COM 0027.062 2000-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5. 'I• f ' Est but certainly not least, Shipman has always made promises to the-local community, but has consistently failed local residents. Consider the following: a. r i f .h hi ri .Several years ago, over the loud- and vocal protests of local residents, Shipman bulldozed the historic older buildings i€~ Kea'au village (saying they were structurally unsound}, but promised to rebuild sireilar structures in the same quaint, plantation style, and even provided architectural drawings of such structures. What did- Shipman eventually build? tcConalds and a gas station! b. ~ in i r r ' I have obtained copies of correspondence betw~n Shipman and the state ~®T showing that Shipman obtained, under the table; approval from the state to include much of tl`Se basic infrastructure for theirfour-way stoplight as part of the initial Kea'au Sypass construction! `The approval by the ®®T was based on aShipman-provided traffic analysis (TZAR) that has been judged as seriously inadequate by an outside transportation professional. This would have all continued to be a secret if Andy Levin had not pursued Shipman and the state ~®l° about their private arrangement. ices this scenario demonstrate good faith by Shipman on behalf of the community, or does it reveal a company dishonestly pursuing its own self-interests? c. I i n f i n r i n f v' .After the County Council tabled the Gateway project last year, Shipman hired biro Sumada to oversee their development projects in Kea'au. 9~t a community meeting held in Kea'au, 4~Ir. Sumada announced that Shipman was sponsoring a Kea'au Citizen's Advisory Committee, and that those interested should put their names on the sign- up sheet. I had signed up as the only representative of Flawai'i Island Planning Advocates, but was never invited to the mee#ing. When I called Moir. Sumada to fnd out why, he indicated that there were already enough people coming, and that I would not be allowed to attend. I-lowever, I was told by someone attending the first meeting that there were probably 8-10 representatives in attendance from just one local ICea'au church group! It became clear to me that Shipman is truly not interested in hearing from the local community-- particulariy from anyone that might challenge them and their development plans for I~u;~a. We are at a critical juncture in our island's growth and development, and many of us are :still hopeful that, ands: 1l4tayor Kim's administration, the beauty and uniqueness of this island can be preserved. I-lowever, poorly conceived proposals such as the Gateway project cannot be allowed to go forward until they are approved by local residents and are part of community-based plans that clearly spell out how fat}.are development gill proceed. Until then, €~una residents Sill be happy to drive a few more miles into Flilo, rather than end up with a bypass nightmare that will do nothing to raise our quality of life. _