HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0314.079 1996-1998 ~%X<l.
~4~•~ ~~i
JAMES Y. ARAKAKI ~ ~ . Phon
` ~ e: (8UR) 961-~,_7
l~pllllflJ? b L~~E4tj111~ C~1~14'1
- F.-~X: (fi08) 969-:~'_'~~~
F p!
co<<:v~r~~ c ~~>r~c~~.
Counhi n/ Ha,raii
Hnn~~~ii Gnnrti~ Ruildiri~
35 Aupuni Shut
Hilo, Hurvnii gb7?~i ,
r.
August 24, 1998
TO: Wayne Carvalho
Police Chief
FROM: James Y. Arakaki
Chair
RE: Statewide Marijuana Eradication Task Force Grant
Project No. 96-DB- l 3
Resolution No. 94-97
I am in receipt of your memorandum to Legislative Auditor Connie Kiriu dated June 23,
1998.
Although the Council approved County Project Number 96-DB- l3 subject to a condition
that some of the funds be expended on a program review of the marijuana eradication
program, your memorandum indicates that the Police Department has not expended any
of its grant funds on such a review.
In light of pending Resolution No. 310-98, please advise us as to your position regarding
the following question:
Is the Police Department obliged to comply with conditions imposed in a
resolution?
Your response by August 31, 1998, would be appreciated.
cc: Council Members (w/ Carvalho memorandum)
;e,:
~ ~d'o: ~ Jam' - - _ -
_ _ AUG ' F tA98--
B IM
4
+M -
COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION AUTF{ORIZING THE COUNTY OF HAWAII TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, PURSUANT TO HRS 46-7, FOR A STATEWIDE MARIJUANA ERADICATION GRANT.
WHEREAS, the United States of America through the State Department of the Attorney General Crime Prevention
and Justice Assistance Division, is desirous of providing funding for expenses to conduct marijuana missions; and
WHEREAS, the Hawaii County Police Department is ready and willing to proceed with its obligations to conduct
marijuana missions; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 46-7 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, the Federal government may enter into
agreements with the Council of the County of Hawaii providing the expenditures or receipt of funds or for other assistance;
and
WIiEREAS, public concerns on the effectiveness of the marijuana eradication program warrants a more
comprehensive program review of the funding in operations of the program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII that it requires as
a condition of County Project Number 96-DB- 13 and its accompanying gran[ agreement that some of the funds be expended
on a program review of the marijuana eradication program. The program review shall be submitted to the Council within 90
days of the grant's termination or sooner.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Honorable Stephen K. Yamashiro is hereby authorized and designated to
i in the name of the County Project Number 96-DB-13, which will effectuate these purposes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Clerk is hereby directed to forward copies of this resolution to said
Mayor Yamashiro, the Chief of Police, and any other interested governmental agencies.
Dated at Hilo, Hawaii, this 2rx1 day of Julv , 1997.
t 'T,~iOpUCEl3~Y:
,
COUNCILMEMBER, C NTY OF HAWAII I
COUNTY COUNCIL _ ROLL CALL VOTE
County of Hawaii AYES NOES ABS EX
Hilo, Hawaii ARAKAKI X
CHUNC
I hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION was by the LE[THEAD-TODD _
vote indicated to the right hereof adopted by the COUNCIL of [he RAY
County of Hawaii on July 2, 1997 REYNOLDS
SANTANGELO
ATTEST: SMITH
/ TYLER yt
YAGONG
\ Reference C- 314.07/Cotmcil
OU RK CHAIRMAN & PRESIDING OFFICER RESOLUTION NO. 9A 9
(Draft 2)
p~tV Oi H
C ' ~.r,~ ~~y
y6rf~, Wayne G. Carvalho
Stephen K. Yamashiro ~ ~ i, Police Chief
Mayor _ ,
' James S. Correa
wi't'-w. i!S'
Sri os e~~' Deputy Police Chief
(i~~uztfg u~ ~ttfuttit
POLICE DEPARTMENT
399 Kapiolani Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720.3998
(808) 935-337] Fax (808) 96]-2702
June 23, 1998
TO CONNIE KIRIU, LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
FROM 'E G. CARVALHO, POLICE CHIEF
SUBJECT: MARIJUANA ERADICATION PROGRAM REVIEW
The Statewide Marijuana Eradication Task Force Grant, Project
No. 96-DB-13, terminates on June 30, 1998. Resolution No.
94-97 dated July 2, 1997, requires that a program review of the
marijuana eradication program be submitted to the County
Council within 90 days of the grant's termination.
On May 19, 1998, Acting Lieutenant Henry Tavares and Accountant
Nori Tanaka of our Vice Section and Finance Division,
respectively, met with Finance Director Harry Takahashi and
reviewed the minutes of a June 16, 1997, Finance Committee
meeting in which Resolution No. 94-97 was discussed.
On Page 163 of the minutes (enclosed), Council Member
Leithead-Todd was quoted as saying, "that part of the funds be
expended in conjunction with the Legislative Auditor's Office
on a program review of the marijuana eradication program." She
further explained that the length of time was required because
the Legislative Auditor's Office indicated that it would take
anywhere from six to nine months to conduct a program review
and would imagine that some time would be spent observing
and/or monitoring the operations.
We take this to mean that the Council's interpretation was that
the responsibility for conducting the program review was
directed to the Legislative Auditor. As a result of this, the
Police Department is willing to assist your office in the
preparation of this report.
Memo to Connie Kiriu, Legislative Auditor
June 24, 1998
Page 2
To obtain clarification regarding utilizing grant funds to
conduct a program review and/or an audit, Lieutenant Chadwick
Fukui of the Hilo Vice Section, on June 6, 1998, contacted Ms.
Earline Yokoi, Planning Specialist, Crime Prevention and
Justice Assistance, Department of the Attorney General.
Ms. Yokoi informed Lieutenant Fukui that grant funds could be
used for a program review and/or an audit, however, all
activities and/or expenditures need to occur during the
respective project period. She added that funds from one grant
project cannot be used for any other projects' expenditures.
Ms. Yokoi added that prior to utilizing grant funds for these
purposes, a budget proposal, or amended budget proposal, needs
to be submitted to the Attorney General's office for approval.
As such, funds from the present Marijuana Eradication Task
Force grant cannot be used for a program review and/or audit in
that funds have already been expended and the grant period will
be soon terminated on June 30, 1998.
Lieutenant Fukui was also informed by Ms. Yokoi that earlier
this year, the Attorney General's Office received a letter from
Harry Takahashi, Director of Finance, County of Hawaii. This
letter, dated February 25, 1998 (enclosed), stated that an
audit of federal expenditures under grants 94-DB-20 (Statewide
Narcotics Task Force - grand terminated), 95-DB-17 (Statewide
Marijuana Eradication Task Force - grant terminated), and
96-DB-13 (Statewide Marijuana Eradication - grant still
ongoing, to be terminated on June 30, 1998) was conducted. As
a result, the independent auditors, Deloitte & Trouche, LLP,
did not have any audit findings and/or question costs for said
grants.
Ms. Yokoi related that this "single organization-wide" audit
meets the requirements of OMB Circular A-133 (enclosed), and
that the Attorney General's Office has accepted these audits
for all four counties, as well as other agencies receiving
federal grants they are charged with.
Ms. Yokoi added that prior to awarding grants, concept papers
submitted by the requesting agencies and/or organizations are
closely reviewed and scrutinized by the Attorney General's
Office and the Governor's Committee on Crime which is the
decision-making body that determines who receives grants. This
includes reviewing accomplishments of goals and objectives of
previous grant projects, and it would be unlikely that an
agency be awarded a grant if these accomplishments were not met.
On June 6, 1998, Lieutenant Fukui also spoke to Group
Supervisor Robert Aiu, the State of Hawaii Domestic Cannabis
Enforcement/Suppression Program (DCE/SP) coordinator for the
Memo to Connie Kiriu, Legislative Auditor
June 24, 1998
Page 3
Drug Enforcement Administration. When asked whether grant
funds from this program could be used to conduct a program
review and/or audit, G/S Aiu related that these funds are
specifically for operational expenses and, more recently, for
Demand Reduction programs or activities.
