My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0140.005 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0140.005 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 2:55:28 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:08:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0140
Point
005
Author
West Hawai‘i Crime Stoppers, Inc. (Submitted by Alan J. Pratt)
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 3/19/03
Communications - File Code
BUD
Document Relationships
BIL 059 Draft 01 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0140.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Michigan State Police Tests 2003 <br />Patrol Vehicles <br />satrol vehicles are among the most <br />critical purchases that a law enforce- <br />ment agency makes. For both large <br />and small gencies, patrol vehicle purchases <br />L_frequentlq' epresent the second largest ex- <br />penditure, after personnel, in their annual <br />operating budgets. Selecting a vehicle that <br />balances both budgetary and performance <br />requirements has become an increasingly <br />challenging task for police fleet administra- <br />tors. Many agencies are painfully aware of <br />the consequences that result from being <br />"penny wise and pound foolish," where <br />vehicles with inadequate performance, such <br />as regular production passenger vehicles not <br />specifically designed for police service, are <br />selected because they cost less than police - <br />package vehicles. Although some agencies <br />have had limited success with nontraditional <br />police vehicles, most agencies find that the <br />increased maintenance costs resulting from <br />such vehicles breaking down under the <br />stress of police service quickly offset any <br />initial savings. <br />For more than 25 years, the Michigan State <br />Police (MSP) has conducted extensive evalua- <br />tions of the performance capabilities of each <br />new model year's police vehicles as part of its <br />annual vehicle procurement process. Since <br />1981, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), <br />through its National Law Enforcement and <br />Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC) <br />system, has sponsored these tests through a <br />partnership with MSP. By disseminating these <br />(17) <br />results to State and local law enforcement <br />agencies, NIJ helps these agencies select vehi- <br />cles that maximize their budgets and ensures <br />that evaluated vehicles provide reliable and <br />safe performance under the increased <br />demands of police service. <br />The 2003 model year patrol vehicles were <br />evaluated from September 21 through 23, <br />2002. For the purposes of the MSP evalua- <br />tion, police -package vehicles are those that <br />are designed and manufactured for use in <br />the full spectrum of law enforcement patrol <br />service, including pursuits. A special -service <br />vehicle is a vehicle that may be used by law <br />enforcement agencies for specialized use <br />(e.g., off-road, inclement weather, K-9, or <br />commercial vehicle enforcement), but is not <br />designed or manufactured to be used in high <br />speed or pursuit situations. By creating this <br />distinction, it is hoped that it will be easier for <br />agencies to realistically assess the capabilities <br />of each vehicle. <br />Each vehicle is subjected to six major tests <br />and evaluations. The results are weighted to <br />reflect the relative importance of each attri- <br />bute as related to MSP operational require- <br />ments. Exhibit 1 lists the tests and point <br />scores. MSP scores each vehicle's overall <br />performance, reviews the manufacturer's <br />bid price, and calculates a final score for <br />each vehicle using a sophisticated formula <br />that combines both factors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.