Laserfiche WebLink
• G <br /> E Story "~I10735° Re' ~sted by INFO STATION (\S* $L5RV) on 5/20/97 13:45: <br /> St. Petersburg Times <br /> <br /> Publication Date: 10/i9/91 % <br /> Pt ge: SA <br /> xD: Legitimate concerns about 'eradiation <br /> SE: EAZTORIALS <br /> EX: There are three proper public concerns about Food irradiation: <br /> the safe handling of the radioactive materials used in the process, <br /> the lass of nutritional value in processed foods and the full and <br /> meaningful notification tc the public on all foods that have been <br /> irradiated. <br /> More than 1,000 people in Florida were concerned enough to write <br /> to the governor opposing the Vindicator Inc. irradiation plant, <br /> scheduled to begin operations by the end of the year in Palk <br /> County. <br /> Irradiation is a sterilization technique in which food is exposed to <br /> gamma rays to kill bacteria and other pests. It is commonly used to <br /> sterilise medical supplies and some spices, though it isn~~t yet widely <br /> used for lood. That could change if Vindicator Inc. opens the <br /> ' n"s firs a~f{{~~od irradiation plant in Mulberry. <br /> The state~~as"`~esponded to the public"s concern. The department <br /> f Health an Rehabilitative Services F agreed to hold a public <br /> hearing in Mulberry Nov. a to gather nform ti n u the safety <br /> nd operation of the plant ~.H~; ~~Edtz~y~-nl~iz~' <br /> ~d <br /> _'~Phe hearing is a good move. It will provide the public its first <br /> opportunity to raise safety questions before the plant begins <br /> o ations. <br /> To make well-informed comments, people should obtain as much <br /> information as possible befogs the hearing about the transpoxtation <br /> n handling of large amounts of radioactive materials. ~ <br /> At a plant in Georgia, the radioactive sources have leaked, <br /> exposing workers and their families to radiation. What will prevent <br /> such an accident here? What kind of training will the workers and <br /> the transporters receive? Who pays for the cleanup in the case of an <br /> accident? The Georgia plant cost $3o-million to clean up. <br /> eeple also need to push for close monitoring of the plant. ThE <br /> vNuclear Regulatory commission says most accidents at irradiation <br /> plants have been caused by operators who circumvented safety <br /> features. HRS should keep a close eye on the plant to make sure <br /> p rotors don"t get sloppy. <br /> HRS spokesman David Adams said the agency will have - <br /> inspectors on hand 3aily while the operation is being set up, and will <br /> do six-month checks initially. But HRS is required to inspect only <br /> once a year, far too seldom for adequate oversight of such a <br /> potentially dangerous operation. That"s one thing HRS can control <br /> and citiaens can demand. <br /> Sam Whitney, president of Vindicator, has brushed off questions <br /> by neighbors, rejecting them as the dupes of out-oE-town opponents. <br /> This is the public"s chance to remind him of his responsibilities <br /> w he runs an operation that could endanger their health. <br /> one thing the hearing won"t settle is the question of nutritional <br /> loss of irradiated °ood. HRS has a narrow purvic-w, limited only to <br /> the handling of the cobalt 60 and the plant"s operations. <br /> it"s clear that irradiation, like other methods of processing, can <br /> <br />