My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.129 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0212.129 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:49:25 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:46:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0212
Point
129
Author
Eileen O'Hora Weir, Vice President and East Hawai‘i Coordinator, Hawai‘i Organic Farmers' Association
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented: FC - 4/24/97
Communications - File Code
FND/CIP
Document Relationships
AGE FC 04/24/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Finance Committee (FC)
BIL 062 Draft 01 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
COM 0212.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ A~t~~~~~, ~~;u~ (3 ~"~~~t C~~f~eA_u,,l <br /> NUCLEAR SUNSET: THE ECONOMIC COSTS OF THE CANADIAN NUCLEAR INDUSTRY <br /> by David H. Martin <br /> Nuclear Awareness Project <br /> and David Argue <br /> David Argue Consulting <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> The Canadian nuclear industry was created through government intervention, and from the <br /> beginning relied on public funding. Now, fifty years later, the nuclear industry continues to depend <br /> on significant subsidies from taxpayers. <br /> Despite its failure to become financially self-supporting, the Canadian nuclear industry promotes <br /> itself by stressing its supposed contributions to the Canadian economy. The most recent major <br /> public relations exercise of this nature was sponsored by Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL) and <br /> conducted by the consulting firm of Ernst & Young. The resulting report, entitled The Economic <br /> Effects of the Canadian Nuclear Industry, released in October 1993, has been uncritically accepted <br /> by many federal decision-makers. <br /> The present report, called Nucleaz Sunset: The Economic Costs of the Canadian Nuclear Industry <br /> is a response to the Ernst & Young report, in the area of "economic benefits" and AECL subsidies <br /> (section 2), and also in the area of direct employment (section 3). <br /> Nuclear Sunset also identifies three other areas of concern, where AECL continues to drain the <br /> public purse and put the taxpayer in even greater risk of future liability. These areas are AECL's <br /> Isotope Business (section 4); AECL's Decommissioning Liability (section 5); and Federal Heavy <br /> Water Investments (section 6). <br /> The nuclear industry in Canada is truly a "sunset industry". Activity and employment both peaked <br /> around 1980, and have declined steadily since. Foreign sales have largely failed to materialize, and <br /> nuclear construction proposals in Canada have been cancelled. <br /> The federal government faces a decision on nuclear subsidies not only for the 1996 budget, but also <br /> in connection with the imminent expiry of a seven-year Memorandum of Understanding between <br /> the federal government, Ontario, Quebec and New Brunswick on funding for AECL (see section <br /> 3.4). The MOU was initiated in 1990 by Jake Epp, former Tory Minister of Energy Mines and <br /> <br /> Resources, and it expires on April 1, 1997. The Province of Ontario has recently cut back its funding <br /> <br /> of AECL through this program. The federal government and the provinces (mainly Ontario) must <br /> soon decide whether to renew their subsidies for the Canadian nuclear industry. <br /> 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.