My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0370.004 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0370.004 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 9:06:50 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:28:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0370
Point
004
Author
Christopher J. Yuen, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
N/A
Document Relationships
BIL 159 Draft 02 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
BIL 160 Draft 03 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0370.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF <br /> Page 3 <br /> May 20, 2003 <br /> light, or donate land for a park, or widen a road. The findings should be accompanied by <br /> a reason for the conditions: for example, "to limit the potential impact of increased <br /> density on the road system." <br /> We should have some clear reason for imposing special conditions that limit the uses that <br /> can be made of a property after rezoning. The basic premise behind zoning is that land is <br /> <br /> ~~o zonirZg distric fin the districrt are ~ampatilsl~- <br /> Especially in commercial and light industrial areas, businesses demand some flexibility in <br /> the future uses of a site. It should not become the norm that a rezoning is specific to a <br /> certain project. <br /> The public expects us to look carefully at specific zoning proposals and to have <br /> conditions suitable for the site. There are many unique questions that come with various <br /> sites. At the same time, we need to stress that although a developer may come in with a <br /> specific proposal, the rezoning, unless limited, will ordinarily allow a much broader <br /> range of uses. <br /> There will be situations where a highly specific rezoning is desirable both for the <br /> applicant and the community, and we should recognize that this is one of the tools that <br /> we have in the Planning Department to make zoning fit overall community goals. In such <br /> cases, we may have a rezoning ordinance that is very much tailored to allow only a <br /> specific project. <br /> Rezoning conditions that limit the uses that can ordinarily be made of a property creates <br /> an administrative problem within the Planning Department in reviewing various kinds of <br /> subsequent applications, such as building permits or plan approvals. Staff cannot simply <br /> assume that all the uses allowed in the zoning code are allowed on the property in <br /> question. This means that staff must read the rezoning ordinance, at least when the <br /> property is designated as "conditional zoning" in the zoning maps or GIS. This is not the <br /> ideal situation but there is no way around it; most rezonings in the past twenty years <br /> contain significant conditions that must be met before the zoning becomes fully effective, <br /> such as infrastructure requirements or incremental zoning conditions, even if they do not <br /> actually restrict the uses. <br /> The county has also made it a practice that the ordinance requires that certain restrictions, <br /> like the limitation on additional dwellings, be placed as covenants in deeds. This is <br /> useful to provide notice to a purchaser that the possibility of additional dwellings, that <br /> might normally go with the rezoning, does not exist under the ordinance. I would not <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.