G/S Aiu added that every year, prior to awarding grant funds
(under the DCE/$P), program directors and coordinators,
nationwide, reviews previous grant programs. Accomplishments
of specified goals and objectives, as well as conformance of
financial guidelines and restrictions are taken into
consideration when determining whether an agency is awarded any
grant funds.
When asked about conducting a program review of our
department's marijuana eradication operations, G/S Aiu informed
Lieutenant Fukui that during the present, as well as past grant
periods, his office has reviewed the monthly statistics and
financial reports submitted by our department, and as a result,
has felt that a program review was not necessary.
Enclosed are copies of the two most recent final project
progress reports for the Statewide Marijuana Eradication Task
force (grant numbers 93-DB-12 and 95-DB-17), that were
submitted to the Attorney General's Office upon termination of
the respective projects.
Therefore, because of the funding sources' (grantors')
requirements and satisfaction with our reporting of
expenditures, we did not plan to contract out for this program
review.
If you have any questions or need further assistance in this
matter, please contact Lieutenant Chadwick Fukui at 961-2253.
CF:mh
cc: Councilman Curtis Tyler
Harry Takahashi, Finance Director
Enclosures
eE%ee%9e is:2a ryas
Audit lieporting Re., .,cements. Independent auditors should follow the requitnntents
prescribed in OM8 Circular A•133.
If the auditor becomes aware of illegal acts or other irregularities, prompt notice shall be k`,
given to recipient management officials above the level of involvement. The rocipient, in `a•/'
rum, shall promptly notify the cognizant Federal agency ofthe illegal acts or irregularities and
of proposed and actual actions, if any.
AlI awarding agency personnel have the responsibility to inform the Office of Professional
Responsibility and the office of Inspector General, DOJ, and State and local !aw enforcement
agencies or prosecuting authorities, as appropriate, of any lutown violations ofthe taw within
their respective area of
jurisdiction.
Audit casts for audits not acquired or pt:rfonned in aceordance with OM$ Circular A 133 are
unallowable. If the grantee did not expend $300,000 or more in Federal funds in Sts frees)
year, but contracted with a certified public accountant to porform an audit; these costs may
not be charged to the grant.
Failure to Comply. Failure to have audits performed as requited may result in dte
withholding of new awards and/or withholding of funds or change in the method of payment
on active grants.
Audit Threshold:
l . Non-Faders! entities that expend $300,000 or more in Federal funds (from all sources }
including pass-through su6awards) in the organization &scal year (12 month ttrrnatounti
reporting period) shall have a single organisation-wide conducted in atxotdance with
the provisions of OM13 Circular A-133.
2. Non-Federal entities that expend less than $300,000 a year in Fedora) awatde are
exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year. Records must be available for
review or audit by appropriate officials including the Federal agency, pass-through
entity, and General Accounting pffice (GAO),
Due Dates for Audil Reports. Audits are due no Later than thirteen (13) months after t&e
close of each fiscal year during the term of the award, (For fiscal years beginning on/after
July 1, 1998, audit reports arc due nine (9) after the close of the fiscal year,) ~
Audit Compliance. Techniques to use to determine recipient compliance With Federal
requirements when an organization-wide audit is not conducted include:
1. Obmining audits frum recipient that were made in accordance with the "Government
Auditing Standards."
2. Relying on previous audits performed on recipient's operations.
3. Desk reviews by program officials of project documentation.
4. Project audits by auditors ar auditors obtained by recipients,
lanusry 1998: Patt I[,; Clwpkr 19 1t0
bE2
;c;:
•~~?f• "4
Stephen K. Yatnashirn
'~"Y"" Harry A. Takahashi
- rNrcetor
, 5.K. Schulte
Deputg
la~~zn#g ~uttii
DEPARTMENT OF IrINANCE
15 Aupuni $`r,~t, Roan La - Hllq Hawaii 9a7i0.4L52
(809) 961-8274 Fax (808) 96I-BL46
February Z5, 1998
Berlins Yokoi
Depaztlnent of the Attorney General
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance
425 Queen Street, First Floor
Honolulu, Hl 96813
Re: Single Audit of Federal Expenditures
This is to inform you that an audit of federal expenditures by the County of Hawaii
meeting the requirements of OMB Circulaz A-133 was completed by the County's
independent auditors, lleloitte & Touche LLP, for the fiscal year July i, 1996 through
June 30, ]997.
During that fiscal year, your agency pBOVided federal funds to the County on apass-
through basis far the program listed below:
Drug Control and System Improvement -Formula Crpttt
CFDA Number 16.579
Grant No./Award Amount: 94-DB-20 $ 43,875
95-DB-17 $113,625
96-17B-13 $108,294
There were no audit findings or questioned costs related to the above awatds pzaVia~ ~y
your agency, and the summary schcclule of prior audit findings did ntn address any ~p{t
findings related to federal awards provided by your agency.
Tf you have any questions, pJwse call Dixie Kaetsu, Controller, at (808) 961-8425.
Sincerely,
Ix.-~l~C~ ~L.~
H A, Taycahashi
Director of Finance
Cc: Wayne Carvalho, Chief of Police
FHB ~ $ ..1998
86%08198 15:24 801
June 8, 1998
TO: Lt. Chad Fukui
FROM; Earline Yokoi~i~
SUBJECT: Audit Requiretents
I am iltxing you a page from the ihderal Financial Guide, which is put ouC by the Office ofthe
Comptroller, U. S. Department of Justice.
Under Audit Reporting Requirements, lest paragraph, it is assumed that paying for the cost
of an audit with grant funds is allowable.
Under Audit Threshold, I it states that entities that expend more than $300,000 in tbderal
funds shall have a single organization-wide audit. The Attorney General's Office has accepted a
county-wide audit for the four counties. We have not required the ponce departments or the
prosecutors offices to conduct single agency audhs.
For FY 97 (7/1 /9 6-6/3 019 7), the County of Hawaii, Department ofFinance, submitted a letter
on 2!28/98, elating that there were no audit findings for the Hawau County Police Department
projects funded during that period. This letter is also being faxed to you.
If you havc additional questions regarding this matter, please call me at 586-1389.
Powt-It°Fax Note 7671 oats t.f5 q~ aJ
rt, Ld~ - ~da~s. C4 k,,t,~_ F1O1^ 4w,n.<n.t,~,V
co ~oeq. N ~ 0 0~ V f Ce. A{r~ C P S/F
rn~,«« 941-ZL~.$3 " `~rgt.~ 13
Fmt N q c l , L37 Y F"`" 55x4 - 19`13
8b~08~88 15:24
SxMM
Wayne G. Carvalho
~ Poliu Chief
Stephen K. Yamashiro
`N°y0' James S. Correa
~•ei•w~'M~` Deputy Police Chief
ft~oixnfg rid ~ttfuttii
POLICE DEPARTMENT
349 Kapiolani Street Hilo, Hawaii %720-3998
_ ~ (80819353311 • Fax (808) 961-2702
September 2, 1997
Ms. Lari Koqa
Administrator
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance
Department of the Attorney General
425 Queen Street, First Floor
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Dear Ms. Koga:
Enclosed is the f~nlll project progress report for the Statewide
Marijuana Eradication Task Force grant, Project No. 95-DB-17.
Should you need further information, please contact Lieutenant
Chadwick K. Fukui of our Vice Section at (808) 961-2253.
We apologize for the delay in submitting this report.
The assistance and support we received from you and your staff
in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
WAYNE G. CARVALHO
POLTCE CF.I«'1'
ACTING F°~'?;.ICx`; ~~:.~.P
CKf' : ?°h
Encl~~sure
APPROVED:OMB NO.1121-0113 (EXPAES 12.31-95)
,U.S..Deparut>trd of,lwtloe ; .
