My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.291 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0212.291 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2017 11:56:53 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:46:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0212
Point
291
Author
Eileen O'Hora-Weir, Dakini Enterprises
Communications - Referred To
Council
Comments
Presented: Council - 5/7/97
Communications - File Code
FND/CIP
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 05/07/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Council
COM 0212.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
XAMPLES OF APPROPRI,. fE PUBLIC SPENDINC'1'O PROMOTE blVERSIFIED AGRlCL'LTURE L Ik~'(•l~~ <br /> Below are some of my thoughts concerning appropriate public expenditures on technology, <br /> itlfrastruetuto, product developlileni, and market promotion which both county and state governments <br /> should invest in to promote the growth of diversiRed sustaittable%rganic agricultural practices (SOAP). <br /> These suggestions are very rough at. this time and I won't have time to expand on this until after the <br /> university finishes in mid-May. <br /> ¦ Money for the ¢ommercialiration of other appropriate noa-nuclear post-harvest treatment <br /> technologies including, but not limited to, both cold and dry heat treatments for pest <br /> control and hot water treatment for media aterillzation. These technologies have been <br /> tested a[ the research level, but are not commercially operational yet. Why not`? The dollar <br /> estimate vn eradication efforts has been concocted through the efforts of the EPIC (F,xotic Pcst <br /> Insect Committee) which has been a very dysfunctional organization. I would like to see a <br /> se;+arate estimate on establishment of fruit fly-free zones. Actually, the Drily fruit Fly we have <br /> in Hawaii which represents a threat to the southern mainland states is the Oriental Fruit Fly. <br /> I suspect there is no hard science which will back the quarantines un the other three fruit flies <br /> (Mediterranean, melon and Malaysian) in terms of their ability to establish on the mainland. <br /> The USDA APHIS regulations are not necessarily based on science which is clear when ortc <br /> compares internatyonal requirements with intersiale restrictioav. The Sharwil avocado case also <br /> clearly points to the fact that I3awaiian agriculture has been kept purposefully disadvantaged <br /> through the policital power of the California and Florida Fruit Growers Associations. There is <br /> a move to establish an internationally acceptable regulation since under GATT and NAETA <br /> differential applications of these regulations will be viewed as unfair trade practices. <br /> Therefore, it is my opinion that Ilawaii will be the proving gmund for irradiation on tropical <br /> foods which, if'passed by the USbA as an appropriate post-harvest technology for compliance <br /> with APHIS regulations, will lay the foundation for transferring I'vod irradiation technologies <br /> to all tropical food producing countries. This plan supports the fads desire to create a n:uket <br /> fur cobalt ti0 technology and also complies with Sethi Naya's (head of 1)liLDT) call For <br /> stimulating }Iawaii's economy through transfer of technologies to Asia. <br /> <br /> ¦ A4oney for the establishment of a research/commercial beneficial insectary. <br /> Currently, it is illegal tv import SDX beneficial insect into the state of Hawaii, One cannot do <br /> so even through a permitting process unless one is associated with a research arm of the <br /> university. )?ven then, it is extremely difficult. Most commercially available beneficials arc <br /> raised in a laboratory situation and aro considered 99.9% clean of possible parasites (with the <br /> exception of lady bugs which commercial insectaries gather from the wild due to their <br /> availability as a result of mating behavior and the complexity of their diet which would be hard <br /> to simulate in a laboratory situation). Also, only general parasites (Encarsia spp a parasitic <br /> wasp which gives fantastic control of greenhouse and silver back white (ties) and predators <br /> (lady bugs, green lacewings, praying mantis) which have limited benefit to tropical agriculture <br /> are being raised by mainland and European insectaries since these establishments cater to <br /> temperate climate agriculture. We need to support research of beneficials needed for tropical <br /> agriculture since many of the insects that cause economic damage in the tropics arc tither nut <br /> present or do nut cause serious economic damage in temperate climates. '1'imcly release of <br /> beneficials either as "incubation" meaning introduction of beneficials before the negative pest <br /> population is significant or "augmentation" which refers to the release of large numbers of <br /> M Eileon O'Hota-Weir, Dakini EAtmprises 5/INS 1 Comm. Np: Z/: <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.