My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 265 Draft 02 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
2000-2002
>
BIL 265 Draft 02 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2008 8:58:15 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 3:02:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2000-2002
Bill/Resolution
265
Draft
02
Introducer
Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd, Councilmember Chair, Planning Committee
Referred To
PC
Action 1
Presented: PC - 01/22/03
Action 2
PC: Amends Bill 265, Draft 2, to Draft 3 - 2/19/03
File Code
HCC/ZNG
Document Relationships
AGE PC 02/19/2003 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2002-2004\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 265 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0099.000 2002-2004
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
COM 0099.006 2002-2004
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
COM 0099.006 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
COM 0110.001 2002-2004
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
COM 0759.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(10) Identification of regulatory and non-regulatory tools recommended <br /> to implement the Corridor Management Plan. The evaluation and selection of tools <br /> needed to protect and/or enhance the corridor should be based on the following criteria: <br /> (A) Provide the ability to insure that new development is <br /> consistent with the conditions and standards established for the scenic corridor, while <br /> maintaining the property owner's [right for economic return on investment.] rights to <br /> reasonable us~.of the ntopertv. <br /> (h) Provide the appropriate degree of development and <br /> aesthetic control needed to preserve and enhance quality of the corridor. <br /> (C) Provide the flexibility to apply a diversity of suitable <br /> regulatory and non-regulatory tools and techniques to a variety of circumstances. <br /> (11) Specific time schedules. <br /> (12) Standards for building design, signage, and roadway elements. [n <br /> the case where the transportation corridor has not been built, the Corridor Management <br /> Plan may include special design standards for the corridor development. <br /> (13) Methods for interpreting significant resources. <br /> (f) The director shall forward the Corridor Management Plan to the <br /> commission together with the director's recommendation on the proposed Scenic <br /> Corridor Overlay District, and together with a proposed scenic corridor overlay district <br /> <br /> enabling ordinance which establishes the scenic corridor district and provides standards <br /> <br /> and conditions for within the district, including permitted land uses, accessory uses, <br /> <br /> densities, heights, setbacks, signage, view planes, access management, and variances <br /> <br /> from the requirements of this chapter, if applicable, as contained in the Corridor <br /> <br /> Management Plan. <br /> (g) The commission shall review the enabling ordinance and the Scenic <br /> Corridor Management Plan and forward its recommendation to the council through the <br /> <br /> mayor for the council's consideration and action. <br /> (1) In reviewing the Corridor Management Plan, the commission shall <br /> <br /> hold at least one public hearing in the council district in which the proposed scenic <br /> corridor overlay district is located. <br /> 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.