' . °CIfIOe-Ol Juatioa.Progtams.i ,_r ~'.e A~ ~
8urraY of auatlca Aesbtane:
PART A • GEHERAL:PROJiECT RrffOAMATION ? `
7ha State Administrative .4parrry wil atrbmh this report b tYle Bureau d Justice Asahhnw at tfw and d each pram yeu or Ma
termination of a subprant projoct whichever conrnr lust it may ba optionat7y sutt>rrrkfed on a quarterly brash. The reportY
purpose h b collect perlomrance inlamatcn on subprant rec~pierrfs arrd projects. 7hh data is used Aor proprun actlviry rePori*
to the AdminhVatwn, the Conpross, and Mw SYuee.
Noto: 1) The appropriate Pert B form for this propcPs lagblative purpose ens must be attached >b fhb Part A
2) Unbsa apecifiealy requested, project ariNRks sudt as arrests and oonvidons should only irclude chow aocumng
during the current raportetq period (whim may ba either a quarterly or an annual roport).
3) Except for muhipb choice questions, dank arrtries wNl be iMarpreted u zeroes. Enter an •M• for mbeinp or urtlcrtown
data.
For addhbnal help In compbting this form, check the attached Inrrtructbna. For further assisbnea, pll your Stab
Administratlve Agency or the BJA Stab & Local Asstatanq Ohriskm.
1. Project 2. Federal Fbnl 3. Projerx
GrantNumbar 95-DB-17 YaarofFunds _ TRk Statewide Marijuana Eradication Task Fo e
4. Currem Roport Period • Starting Month/Year.(cude one; Jan, ~ July Oct. )!19 96
Ending Momh/Ysar (eirch orw: Jan. Apr. Jufy Oct )/19~- (March)
5. SulagrantoefRecipiem Contact Information and RopoR Completion Date
Aganry Name: Hawaii Police Department
Address line t: 349 Kapiolani Street Address line 2:
CiryiState/Zp: Hi 10 . _jJ,L 86790 Project Phone including aroa coda (808 1 961.2253
..omaet Person: Lt. Chadwick Fukui Report Compktgn Data: DS / 26 / 97
6a. What b the target aroa of the project? (check only one) 7a. Wsa training a apedfic budget Rem for thin project?•YM Y
® Statewide 7b. R •Yea' iD 7a, was the training provided by:
? Regional/multijurisdictional aSl Poor aubtance/experienced practRfoners
? ~u~, LK! OWide professional inatructoUconsuRam
? Municipality ®Projea staff
~ State training staff
6b. Pkau list the specific counties carved by this propct ? Other (apecily)
(R more space is needed, attach a wparate ahwl)
Hawaii County 8a. What typo d waluation/aswssmem b planned for this
project? (rhedc atl that appy)
Honolulu Citv and County [~AdminbtraWeoverapht/propreaareports
Maui County ? Pro)od abft-produced report
? Outside agency
Kauai County
8b. What fs the evaluation/assessmem's lunding source?
(check au that appy)
~1 Project ? Nonproject
9a. Do you antidpate a continuation of this project?-YM Y
9b. R •Yes' to 9a, what sources are you requesting funds for future support? (chock en that apply)
B,)A Federal gram l~ State general fund f~ Local governmem general lured ~ Asso± for}eBuros
? Other Federal funding ? Private funding ? Other (sexily)
OJP FORM 43102 (REV. 8-92)
Department of the Attorney General
Resource Coordination Division
PROGRESS REPORT
Project No.: 95-DB-17 Project xitle: Statewide Marijuana Eradication Task Force
Agency: HdWd11 Police Department, 349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Person completing Report: Lt. Chadwick K. Fukui Phone: (808) 961-2253
Project Period: 04-01-96 to 03-31-97 Report Period: 04-01-96 to 03-31-97
Date of Report: 08-28-97
Please address the following areas and attach the report to this form.
A. Provide a brief description of the program.
B. List each goal and objective, and describe
the progress made towards achieving each of them.
C. Describe the program activities to date.
D. Report performance indicators that document the
accomplishment of the objectives. If this is the final
report, describe how the project impacted/improved the
criminal justice system.
S. Describe any problems encountered, how they impacted the
program and how they were resolved.
To Be Submitted Every 6 Months and at the End of the Project Period
AG/RCD :11 9/01/94
STATEWIDE MARIJUANA ERADICATION TASK FORCE
PROJECT NO. 95-DB-17
PROGRESS REPORT
1. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
The cultivation of high-grade marijuana continues in the
County of Hawaii, and is a continuing law enforcement
problem.
During recent eradication missions an increase in the
number of marijuana plants and plots were detected.
"Hawaii-grown" marijuana continues to be in steady demand
by out of state "dealers" and consumers. Hawaii County
continues to be recognized as a supplier to the rest of the
State of Hawaii, as well as the continental United States.
The program entails manual eradication operations to reduce
its availability. Hawaii County received inter-agency
assistance which resulted in a State-wide coordinated
effort which proved to be effective. There were no
herbicidal eradication missions conducted by Hawaii County
during this period.
Enforcement efforts led to the identification, arrest and
prosecution of those individuals responsible for both
indoor and outdoor cultivation operations and distribution
of marijuana, as well as seizure and forfeiture of property.
Training for personnel participating in our operations were
provided to ensure personnel safety, maintain quality
investigations, and professional conduct.
Hawaii County Police personnel participated in joint task
force meetings along with representatives from the other
County, State and Federal law enforcement agencies. The
meetings were for the purpose of planning and coordinating
inter-agency intelligence, enforcement and operations.
2. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:
Eradication of marijuana, utilizing coordinated
inter-agency efforts, to suppress cultivation operations
and reduce product availability is the primary goal of the
Statewide Marijuana Eradication Task Force. Other basic
goals include Coordinated efforts in developing and
improving standardized eradication techniques, equipment
and procedures.
Thirty-two (32) Counter-Cannabis Field Operations were
conducted during this grant period. Our personnel also
assisted other law enforcement agencies within the State of
Hawaii in their operations.
A total of 158,138 marijuana plants and 55.6 pounds of
dried processed marijuana were recovered. The following is
a list of some noted events:
a. 4,043 marijuana plots were identified and plants
eradicated.
b. 868 cannabis-related cases were developed.
c. 167 cultivation and 562 cannabis-related arrests, for a
total of 729 arrests made.
d. Investigation of four indoor operations were initiated.
e. Assets, vehicles, currency and real property valued at
$257,000 were seized for forfeiture.
We continue to send our personnel to training such as the
Western States Intelligence Network (WSIN), California
Narcotic Officers Association (CNOA) and other sessions to
remain current on technological and investigative
approaches, as well as keeping up with current issues
regarding marijuana.
Other goal and objective achievements are previously
addressed in the Program Description narrative.
3. PROGRAM ACTIVITIES:
We have identified and arrested individuals who were
identified as large-scale cultivators and distributors.
Our efforts have led to inter-agency and multi-jurisdiction
investigations, some of which are pending. Most
investigations entail execution of search warrants. The
following is a list of notable investigations:
a. On March 2, 1996, 94 growing marijuana plants and 22.6
pounds of marijuana seeds were recovered during the
execution of a search warrant on a residence in Captain
Cook, Kona.
b. On June 21, 1996, 473 cultivated plants were recovered
during the execution of a search warrant at a residence
in Black Sands Subdivision, Puna. The suspect, a
- 2 -
postal worker, was believed to have utilized the postal
service to ship marijuana from Hawaii to the
Continental U. S.
c. On July 17, 1996, 472 cultivated plants were recovered
during execution of a search warrant upon a residence
in the upper Hilo town area. Forfeiture proceedings of
the property are pending.
d. On August 28, 1996, 506 growing marijuana plants were
recovered at a residence in Honomolino, Kona.
