ted t® the near®st cent. <br /> The Ai~faIT10iV ®f a mir~imurv~ tax in SeOti®n 19-90(g) is effectively double <br /> taxation and shoa~ld be challenged in c®urt. In any event it places an improper <br /> and totally unfair ba~rder~ upcan a segment of the total rea! estate least able <br /> to bear the burden. <br /> Sincerely <br /> Oon Jacobs <br /> Copies t® the media and others. <br /> Osazr 1~~, <br /> air <br /> _ _ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.