COM 0674.015 2000-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Hawaii County Council September 5, 2002 Page 3 6. There is nowhere to develop or connect further from the subject property. The property located directly next to the subject property (east or mauka), according to the present owners (the same owners as the subject property) will not be subdivided because of the flood channel that runs through the property. According to their representations to us, this adjoining lot will be preserved as a 5.386 acre lot. Planning for a County desicable road with wide areas of pavement and drywells with no real and practical functionality should be discouraged in favor of preserving the landscaping. 7. The flood channel represents a natural boundary to curb future traffic flow into the Nani Kailua and Queen Kaahumanu Highway intersection. Properties and developments located north of the flood channel should be serviced by arterial and collector roads leading to Palani Road, including the proposed Hienaloli- Kahului Road extension. This would be more consistent and desirable in quelling neighboring residents' complaints about traffic flow from new developments in the area. We plan to come before the Planning Department, Planning Commission and the Hawaii County Council with a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment and Change of .one application to also create asingle-family residential subdivision and eventually construct our residences into this recently acquired property. We, therefore, respectfully ask your favorable consideration in deleting Condition No. G in its entirety; or with no reference or inference to our Lot No. 3 by deleting the Kakalina Street language from the Draft Sill and stipulating that the Hienaloli-Kahului Road shall be the mid-level arterial or collector road between Nani Kailua Drive and Palani Road. This would make the condition consistent with the Keahole to Keauhou Road System Plan. Sincerely, William L. Wong WLW/efh