|
'A.
<br /> be? So far specific levels of tasks into a series of more manageable ,
<br /> ' decontamination, consistent milestones leading to a specific out-
<br /> ; with an intended ultimate come. The contractor's compensation
<br /> use, have not been set at most depends partly or wholly on when and
<br /> sites. In fatt, the U.S. govern- how well it meets the milestones. Simi-
<br /> L
<br /> ment sell has no standazd
<br /> s lar v
<br /> ersions are also bein
<br /> tm lemente
<br /> d
<br /> g P i
<br /> IpT
<br />
<br /> I"
<br /> that can be used to determine at other DOE tom lexes besi
<br /> des Han-
<br /> _ P
<br /> when a radiological cleanup ford and also in the contract the DOE
<br /> _ i~ is complete. The goal of re- has wi[h Bechtel Hanford, another
<br /> t turning all of Hanford to large contrattor at the site.
<br /> ~ pristine condition-an utter Thomas P. Grumbly, who was assis-
<br /> impossibility made plain by Cant secretary in charge of the Environ-
<br /> themost rudimentary analy- mental Management program unril his
<br /> sis-has only recently fallen recent promotion to undersecretary of
<br /> i by the wayside. As spokes- energy, has high hopes for the rech-
<br /> ~ man Michael V. Berriochoa niques. The idea, he adds, is [o "work
<br /> of Westinghouse Hanford on the economics first and realize that -
<br /> puts it, "There isn't enough the economics, over time, will really
<br /> money in the world." change the system. How much time: [
<br /> ~ don't know. Four or five years."
<br /> ~ Irtr roved Contractin ~ Althou
<br /> p g. gh most observers say perfor-
<br /> mance-based contracting is too new co
<br /> W A (though the peculiaz na- judge, a former DoE official intimately
<br /> ~ tore of Hanford often familiar with [he Environmental Man-
<br /> s defies conventional metrics agemenc program is pessimistic. To de- -
<br /> of cleanup, there is also am- contaminate a building, the former
<br /> „ ple evidence that utuch of official explains, a contract would have
<br /> the wod: done so far has to specify that "the building contairs
<br /> DRUMS OF CONTAMINATED SOLVENT were been grossly inefficient. By the following contaminants in the fol-
<br /> simply buried in the soil 35 yeazs ago; most of them [he DOE's own esnmates, lowing concentrations. If you don't -re
<br /> decayed and leaked their contents. Unlike many of cleanup projects started be- know what they are, you would have
<br /> Hanford's 1,400 waste sires, though, [he contatnina- tween 1989 and 1994 were to issue a separate contract just to do
<br /> tion in the case shown here was relatively confined. 30 to 50 percent more expen- the assessment, so you can write a 4~.-~
<br /> sive than their equivalents in specific enough contratt to do the job
<br /> with the state legally requires the DOE the private Bettor. right. I have no confidence that the DoE
<br /> ro bury in the 200 Area eight of the Because virually all work at the can get all the detailed knowledge to
<br /> nine reactor blocks (the cores of the pro- weapons sites is done by private con- make it work. They would have to rely
<br /> duction reactors where the uranium cracting companies hired by the DOE, on the convattors themselves to do
<br /> rods were inserted) and their concrete the ways contracts are written and those assessmenu, in all probability."
<br /> pedestals, sometime around 2070. struttured can strongly influence the John D. Wagoney the manager of the
<br /> Each reactor block and its pedestal cost of work. Unfortunately, the DOE's DOE's Richland Operations Office, says
<br /> comprise an enormous, highly radioac- traditional contracting method, known that the DOE has called in the consult-
<br /> tive pair of slabs weighing 15,000 tons. as a cost-plus or cost-reimbursal sys- ing firm Arthur Andersen to help write
<br /> The leading plan for hauling them to [em, penalizes efficiency and [hrift. Un- the next round of performance-based
<br /> the 200 Area involves the use of a 540- der this scheme, the DOE reimburses a contratts. (Ironically, the contract with
<br /> million crawling transporter; according contractor for all its expenses in mak- Andersen is no[performance-based.)
<br /> to the Blush and Heitman repot[, one ing a produtt or performing a service. Whatever its coven[ difficulties, per-
<br /> DOE official called the idea "lunanc." Additionally, the DOE gives the con- formance-based convacring cannot be
<br /> The additional costs of moving the re- tractor a percen[age as profi[; the more worse Chan the cost-plus system, many
<br /> actors-rather [hen entombing them in spent, the greater the profit. The system observers insist. "convacring has been
<br /> place, as many technical analysts fa- is a holdover from the early weapons at the heart of the problems they've
<br /> vor-have been put ac $500 million. days, when the risks and costs were had," notes James Noel, assistant direc-
<br /> When the hundreds of thousands of largely unknown and constantly Chang- for for energy issues of [he GAO.
<br /> tons of waste have been consolidated, ing. Cleanup persormel may also fear
<br /> stabilized, packaged and redisposed in that the harder they work, the sooner Legal Hammer
<br /> the 200 Area, basically all the plateau's they will be unemployed. At Hanford,
<br /> 130 square kilometers will become a de DOE spokesman Terry L. Brown notes, ~ ontratting, though, is not all that
<br /> facto repository, in all likelihood for "you hear a dot of [elk: `I'm working ails Hanford by any means. In
<br /> thousands of years to come. (The shoe- myself out of .job.'" 1989, around the time of the Rocky
<br /> lived DoE euphemism for such regions In 1994, to try to deal with these Flats crackdown, the DOE, the EPA and
<br /> was "national sacrifice areas.") problems, the DOE and Westinghouse the state of Washington signed an ex-
<br /> And once this consolidation has been Hanford switched roperformance-based haustive Tri-Parry Agreement (TPA),
<br /> accomplished, how clean will Hanford contratts. The approach separate huge which governs almost all aspects of en-
<br /> 94 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN May 1996 Nan ford's Nuc(msWasttland
<br />
<br />
|