Forfeiture proceedings on the property are pending.
e. On September 13, 1996, 291 cultivated plants were
recovered at a residence in Kealakehe, Kona. This was
the second time cultivated plants were recovered on the
property. Forfeiture proceedings of the property are
pending.
f. On October 24, 1996, 395 cultivated plants and 4.6
pounds of dried processed marijuana were recovered at a
residence in Hawaiian Acres, Puna.
q. On November 18, 1996, an indoor growing operation was
discovered during a search warrant. As a result 110
plants were seized. Investigations revealed that the
suspect had 3-4 previous indoor growing operations.
h. On February 4, 1997, 634 growing marijuana plants were
recovered at a residence in Kalopa, Hamakua.
Forfeiture proceedings are pending.
i. On February 8, 1997, 140 cultivated marijuana plants
were seized at a residence in Kailua, Kona. Also
located and seized were 18 homemade "nail board" booby
traps.
j. On February 21, 1997, 3.5 pounds of dried processed
marijuana and two weapons were recovered during a
search warrant at a residence in Wainaku, Hilo. On
March 8, 1997, approzimately six pounds of dried
processed marijuana was purchased from the same
suspect. A second search warrant was executed on the
residence resulting in the recovery of 135 cultivated
plants and approximately seven pounds of dried
processed marijuana. Forfeiture proceedings of the
property are pending.
- 3 -
4. OUTCOME/IMPACT INDI ATORS:
Marijuana related arrests and seizures have increased from
recent years. This grant has allowed our department to
continue its efforts in the areas of
eradication/enforcement efforts of State and Federal
marijuana laws.
This grant has enabled our personnel to receive necessary
and current training in various complex aspects of
marijuana investigations and eradication techniques.
This grant has also enabled our department to continue its
statewide task force efforts with other County, State and
Federal law enforcement police agencies within the State of
Hawaii. This has assisted in maintaining successful
eradication operations, as well as increasing the
apprehension and conviction of individuals and/or
organizations involved in large scale marijuana
operations. These efforts have resulted in several
successful inter-agency, multi-jurisdictional
investigations.
Additionally, our Vice officers continue to maintain an
education program which remains an integral part of the
grant. Our officers continue to be in demand as speakers
at schools and other community organizations.
5. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED:
No significant problems encountered.
- 4 -
Approvad:OMB NO. 1121-0113 (EXPIRES 12.31•g5)
a>4 ~ ''C
f
iY~
k r $
Max, ~ .ce .
s' ~ ~e .~..a.~t,~,v'Yarv
V. c
I~T~INDARQ PARTB~~E>tO~pMIAHCE1NDlCATA1~~t ~~88f1ENT'"
Purpose Area: Standard Part 8 Form to be used forthafolbwinq Lagisfativa Purpose Areas:
1. Demand Reduction Educa>jon
4. Community and Noghboritood
5. Disrupting IUlcft Commora
7. (A) Oporatbnal Elfadiwnoss o1 Law Enforcement
(B) Antltenorism Plans
9. Financial Invostigativo Progrsma
12. Prison Industry
14. Jurors, VYrtnossos, and Yrctims of Crimp
15. (A) Improve Druq Control Tachnobgy
(B) Criminal and Justice Information Systems
16. Innovative Programs
17. Drug Control and Public Housing
18. Domoatb and Family V'alenco
19. Drug Control Evaluation
Please answer these questbns on the attached form or provide a final project assessment:
1. Provide a narrative description of the program lrom available program documents.
. Identify program goals and spocUic objectives.
3. Idomily program activRios put in place to implement the program. U possble, the program activities should bo linked to the
spodfie objectives o1 the program.
4. Report porlonnance indicators which document the aowmplishmont of objedivoa for the current reporting period which is
a4her a quartery or an annual report
Purpose of tf» Standard Pert B Assoasmorrt
First, a program descriptbn is slways useful, and can in AseM form the basis for the romainirq steps of the study. Tho
idemification of goals and objectives is not as easy a teak as R may appear, but a comprohonsivo program dosaiptbn helps a
groat deal
A Goal is the end toward which effort is directed. Program goals sFauld be clearly stated and roaliatb. Objectives are the
imermodiate effects or rosulla to be achieved by the program in pursuing ifs ultimate goal Objoctfvos ropresont the moans by
which program managers determine the extent program goale aro being aocomplishod. h is imperative that objecvos bo both
aehlevable and measurable. Like goals, objective should bo stated in terms of outcome (expected effects or rosutts).
Tho most important step to understanding a program's implemerrtatbn, however, is t}r knowledge gained by iderrtifyinq program
activities that are expected to produce results which meet the stated goat and objectives. The program must have n roelistic
chance of attaining its specified goals and objectives, % it is Lo bo implemented. Thoroforo, the cause-and-aHoct relationship
between program activities and goals and objectives must bo idem~ed and assessed.
Prosily, the presentation of performance indicators provides us with a means for judgirq if the overall program or any of ks
ctivities could realisticaly be implemented in a different bastion, or under dilferem circumstances.
OJP FORM 4310/1 (Rev. &92)
Approved OM8 NO. 1121-0113 (EXPIRES 12-3195)
4 ~
Mp 4 C ~ 9~ >A~ a ~-17~~Y•.~y~oUuu~~ ~p~ !~~p~
- i
y° Co?s~ ~`S{t'y YAM:" ~~r ~I~'1II "
li01C!»
Full Program 17t1e: Muftijurisdictional task loroe programs which integram FideraR stall, and beat drug law enforoement
agendas and prosecutors for the purpose oI enhancirp interaperrry ooordinatbn and inte9lpsnae and /aaFfatirp mult~irriadicYiorul
imrostigafions.
Unlace speeflially ngwated, project actlvhlea such as unats and oonvbtlona should only Include those ooeurrtrtg
during the currant reporting period (whbh may be aRher a quarterly or an annual nportl. Exwpt for multiple ehobe
questions, blank ergries will be imerpreted as zeroes. Eller an 'M' for misairq or unknown data. For addklorul Mfg h
completing this form, cheek the attached Instructbns.
State Coda: _ Project Gram s: 95-DB-17 Fed. Fiscal Year: 19 = - Report Stag Date: (momhyear) 04/19 96
1. M Federal agencies era involved in this project, check all of 2. Please rank the project's too throe orioriNes tram the folbwirq
the tolbwing hoses that apply: with a '1• as first priority to a '3' as third prbrity:
ATF ? INS 3 Distnbutbn - ImpoRatbn
? Coast Guard 07 IRS - Bet 8°I°i Money laundering
Finanaal badting ~ Manulacturinq
? Customs ? LECC Gap cuhivatbn _ Official corruption
f~1 DFJ? U.S. Attorney . Dwersron -Gang activity
YiokM crime
? FAA ~ U.S. Marshals Service -Other (list)
? FBI ? Other (fiat)
3a. Project Investgatbn Activity 3b. Investigation Status at End of Reporting Period
• ct Case Status i of cases
:five Cases during Reporting Period eases Cbsed during reporting period
Initiated before reporting perod starting date Dropped during reporting period
Initiated during reporting poriod Ting at end d roportirq period
Total active cases -8'6~
4a. Persons Arrested for Drug Offenses by Type of Offense and by Drug-Related Activity (K detailed information is not available,
list totals as appropriate. See instructions about applying hierarchy rules to the table's rows and columns betoro entering this
data.)
Offense Type Buying Cultivate. DistJSell Possessn. Transprtn. Using Other Total
Cocaine
Crack
Can"°~ 729
Opiates
Stimulams
Depreasams
Halludnogena
Muhipie/other drugs
Unknown drugs
Total 729
,M
OMenaa ns Arrested by Drug Offense end by ViokrR ~ ~ ~ ~`°~~~r)'6 ' ~ ai
Violern Nonviolent Total ~ ' °ju'
Ng ~::,z. x~
D 729 ...a~. ~ : .
~
Nondrug wc"~`~a;:a:~:. »;zn T.u..~a.
