Laserfiche WebLink
PC-lOl -3- August 13, 2002 <br /> <br /> Bill No. 232, Draft 3, which included the following amendments addressing the concerns of Your <br /> Committee, was also circulated and approved. <br /> 1. Condition G. <br /> a. Deletes "The applicant shall consult with the Planning Department and the <br /> Department of Public Works regarding additional roadway connections to <br /> adjoining parcels, prior to the submittal of plans for subdivision review." <br /> b. Inserts "The interior roadway system shall be stubbed out to the adjoining <br /> parcel to the east to be consistent with the County's regional roadway <br /> circulation plans. This roadway will be constructed to dedicable standards <br /> and dedicated to the County. This road shall be barricaded at the eastern <br /> boundary of the subject property until such time that this roadway is <br /> connected through the adjoining parcel to Kakalina Street and Kakalina <br /> Street is continued to the north." <br /> 2. New Condition M. Inserts "Wastewater shall be disposed of in a manner meeting <br /> with the requirements of the Department of Health." <br /> Committee Member Julie Jacobson stated she would oppose this measure because of the flood <br /> issue. Committee Member Nancy Pisicchio stated that she would consult the Planning <br /> Department regarding the flood situation. <br /> Your Committee did not entertain further discussion on this measure. <br /> Your Committee concurs with the Planning Commission and the Planning Director for <br /> recommending a favorable consideration for the change of zone request. <br /> Your Committee also concurs with the Planning Director and the Planning Commission in <br /> finding that the conditions are (1) necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to <br /> the public health, safety and welfare; or (2) reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly <br /> emanating from the land use proposed with respect to (A) protection of the public from the <br /> potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use, or (B) fulfillment of the need for public <br /> service demands created by the proposed use. In this case, a condition to prohibit the <br /> construction of a second dwelling is imposed because of concerns over the overall density of the <br /> proposed subdivision and to mitigate potential impacts upon public facilities and infrastructure <br /> servicing the affected area. <br /> For informational purposes only, because Committee Member Nancy Pisicchio needs to resolve <br /> the flooding issue, she voted "kanalua" twice. <br /> PC-101 <br /> <br />