COM 0314.074 1996-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

consequences. But we will have [o apply ourselves with a resolve [narked by continuing education for our citizens, the determination to resist politicians who traffic in drug hysteria while coaunitting all manner of un-righteous acu, personally taking junkets, and lobbyist moneys, while they chap up and destroy the precious protections granted by the bill of rights., and the patience and compassion to treat individuals caught in the grip of illegal dntgs. The metaphor of a "waz on drugs" is misleading. Wars are expected to end. Addressing drug prohibition is a wntinuous challenge; the moment we believe otuselves to be victorious and free to relax our resolve, tyranny will rise again. Furthermore, the United States should not wage war on its citizens, many of whom aze the victims of [his Drug Waz. These individuals must be helped, not defeated. It is the deniers of civil rights, both foreign and domestic, who must be thwarted. A more appropriate analogy for The Waz on Some People Who Use Certain Drugs is cancer. Dealing with cancer is a long-term proposition. Decreasing The War on Some People Who Use Certain Drugs in America is a difficult task.. The duty of the federal government is to help communities overcome the consequences of [he war on some drugs. Ultimately, each American must make his or her own decision about whether stop The Waz on Some People Who Use Certain Drugs or not because it will take American resolve to restore what an bloated and out of control drug waz bureaucracy has done to our basic freedoms. When they took the fourth amendment, I was quiet because I don't deal drugs. When they took the six amendment, I was quiet because I'm innocent. When they took the second amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun. Now they've taken the Hrst amendment and I can't say anything at all. the above is a setting right of the Governments rhetoric found at http: //www. ncj rs. org/htm/chapter l . htm#overview