~tal Persons
ARested 7 ~ y a~~~ wk ~~xa~~xxb~,,KN
OJP FORM 43102 (REV. 8-92) B1-4
Yn4.~T ~ r ~ . 2
~,~y~~r ¢ i JA
° SR~g<.:~~.y~~TfGf'Y~iif .na3,:U"31 .p v°' ~Y~{$$..
a , i?air s ~ui~ro~ u~f~. `TASK ~Jl~,
5. Parsons Arrested by RacerEthniciry and Seeded Characteristip (M detailed §ffonnation is not avaNabk, Ibt totab e
approprtate.)
Se: Aoe (n vearsl Criminal History
Repeal
Raeer£thniaty Male Female <18 18+ First Af(ender ONender Unkrawn
Caucasian _~Statisti~e are no~available~_
Biadc
Hispanic
Native American
Other
Unknown
Total
6a. Amount of Drugs Removed (Estimate weights if necessary. See instructions for drug type dainitbna.)
Quantity Standard Unit ARemate Unit of
Drug Type of Measure Measure
Cocaine ~
Crack ~
Cannabis 55.6 tbs
Opiates
StimulaMS DU
Depressants DU _
Hallucinogens DU
4ultipla/other drugs kg
tknown kg
6b. tl marijuana was eradicated, indicate number of plants desVOyed.
158,138 Sinsemilla WiW (dRdtweed)
Hydroponics _ Other
7. Assets Seizure and ForteRUres B. Distnbution of Forfeituro Proceeds
Secures Forfeitures 0 9G m project100s: to other errtRies
Asset Type Number Value Number Value 9. Does the project include speday
Vehicles 1 5,000 asspned prosecutorial staff4-YM N
ves8a:
Aircraft
Currency (R of inadents) _L 38.439-
Other financial instruments
Real property i ~t 4. inn
weapons
Other
Total 9 257 , 639
B1-5
r e ~
d ~ ~ ~~reaV~1 ~~J~W~y vv)
' ..txLf n'v
Aii.:Y1
i wmt y S
_:...r.
~ PART 8 - PURPOSE ~NEA ~J1UL
10a. Comided Parsons by Druq Clfense and by Drug•Related Adivay (K detailed informatlon N not available, tbt tatah as
appropriam. Sea instructbns about appyinq hierarohy rules to the table's rows and columns bdon errterinp fhb data.)
Offense Type Buying Cuuivatrt. Diat./Seu Possessn. Transprtn. Using Other Total
Cocaine (Statistics are not available)
Crack
Cannabis
Opiates
Stimulants
Depressams
Halludnogens
Multiple/other drugs
Unknown drugs
Total
by ug by
tOb. Persons Convicted Dr Offense and V'rok~ M~~
OHeme ~
ry~te the number of persons reeeivmg gui ~ :a~~`~
verdicts of offense. ~ '
Vaiem Nonviolent Total a~
Drug Statistics not available) „>~4~<k
Nondrug "
h~~
Total
ti a ~.s a
e. Parsons Sentenced by Drug Offense end by Type of Sentence (M detailed Irtfotmatbn ie not available, Bst totaft ae
appropriate. See instructions about applying hierarchy rules to the table's rows and columns beforo emering this data)
Offense Type Prison Jail Probatbn Jau and Probatbn
Number Median Number Median Number Median Number
Cocaine Statistics are not available~_
Crack
Cannabis
Opiates
Stimulams
Depressams
Hauudnogens
Multiple/other drugs
Unknown drugs
Total Persons
11b. Persons Semenced by Offense Type (tf detailed information is not avalabte, lint totab as appropriate.)
Offense Type Prison Jail Probation Jau and Probatbn
Number Median Number Median Number Median Number
DrugoHerraesonty Statistics are not available~_
Drug-related violent
offenses
Nondrug vioent
offenses
tier offenses
.tal Persons
Bl-6
' ewR~'F ~ v
hm M s xY q, b ~,.P+~aY ''yy~ r Av 9
w~ 0 2 ~ 'A~ City
a~~ ?Y F~~ . .
„ ~ ,„Y .PART ~ ~.~UAP~f~ AA~.~..~.~7e~fr~~q~~~$K =V~ ~
.2a. Persona Sentenced by Drug Offense Type and by Typo of Somanw - ContinuwJ (M detailed information is not available, list
totab as appropriate. Soo insuuctpns about eppyinq hiwarchy rules to the fade's rows and columns before errterinq this data.)
Offense Type Sus~nded Other Community Sorvico Fnes Total
Number Number Number Average Number Average Number
Cocaine ~statisti~
area
era not available)
Crack
Cannabis
Opiates
Stimulams
Depressants
Halludnogens
Multiple/other drugs
Unknown drugs
Totai Persons
12b. Persons Semenced by Offense Type - Cominued (ff detailed information b not available, list totab as appropriate.)
Offense Type Sus~nded Other Community Service Fnes Total
Number Number Number Average Number Average Number
Druq offenses ony Statistics are not avai lab) e
Drug-related volent
offenses
Nondrug violent
offenses
her offenses
total Persons
NOTES: (Enter any qualifying or explanatory information for the preceding responses that should be noted. Please idomify to
which questions each note applies.)
Bl-1
,1c w~~{ p..,~~~ Approved:cweNO.,,z,-0na.(ExPfRES,z•a,-gs).
•'fJ 0.?~ma,w Vl VllNlli~ - K 5 4
/~~p~~ ,~j `~~~y~~ ~y~ r w ~ l x Ryn } ~ " pit
V ,rINIRi Ptnpratn~ ~ M. A! R~
Bruaw d Jwticra Asafatattcs . .F s t
.:;PROOREfSB IREPOAT".~~`
N?`x%: a'.~a'~.,~"+x> "u. Sa „
~ QF~ 4i~'r
PART B • PURPOSE.AREA SeTAROETRIO 00YESTICSOURCES,~x d~
Full Program Trtk: Programs dosgned b tatyet the domssrYe soureoa o/ conhosed and ibpal subarmon, such at proeursa
chemicals. div°rsilied pharmaeautieab. Band°stina laboratories. and cannabis wMivaffort
Unlep speeHlatly rsqueated, project aethrhbs such o amsts and eonvktlons should only hduda Chow oocurtktg
during the currant reporting period (whkh may be shhsr a quarterly or an annual report} Except for multiple dtoiw
questions, blank emriea will be imerpreted as zeroes. Eller an 'M' for missing or urrlcrtown den. For addNlonal help M
completing this farm, ehedt the attached Inatrtretlons.
State Code: _ Project Gram s: 95-DB-17 Fed. Fueal Ysar.,fi_ Report Start Dan: (morditlyear) ~4 H9~
1. fl Federal agencies are involved in this 2. The prindpal target(s) d this 3. The project's investigatbn outcomes:
project. check aA d the lolbwinq that apply: projekx is (ehedk all that apply)
[J ATF ? INS lSi cannabis cukNatbna Irnestlgatbn Outcomes ResuMs
? Coast Guard ~ IRS ? diwrtsd pharmaceuticals i~~ egistrarrts
? Customs ? LECC O dendestine laboratories s d arrosb made
dU DEA l~ U.S. Attorney ? precursor cheminla s d indCtmeds received
? FAA l~ U.S. Marshals Service ? other (spedly) s
d~ik°rauro actbn°
? F81 ? Other
4. For clandestine Iab projects only, roport 8. For marijuana eradication projects, indicate the folowing outcomes:
on projed outcomes CuhNatW
i~estigation Outcomes Resuks Eradicatbn Outcomes Senaimilla Other Dhchweed
s d labs investgated s d plots spMed 4.043
s d Iabs shut down s d plots eradicated ~,1]r~3,
s d plants eradicated ,
5. M projed includes comrolling procuraor s d groenhouselndoor
chemicals, has a precursor chemical operatbna seized
tracking system been devebped: Ibs d buWprocesaed
Yes No Being devebped mariuana seized 55.6
7. Training activity results Ba. Does this projed cornan a public awaroneWmedia component?-YM _
= d 8b. M'Yes' to 8a, please indicate which d ilia following elemerrts ere utilized
Training recpiems persons (ehedk all that apply):
law enforcemem snit 17 Pubik service anrrourramerds _ Hotline for receipt d information
regulatory staff ~ Reward program X Pubik inlormation/disaeminatbn
prosecutorial stall _ Other.
