My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0387.023 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0387.023 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 10:48:04 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0387
Point
023
Author
Don Jacobs
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 12/05/01
Communications - File Code
HCC/RPT
Document Relationships
BIL 121 Draft 03 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
means that a $2,500 lot would be taxed at the rate of X40 par $1000 of <br /> assessed value ~ 400% increase in taxes. While lots $10,000 and over <br /> would still only be taxed at ~ 10 per S 1000. <br /> There are almost 10,000 low valued lots in Hawaiian Ocean View estates <br /> alone and another 4,000 plus low valued lots in Nanawale estates. ~e~.1,~3.. <br /> Make an honest assessment of the average cost of county services <br /> consumed by each vacant lot in these subdivisions. You will find it is closer <br /> to zero thin it is to S 100. Vacant land should be excluded. <br /> PART 2 <br /> Yesterday, today and tomorrow there is an ongoing auction of properties <br /> <br /> with delinquent taxes. It's no surprise that over 90°d° of the properties listed <br /> are from two low valued subdivisions Hawaiian Ocean View estates and <br /> Nanawale estates. <br /> Many of these lots have less than $200 in taxes owing but owners are willing <br /> to let them go because there just isn't a market for these substandard lots. <br /> I've talked to a number of people who say that if their tax is raised to ~ 100 <br /> they will let their lot go too. <br /> If dill 121, Graft 3, is passed there will be a great increase in the number of <br /> these substandard lots in the county's inventory. It costs money to <br /> foreclose and the foreclosed lots bring in no tax revenue. <br /> Add interest and ~ 1,294.00 in costs and the upset price is more than most <br /> of these lots are worth. <br /> As a point of interest Are bidders on these properties being informed that <br /> the taxes may be raised to ~ 100? <br /> dill 121, ®raft 3, is unfair and will do more harm than good in the long run. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.