My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0230.002 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0230.002 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2015 3:40:11 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:48:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0230
Point
002
Author
Leslie Chow, Fiscal/Program Review Auditor
Communications - Referred To
PWPC
Communications - File Code
HCC/VEH
Document Relationships
AGE PWPC 08/18/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Public Works & Parks Committee (PWPC)
BIL 068 Draft 02 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
COM 0230.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page Two <br /> In addition to including these changes, the attached Draft 2 of the bill also incorporates language <br /> changes that seek to promote: 1) conformity with sections 46-16 and chapter 291C, HRS; and <br /> 2) clarity in the law. <br /> In June copies of the draft bill and brief were sent to Police Chief Wayne Carvalho, Prosecuting <br /> Attorney Jay Kimura, Chief Engineer Donna Fay Kiyosaki, Corporation Counsel Richard <br /> Wurdeman, and Planning Director Virginia Goldstein. The Police Chief, Prosecuting Attorney, <br /> and Chief Engineer responded in writing, indicating that they had no objections to the draft bill. <br /> (Copies of their comments are attached) Although the Corporation Counsel and Planning <br /> Director did not submit written comments, Deputy Corporation Counsel Gerald Takase assisted <br /> in the development of the draft and Planning Deparnnent staff offered comments and suggestions <br /> to promote the clarity of the bill. <br /> As a result of the comments received during the review period, a purpose section was added to <br /> the bill to clarify the scope of this legislation. <br /> PURPOSE <br /> The purpose of this amendment is to authorize and require owners of private streets to place and <br /> maintain official traffic control devices, signs, signals, and markings on their private streets upon <br /> adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Council. <br /> HISTORY <br /> In 1973 and again in 1988 and 1995, the State Legislature enacted changes to the law to enable <br /> <br /> the counties to impose and enforce traffic regulations on private streets. <br /> Categories of Streets Affected: <br /> The Legislature's changes to the law, contained in section 46-16, HRS, amended the law <br /> to allow the counties to impose and enforce traffic regulations and place appropriate <br /> traffic control devices on: <br /> 1) Any private street, highway, or thoroughfare used continuously by the public for <br /> at least six months; <br /> 2) Any private street, highway, or thoroughfare which is open for public travel and <br /> intended for dedication to public use (per section 264-1, HRS), but has not yet <br /> been accepted to the County. <br /> Private roads used primarily for agriculture and ranching purposes were specifically <br /> exempted from inclusion in these categories. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.