dher:
9. Number d arrests by type al charge 10. List the tool number and value d acted and forfeited nondrug assets
3efzed f-oAeited
s d Number t Vales Number i Value
Chargetypea uroats Motorwhices 1 5,000
cannabis cuhivatbn 167 Vessels
diverted pharmaceuticals Alraaft
etandestine Tabs Currorwy (incidents) 7 38.439
precursor chemicals Other financial
muRipla/other charges F~~ instrumems
Real Property 1 214.200
Weapons
aner ~ 27.639
Q1P FORM 4310/2 (REV. 8-92) gl_g
OOO~tV Os M,~'
yla,,,., Wayne G. Carvalho
Stephen K. Yamashiro c, Police Chief
Mauor James S. Correa
~4\•o~•w~.M~ Drpul4 Pulicc Chirf
(t~nunfg ~ttfuuti
POLICE DEPARTMENT
349 Kapiolani Street • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-3996
(808) 935-3311 Pax (808) 961-2702
November 21, 1995
Ms. Pam Seto
Planning Specialist
Resource Coordination Division
Department of the Attorney General
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Dear Ms. Seto:
Enclosed is our final progress report for the Statewide
Marijuana Eradication grant, Project No. 93-DB-12.
Should you need further information, please contact Lieutenant
Charles M. Chai, Jr. of our Vice Section at 961-2253.
We appreciate your assistance and support.
Sincerely,
WAYNE G. CARVALHO
POLICE CHIEF
JAM C EA
D PUTY POLICE CHIEF
AC POLICE CHIEF
CMC:lk
Enc.
Department of the Attorney General
Resource Coordination Division
PROGRESS REPORT
Project No.: 93-DB-12 Project Title: Statewide Marijuana Eradication
Agency: Hdwall Police Department, 349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Person Completing report: Lt. Charles M. Chaff, Jr. Phone: (808) 961-2253
Project Period: 07-01-94 to 09-30-95 Report Period: 01-01-95 to 09-30-95
Date of Report: November 21, 1995
Please address the following areas and attach the report to this form.
A. Provide a brief description of the program.
B. List each goal and objective, and describe
the progress made towards achieving each of them.
C. Describe the program activities to date.
D. Report performance indicators that document the
accomplishment of the objectives. If this is the final
report, describe how the project impacted/improved the
criminal justice system.
E. Describe any problems encountered, how they impacted the
program and how they were resolved.
To Be Submitted Every 6 Months and at the End of the Project Period
AG/RCD X11 9/01/94
~ c
PROGRESS REPORT
STATEWIDE MARIJUANA ERADICATION GRANT
Project No. 93-DB-12
Provide a brief description of the program
The eradication of domestic cultivated marijuana through manual and chemical
spray methods. The arrest and prosecution of those responsible for marijuana
cultivation at outdoor and indoor locations. The seizure of property derived
through proceeds of the marijuana business, and equipment and property used to
facilitate cultivation.
Provide continuance training to assure all personnel participating in the
operations are properly trained and experienced, and promote standardization of
all work practices.
Arrange for frequent task force meetings to promote interagency eradication
enforcement projects.
B. List each coal and objective and describe the progress made towards achieving
each of them.
In March and April of 1995, several rappel training sessions were conducted which
included the U.S. Marshal's Service. Our personnel attended the WSIN and CNOA
training conferences which exposed them to state of the art FLIR equipment and
other new technology and investigative approaches. DCE/SP (Domestic Cannabis
Eradication/Suppression Program) task force meetings are held on a regular basis.
The grant supported 19 "CounterCannabis Field Operations" (CCFO) where 84,675
cultivated plants were destroyed.
C. Describe the program activities to date.
Sixty-three people were arrested during several search warrant investigations,
andfive weapons were recovered during this grant period.
During a search warrant in Hawaiian Paradise Park, 4,044 marijuana plants were
concealed under a type of roof, and the plants only received partial sunlight.
Following the overnight surveillance of an outdoor marijuana field, DLNR and the
police arrested two brothers for illegally cultivating 307 marijuana plants on
State lands. The brothers entered the patch to water the plants during a
full-moon night. They attempted escape.
D. Report performance indicators that document the accomplishment of the
objectives. If this is the final report, describe how the project
impacted/improved the criminal justice svstem.
Interagency task force efforts, improved eradication methods, and the changes
made to our criminal and civil laws are the paramount reasons for the marijuana
shortfall in the State of Hawaii.
Grant funds have allowed the police to maintain a vigorous and proactive
eradication program. This program must continue, and we must not allow the
problem to return to the pre-1990 years.
E. Describe anv problems encountered, how they impacted the program and how they
were resolved.
No significant problems encountered.
APPROVED:OMB NO. 1121-0113 (EJ(PHES 121-95)
U.S. Dapatunart; al Jtntba x
'ONbcotJwtba.Ftoptama a~'~4
BYrrauaf JUa1lOa.Atgletifea.~ <`k ti
;PROGRESS REPORT
PART A • OENEAAL:ARWECT A~FOANA71ON '
The Stara Administrative Aganry wr7! submit this report to the Bureau d Justico Asahtarrca at the and d aaclr pant year or the
termination of a tubgrant project, tvhiclrawr occurs Brit h may ba optionally submktad on a quarbdy bash, fie report's
purpose rs b coUecr perlormarrca inlwmation on wbprant raapierns and prajscb. T1Sia data is used br proprem arxivity reports
to the Administration. ti'w Congress, and the SYataa.
Note: t) The appropriate Pert B form for this project's legislative purpose area must ba attached to this Part A
2) Unless specifically roquesled, Project adivitles strclt as artests and cortvid'nns should only include Chow aocurring
during the curtest reporting period (which may bo either a quarterly or an annual sport).
3) Except for muhiple choice questbns, blank araries wdl be ktterpreted as zeroes. Enter an 'AA' for mluing or unlvwwn
data.
For addhbnal help In completing this form, cheek the attached Inrrtruetbnt. Far further aaalstanca, call your Stets
Administnth!a Agency or the BJA State 6 Local Asslstanp Dhrlskut
t • prq~ 2. Federal Fisnl 3. Project
Grant Number 93-DB-12 Year of Funds Tkle Statewide Mari,iuana Eradication
4. Current Report Period -Starting MonthiYear.(csda one; (Jan) Apr, July Oct, yt9~
Ending Month/Year (eirre/aorw: Jan. Apr. July Oct )h9 95 (Sept)
5. SubgranteerFiecipient Contact IMormation and Report Completion Date
Agency Name: Hawaii Police Department
Address line l: 349 Kaoi0lani Street Address line 2:
City/StateiZip: Hi 10, Hawaii .96720 project phone including area code ( 8081 961 .2253
~...,~taa Person: Lt. Charles M. Chaff . Jr. Report Completion Data: 11121 / 95
6a. What u the target area of the projectT (check ony one) 7a. Was training a specific budget kem for thin project?•YM y
~ Statewide 7b. M'Yes• to 74 was the training provided by:
? Regional/multijurisdictional ~ Pwr asaislanee/experienced practitioners
? CquMy ~ oubide protaasional instructor/consultant
? Municipality ~1 project staff
fdl State training staff
6b. Pleau list the specrfic counties carved by Chia project ? Other (ttpecily)
(h more space u needed, attach a wparate sheet)
Hawaii County 8a. What type of watuatloNaswssment is plamed for this
projed7 (rhadc s1 that apply)
Honolulu City and County QS)AdmingtratiwoversighUprogreasreporta
Maui County ? Prof staff-produced report
? Outside agency
Kauai County
8b. What is the waluatioNawowment'sfusding source?
