Laserfiche WebLink
FROM: POLS FFx NO.~ 16089747670 05-05-97 03~47P P.06 <br /> radiation." Products that contain irradiated ingredients, such as spices, are not required to be <br /> labeled. A continuing area of research is identifying scientific detection methods to verify that <br /> unlabeled foods have not been irradiated and that labeled foods have received the intended <br /> dose (23). An international general standard for irradiated foods and facilities was adopted <br /> by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, ajoint body of the WHO and the FAO. The <br /> standards are based on the findings of the Joint Expert Committee on Food Irradiation <br /> convened by the FAO, WHO, and International Atomic Energy Agency (10). <br /> Food categories currently approved for irradiation in the United States are listed in Fi ure 3. <br /> The U5 facilities currently in operation process spices, ci[rus fruits, tropical fruits, <br /> strawbemes, tomatoes, mushrooms, potatoes, onions, and poultry. <br /> Consumer/Producer Issues <br /> Despite repeated endorsements and regulatory approval, irradiated foods are not widely <br /> available in the United States. Although consumers are familiar with food irradiation, many <br /> have little knowledge of the process and its advantages (26). When consumers receive <br /> science-based information on food irradiation, however, most prefer irradiated to <br /> nonirradiated spices, poultry, pork, beef, and seafood (20). In a nationwide survey, <br /> consumers indicated that they would pay a premium for irradiated ground beef (26). The <br /> increase in cost for irradiated foods is estimated at 2 to 3 cents per pound for fruits and <br /> vegetables and 3 to 5 cents per pound for meat products (15,16). Produce has been marketed <br /> in some locations without a pace premium due to decreased losses and increased shelf life. h <br /> has bean estimated that the savings from the reduction of foodborne illness are substantially <br /> greater than the modest increase in food cost (13). <br /> Marketing studies support the results of attitudinal surveys (20). Mangoes labeled as <br /> irradiated sold successfully in Florida in 1986. Tn March 1987, irradiated Hawaiian papayas, <br /> available on a 1-da}~ trial in Southern California, outsold the identically priced nonirradiated <br /> counterpart by greater than ten to one. Irradiated apples marketed in Missouri were also <br /> favorably received. Record amounts of irradiated strawberries were sold in Florida in 1992, <br /> and irradiated strawberries, grapefruit, juice oranges, and other products continue to outsell <br /> their nonirradiated counterparts in a specialty produce store in Chicago, IA. Irradiated <br /> poultry, which is available in select markets, has experienced brisk sales- A University of <br /> Georgia shopping simulation test (27) showed a significant increase in the proportion of <br /> consumers purchasing irradiated ground beef after they participated in an educational <br /> program on the benefits of food irradiation. ARer receiving information, 71% purchased <br /> irradiated beef, including 62% of those consumers who originally said they would not <br /> purchase irradiated food. <br /> Role of Dietetit:s and Health Professionals <br /> ADA and qualified dietetics professionals have the responsibility to educate consumers about <br /> food and nutrition issues, including new technologies such as food irradiation. As advocates <br /> for the public on food and nutrition issues, dietitians are in a unique position to monitor the <br /> advancement and further implementation of food irradiation technology. <br /> The greatest need is expanded education for the public and for food retailers. Pilot <br /> educational programs could be offered in which health professionals work with food industry <br /> <br /> ~ or q Si5r97 11.12 P.NI <br /> <br />