Laserfiche WebLink
if one presents the affirmative defense of medicinal use the police treat such affirmative defense as a <br /> get out of jail free card <br /> however if one raises the affirmative defense if religion one is carted off to jail <br /> the police, recognise the religious use of Cannabis as an affirmative defense yet the rules say that one <br /> presenting such a religious defense shall not be left alone but arrested this is persucation based <br /> solely on religion <br /> what is sauce for the goose should be gravy for the gander <br /> these draft rules are not only a violation of 14th amendment rights to equal protection under the law <br /> but they also create a law which persecutes a person with the punishment of arrest based only on <br /> ones claim of religion instead of medicine <br /> In the United States clinical research for the positive benefits of Cannabis are very rare; until recently <br /> they were non existent, yet in Britain the first test of the positive effects of Cannabis describe its <br /> usefulness as a medicine as miraculous <br /> [see attachment <br /> [ see http://www.Cannabisnews.com/news/thread11254.shtml ] <br /> <br /> Jesus commanded his followers to heal the sick in accordance with the will of his Father in heaven <br /> when clinical scientist describe the pain relieving and other positive effects of Cannabis as miraculous <br /> then this is the crossroads between medicine and religion <br /> this solidifies the legitimacy of a Church worshipping and practicing with Cannabis ESPECIALLY in <br /> the realm of religious healing <br /> Such Cannabist faith healing is an inalienable right as defined in Blacks Law Dictionary as a right <br /> which can only be given up and never taken away by any government <br /> the members of the Religion of Jesus Church do not give up our right to use Cannabis for healing <br /> religiously <br /> the only way to possibly abrogate such a fundamental American right is via the amendment process <br /> to the US Constitution and Hawaii State constitution <br /> since an amendment has never been passed to outlaw a citizen from religiously using this God Given <br /> Cannabis a MIRACULOUS cure, law enforcement has no legitimate concern in invading the privacy of <br /> ones home to religiously persecute any citizen <br /> further the draft rules fail in several other regards <br /> the rules say an officer shall not decide when State versus Blake shall apply leaving that to the courts <br /> however the rule do not address the preexistence of stipulated agreements recognizing the only <br /> contestable issues in certain Churches for example Rastafanianism or The Religion of Jesus Church <br /> the draft rules fail to instruct an officer to not arrest someone when the courts have recognized by <br /> such stipulated agreement that State v. Blake has already been complied with such as with the <br /> Religion of Jesus Church and Rastafarian Iyah Ben Makahna of Guam who has his religious rights <br /> protected while visiting me and others in this state recently and in the near future <br /> these rules misidentify gender with maturity <br /> <br />