(ehedc all that apply)
® Project ? Nonprojed
9a. Do you antidpate a continuation of this project?-YM Y
9b. M 'Yes' to 9a, what sources are you requesting funds for future support? (check all than apply)
dSl t3JA Federal gram State general fund ~I Local governmertt general fund /lsset IorfeRures
? Other Federal funding ? Private funding ? Other(spec8y)
QJP FORM 43102 (REV. 8•L'2)
Approved: OMB NO. 1121.0113 (EXPIRES 12.31•g5)
3A Y t "~>^~Ix~ F~ may,.. Y5 M~~~~
~epettOttutf d Jutdo~~ ~ ~
rr . `
~ ~iptraffJnatiQe~Wgq ry~
` mS: t ri. ^r~~ItNN{I ~F~.... iNS{~.. ~.~3F~d~S~~'~",'a~°
ETA
DARDPART$:•PEAIrOHNAt~E1NDlCJt1';R}»>~:88198511
n "
Purpose Aroa: Standard Part B Form to be used for the fclbwirp Legislative Purpose Areas:
1. Demand Reduction Education
4. Community end Neghbortwod
5. Dbruptirrq Illicit Commerce
7. (A) Operatbnal Effectiveness of Law Enforcemem
(B) Arrtkenorbm Plans
9. Financial Irnestgative Programs
12. Prison Industry
14. Jurors, Wrtnesaes, and Victims of Crime
15. (A) knprow Druq Comrol Tecttnobgy
(8) Criminal and Justice Information Systems
16. Inrovative Programs
17. Drug Control and Public Housing
18. Domestic and Family Vwlence
tg. Drug Control Evaluation
Please answer these questions on the attached form cr provide a final project aaseasmem:
1. Provide a narrative description of the program from availabb program documents.
.entity program goals and specific objectives.
3. Identity program activities put in place to implement the program. k poasbk, the program ectivkies should be linked to the
specifx; objectives of the program.
4. Report performance indicator which document the aooomplbhmertt of objectives for the current reporting period which is
ekher a quarterly or an annual report
Purpose of the Standard Pert 8 Assessment
First, a program description is ahvays useful, and can in ibek form the bash for tfw remainirrq steps a( the study. The
identifieatbn of goals and objoctives is not as easy a task as k may appear, but a oomprohenaive program description helps a
great deal
A Goal b tho end toward which effort b directed. Program goals should be clearly stated and roaliatb. Objectives are the
intermediate effects or resoles to be achieved by the program in pursuing its ukimm goal Objectfves represerrt the macro by
which program managers determine the extent program gosh era beirq aooompfished. k b imperative that objectives be both
achievable and measurable. Like goals, objective should be stated in terms a( outcome (expected effects or resoles).
The most important step to understanding a program's impkmerrtatbn, however, b t}r knowledge gained by identifying Program
activities that are expected to produco results which meet the stated goals and objectives. The program must have a realistic
chance of attaining its specified goals and objectives, k k b m be implemented. Therefore, tho cause-and-affect relatbnshlp
between program aciivties and goals and objectives moat be idemfied and eaasesed.
Finally, the presentation of performance ind'x:ators provides us wkh a means for judging if the overall program or arty of ks
vkies cook! realistically ba implemented in a diMerem bcatbn, or under daferem circumatarxrea.
OJP FORM 4370/1 (Rev. fi-92)
: /~y.~~. 1~{pa1511Y1$ O~~.ilt~! i^s' k ,4 . z
: ~pY Of~WlK7t iPlt~itAS A''i"'~"",xly` ?P
ICY S~'~' k' ~
~ttl'aaY.Ot ~~1ftGh~ ~ ~ .1~,~29 " '
,pAOQAESS;REPORT «3qt M
PART H -PUAPGSE'ApEA 2. 'tL'ttHil~::TASK ~'IRS~, pA.
QE's _ . +~,(i.•.•
5.. rrsons Arrested by RacerEthniciry and Selected Characteristics (M detailed IMormation a not availeble, list totab as
appropriate.)
Sex Aoe (n veers) Criminal History
Repeat
Racer£thnictty Mate Female <t8 18+ First Offender Offender Unkrawn
Caucasian 14 14
Black
Hispanic 6 6 6
Native American
Other 22 7 29 1~ It
Unknown
Total 42 21 0 63
6a. Amount of Drugs Removal (Estimate weights if necessary. Soo instnutions for drug type definitions.)
Quantity Standard Unit Attemate UnM of
Drug Typa of Measuro Measuro
Cocaine 1.0 kg oz .
Crack kg
Cannabis 3.9 bs
Opiates 12.9 kg 8m .
Stimulants DU
Depressarrts DU
Hallucinogens DU
Muhiple/other drugs kg
wwn kg
6b. K marijuana was eradicated, indicate number of plants desVOyed.
84, 6~ Sinsemiila Wild (d'RCnwead)
Hydroponics _ Other
7. Assets Seizure and Forfeuures B. Distnbutbn of Forfeiture Proceeds
Secures Forfeituros ~9~ t0 project LQQY. to other entities
Asset Type Number Value Number Value 9. Does the project inducts spacialN
Vehicles asspned prosecutorial etatl4-YM
Vessas
Alroran
Currency (ft of inadents)
Other financial instruments
Real property
Weapons 5 90U
Other
Total
B1-5
' ~ Lg HSZ. ~zl p ~ ' L:,;': y e Y~ ""3' Sy" c'^
/~y~ S
? ~YFMY p~:y~{ratlberr~/11{1i11Dl~'. ~u. a . os'~;,"n
uj tie / L v~yrgx~«i
~$~11~000C ~f W~at ~'a
P. Lr a
- PART 8 - PURPOSE AAER ~=5,•••••iR~A•••••~SaGTtOIiAL::.~ K j`FAO: _ , .,r,,-
10a. Comided Persona by Drug Offense and by Druq•Releted Activ'dy (ff detailed Inforrttuion le not avdleble, Est fatale as
appropriate. Sea instructions about applying hierarchy rules to the table's rows and columns baton eMerinq this data.)
Offense Type Buying Cuhivatn, DistlShc Possessn. Transprtn. Using Other Total
Cocaine (Statistics are not available)
Crack
Cannabis
Opiates
Stimulants
Depressants
Halludnogens
Multiple/other drugs
Unknown drugs
Total
6 L x ~ ,:.5
F'
10b. Persons Convicted by Drug Offense and by Violem f` ~ , ~ ,
Offense (Indicate the number of persons receiving guilty ~ `z - ~ ~ar~> a,,,~
verdicts by type of offense.) " " ~ 9
f 5...._ ap J,
Vblern Nonviolent Total ~ c~,s~< ~
Drug (Statistics not availaba 1ej ~ s;
Nondrug ~
~h :
Total s
z
t ?arsons Sentenced by Drug Offense and by Type of Sentence (ff detailed Information le not available, tlst totals as
appropriate. Sae instructions about applying hierarchy rules to the table's rows and columns beforo eMerinq this data.)
Offense Type Prison Jail Prabatbn Jail and Probatbn
Number Median Number Median Number Median Number
Cocaine ~tistir~ not ay3j13111e)
Crack
Cannabis
Opiates
Stimulems
Depressants
Halludnogens
Muhiple/other drugs
Unknown drugs
ToW Persons
ttb. Pennons Semenced by Offense Type (ff detailed information is not available, list totsle ffi appropriaU.)
Offense Type Prison Jail Probation Jatl and Probatbn
Number Median Number Median Number Median Number
Drugoffernesony Statistics not availableL_
Drug-related vbfent
offenses
Nondrug violent
offenses
r r offenses
r Persons
B1-6
1?s.iQ~piea+ttu?te>t~lttuioa~>r~~~`"` p~':
~p'~, '3*'
~ r~^` „ R
~)y~ ty:,~ ~ f I Mf:..
t~K ~ ~"~'a!a^ ~ . I
' ~ ~
`a i
PART 8 - PURPCf3E AREA R. !Hll:. ,FCs ~ f., . Q``
1 2ersons Semenad by Drug Offonse Type and by Type of Santana -Continued (h detailed iMormation is not available, list
totals es appropriate. See instructions about appyinq hierarchy rules to the table's rows and columns before entering thb data.)
