REP PC 105 10/22/2002 2000-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PC -1 OS 2 October 22, 2002 The County currently owns TMK: 7-6-21:18 and 19 which encompasses the natural existing flood plains. The proposed flood control system will take a straighter route and require consolidation and resubdivison of Gamrex and County owned lands. (Any subdivision and land transfer of County owned lands requires County Council approval.) Roadway easements over the concrete lined channels will be required by Gamrex for access to TMK:7-6-21:17 (zoned RM-5) which is presently landlocked by County owned drainage easements. Appropriate bridge locations and roadway alignments servicing Parcel 17 will require DPW review and approval, and County Council approval of the resulting grants of easements. Since May 15, 1984, the effective date of Ordinance No. 84-23 which rezoned approximately 103 acres of land from Unplanned to RS-15 and 70 acres from Unplanned to RM-5, five time extensions have been granted for Ordinance Nos. 88-4, 90-62, 91-96, 93-26, and 97-99. Additionally, two administrative time extensions were granted in 1989 and 1995. Committee Member Curtis Tyler reiterated the concerns of the Planning Commission. Your Committee did not entertain further discussion on this measure. Your Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Director and the Planning Commission in that "the applicant is actively pursuing the required permits for the flood control system and is concurrently working on developing Unit 2 of the Single Family Residential (RS) zoned lands. Infrastructural improvements funded by the applicant will result in drainage, roadway, and water system improvements within and beyond the boundaries of the project site. The applicant's ability to secure final plan approval of the Multiple Family Residential (RM) zoned lands is subject to the approval of the flood control system. Over the many years the applicant has been before the Commission, the applicant has shown perseverance in managing the many requirements, which they have had to deal with. The applicant has either complied with, or initiated the process of compliance with all other conditions of approval within the subject ordinance." Your Committee concurs with the Planning Commission and the Planning Director for recommending a favorable consideration for the change of zone request in granting the time extension. Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the intent and purpose of Bill No, 268, and recommends it pass first reading. AYES NOES A & E EX LEITHEAD-TODD X Respectfully submitted, TYLER X COMMITTEE ON PLANNING ARAKAKI X ~ ; CHUNG X ; ~~s ~ ~ ~ ..U F.LARIONOFF X JACOBSON X SOBgY JEAN l EITHEAD-TODD. CHAIR PISICCHIO X PC REPORT NO. Q lOS SAFARIK X ADOPTED: NOV O C7 ZOO YAGONG X - _ - -