My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.451 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0212.451 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2017 11:56:56 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:48:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0212
Point
451
Author
Tim Man, Co-Chair; Julie Jacobson, Co-Chair; Ellen Takazawa, Treasurer; Jay Sharf, Membership Chair; Robert Ritter, Recorder
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented: FC - 4/24/97
Communications - File Code
FND/CIP
Document Relationships
AGE FC 04/24/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Finance Committee (FC)
COM 0212.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"1 <br /> ~'he.,. <br /> I~~W~T ~J~C~~o+}-~nt <br /> ~3J C~ N t.,td L F RECEIVED "s'" _ _ <br /> Ecology 'onvrolence~rt1e-.-'^-_~'~''y~~q~-•--•_-.-.-----~ <br /> Grassroots .Democracy Social Jastice Dq~'-"`-aunty coun~il~ Ja~ f'"C- <br /> PO Box 3220, KaiEua-Kona H! 96745 <br /> Big Island 32-GREEN, or $(j0-2$3-3377 <br /> April 24, 1997 <br /> <br /> The Finance Committee of the County Council has been asked by Mayor Yamashiro to provide <br /> $2 million dollars of taxpayers' money to pay fora "post harvest treatment facility project". It is <br /> known that this money is to enable the establishment of an irradiation facility on the Big Island. <br /> It is not known whether these funds will be used to actually build such a facility, to promote <br /> marketing of irradiated fruit, to promote utilization of this facility by Hawaii farmers to ensure <br /> adequate through put, or to subsidize the irradiation company which even the proponents of <br /> irradiation admit will probably operate at a loss for the first few years. As of April 4r", County <br /> Council members who had met, over the last few weeks with concerned residents about <br /> irradiation, acknowledged that they did not know how the Mayor wanted to use this money. <br /> The Hawaii County Green Party opposes this entire project because of its potential catastrophic <br /> costs and impacts on residents of the Big Island. The Green Party examines issues in terms laf <br /> its four pillars: ecological wisdom, grassroots democracy, social justice and nonviolence. These <br /> concepts are germane to the issue of irradiation. <br /> The ecological issues with irradiation are vast and disturbing. Many serious accidents have <br /> happened in irradiation facilities which have resulted in injury; contamination of land and water, <br /> loss of life; and huge clean up costs born by taxpayers. The Hawaii Development Irradiator in <br /> Honolulu, operated in the late 1960s and closed when most of its Cesium 137 strips leaked and <br /> caused radioactive contamination of the whole facility and areas surrounding the plant. <br /> Contamination lasted 12 years before it was cleaned up. Cesium 137 contamination clean up at <br /> the Radiation Sterilizers plant in Decatur, Georgia cost $47 million. Even operating properly, <br /> these plants are allowed to emit 3 to 5 times more radiation than the natural background levels. <br /> Issues related to transporting and storing radioactive materials are especially troubling. Cobalt <br /> 60, the fuel suggested for a Big Island irradiator, must be stared ar used for 120 years before <br /> recharging within a nuclear reactor. The reactor that is used to recharge the Cobalt 80 is in <br /> Canada. This reactor is overdue for decommissioning and will be closed in the year 2000. <br /> There is no guarantee that this nuclear waste will have a "home". One could say that the <br /> nuclear industry, including food irradiation, is like a Ponzi scheme where profits are being <br /> collected without any regard for the ultimate costs to be borne by the public at large. An <br /> unending series of accidents, cover ups, failures to protect human health, and mushrooming <br /> costs for the public typify this industry. <br /> The proponents of food irradiation would have you believe that the conclusions about food safey <br /> and nutrition are adequately resolved. Marcia Van Gernert, Ph.D., toxicologist, was chair of the <br /> FDA committee which examined 441 irradiation studies and then selected 5 studies as the basis <br /> to conclude that irradiation is safe. Marcia Van Gernert, in correspondence to Assemblyman <br /> John Kelly of New Jersey on 10/19193, states, "These studies reviewed in the 1982 memo from <br /> the FDA were not adequate by 1982 standards, and are even less adequate by 1993 standards <br /> to evaluate the safety of any product, especially a food product such as irradiated foods." Many <br /> ~ llq 2 <br /> 1B~ lfa <br /> gam, qy~ Presented E'C <br /> Ref. Date ~'R 2 4 ~9at <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.