Offense Type Suspended Other Community Service Fines Total
Number Number Number Average Number Average Number
Cocaine _,~Statistics not availabl1_-
Craok
Gnnabis
Opiates
Stimulants
Depressants
Halludnogens
Muftiple/other drugs
Unknown drops
Total Persons
12b. Persons Sentenced by Offense Type - Continued (K detailed information is not available, list totals as appropriate.)
Offense Type Suspended Other Community Serv'~co Fines Total
Number Number Number Average Number Average Number
Drugottensesony (Statistics not ava11ab1~_
Drug-related violent
offenses
Nondrug violent
nHenses
1 • offenses
Tonal Persons
NOTES: (Enter any qualifying or explanatory information for the preceding responses that should bt noted. Pkase idemily to
which questions each note applies.)
BI-1
Approved:OM6 NO. 1121-0113 (EXPIRES 12-31-65)
e w1 ~
17.S.tJspartrrtyttt W. 2~{Sp~YYi Y w~`,~X~ Y ~ ,
p:
t~l~lllf~t~~t W.N~.YtYv~ ?~~yr~i~r~~~ QMO.~ H•<~C.w YM 'S .~wy„
bureau Ot JlnBoe Aaaia~la i w. ~3 Y~3 M fG
.::.pROORIESSREPOAT..--:-'=~'^"ay"''..."" k r~ ;...N. o .
'
PART B • PURPOSE AREA S: TAROETlNQ COMEBTiC SOUACSS '
Full Program Tif/a: Programs designed to target the domestic aotutxt o/ canhofled and ileQai aubatarroa, strh as precursor
chemicals, diversified pharmaeytrtieah, dandystinne laboratories, and cannabis c:rfWatlon
Unless speeHieally regwsted, proper adlvhles such as arnats and comkUons should only fndude thow occurring
durlnp the currant nporting period (whkh may be either ¦ quarterly or sn annual sport} Except for multiply dtoice
questbns, blank emries will be imerpreted as zerws. Eater an 'M• fa mhsing or uNknown data. For addlUonal help k
completing this form, check the attached Instrudbns.
State Cods: _ Project Gram is 93-DB-12 Fed. Focal Yyar. 1g_ Report Stan Oate: (momh/yea) O1 /1995
1. B Federal agendas are involved in this 2. The prindpal target(s) d this 3. The project's inveetigatbn outcomes:
project, check all of the folbwing that apply: project b (check all that apply)
L)4 ATF ~ INS ~ cannabis cul[Natbns Investigatbn Outcomes Results
i d licertseahegisirama
? Coast Guard ~ IRS p diverted pharmaceuticals
p Customs O LECC ? dandostine laboratories i d arrests made
~ DEA QL' U.S. Attorney ? precunor chemicals i d indidmems received
i d licer>suro actbns
? FAA Q(7 U.S. Marshals Service p other (apedfy) taken
o FBI o Other
4. For clandestine lab projects one, sport 6. For marijuana eradication projects, indicate the folbwirq outcomes:
on project outcomes CuMNeted
vstigation Outcomes Results Eradication Outcomes Sensimiila Other Ditehweed
d Tabs investigated i d pots sgMed 3 , 387
i d labs shut down i d pots eradicated 3.387
i d plams eradicated 84.67 B
5. M project includes oomrolling precursor i d gnenhouaelutdoor
chemicals, has a precursor chemical operatbns seized 1
tracking system been devebped: Iba d bulk/proeesaed 3.9#
Yes No _ Being devebped manjuana seized
7. Training activity resuhs fie. Does this project contain a public awannesa/media componym7•YM _
• d 8b. M 'Yes' m Ba, please indicate which d the following eiemema are util'~zed
Training redpiems persons (chedk all that apply):
law emorcemem staff 16 Publk service announcemems _ Hotline for receipt d information
regulatory staff X Reward program ~ Pubik information/disaeminalbn
prosewronal staff _ Other.
dher.
9. Number d sneers by type of charge 10. List the total number and value d sexed and forfeited nondnq assets
Seized Forfoited
• d Number i Valw Number S Value
Charge types arrosta Mdor whiles
cannabis cuhivatbn 18 VyssNs
livened pharmaceuticals Aircraft
clandestine labs Curroney (incidems)
precursor chemicals Other financial
muhiple/other charges 4~_ irtstromems
Real Property 900
Weapons
Other
OJP FORM 43102 (REV. 8-92) gl-g
Approved OMB NO. 1121-0113 (EXPIRES 12-31-g5)
yC . ~ /Vy~~~~a~~~~
~~tyyer~~~ ~ w ~a ~ a, > +~'&Y' q `4~"9 ` ~ °'%ax K~:.
K
tlM /
s Sw f, Q~gN:MWM F'tt7Qr~fllf 1~H ~ "'i s ~ ` r:
s. .k F`'~t1fe ~'$fS os~~'
it
c' - c .z" ~~p/~p~~ ~Y.' +~.t' %G' .'fi'b`
, . `PART B - pURFOSite'~RE~+4'i1tR.71~11~ISD1CII0i+1l11.."C"AgK. WRCLSx _ .R:
L
FuY Program Tifle: Muhijurisdictional task lonz programs which integrate Fedan~ sfaro, and krcal dnp law srdoroement
agerx:ies and prosecutors !or the purpose o! enhancirp inrorageney ooordinaton and inntelligerxae and /aa7ltatinp muhryurbdic4ond
imrosagetions.
Unless speeHtalty requested, project actlvkiss such ss arrests and eonvbtlons should only kteluds those occurring
during the wrrsm reporting period (whbh may bs efthsr a quarterly or an annual report). Except for muftfple choice
questions, blank entries will be interpreted ae zeroes. Enter an 'M' for missing or unknown data Fot sddttlonal help ti
completing this form, check the attached Instructbna
State Code: Project Grant R: 93-DB-12 Fed. Fiscal Year: 19_ Report Stan Date: (momftyear) O1 /19 95
1. M Federal agencies are involved in this project, ehedk all of 2. Please rank the project's too three priorities from the tolbwirp
the following boxes that apply: with a '1' as lion prbrity to a '3' as third priority:
ATF ? INS 3 Distrbutbn -Importation
? Coast Guard ~ IRS -Street sales Money laundering
Financial backing 2 Manulacturinq
? Customs ? LECC 1 Crop cultivation _ ORicial corruption
~ DEA ~ U.S. Attorney -Diversion -Gang adiv'Ry
V•akrtt crime
? FAA IXl U.S. Marshals Service -Otfwr (list)
? FBI ? Other (list)
3a Project Investigatbn Activity 3b. Investigation Status at End of Reporting Period
• of Caae Status • d cases
a Cases during Reporting Period cases Cbsed during reponing period 57
..,.dated beforo reporting period starting date (1 Dropped during reporting period
Initiated during reporting period ~ Pending at end of reporting period
Total active saes rL Total 5~
4a. Persons Anested for Drug OMenses by Type W Offense and by Drug•Related Adiv'tty (B detailed information is not available,
list totals as appropriate. Sea instructions about applying hierarchy rules to the table's rows and columns before entering this
data )
OMense Type Buying Cuttivatn. Dist./Sell Posseasn. Transprtn. Using Other Total
Cocaine 1 4 5
Cradle
Cannabis 14 4 15 33
Opiates
Stimulams
Depressams
Halludnogens
Multiple/other drugs
Unknown drugs
Total 1 14 8 15 38
4b. Persons Arrested by Drug Offense and by V'wkrri a~~Y~ ' ~
Offense .
Violent Nonviolent Tolal ~~~s", ~
Drug 38 ~ (
Taal Persons ~ r . "~.xM ~''~.'a
OJP FORM 43102 (REV. 8.92) 131-4