Laserfiche WebLink
,-2n-ill: 4[4PGM: V.in Fer'rii HOF 3L56t 85 # 4: N <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> COUNTY OF li[AWAH PLANNDYCi DEPARTME^l'[' <br /> Page tluee <br /> 7uly 22, 2003 <br /> Douter also seeks to allow wedcsngs of some undefined type. Looking at the way <br /> the fountain pool/waterfall pavilions is built leads one to believe that it was <br /> specifcally constructed for weddings and the like. Douter seeks an exception for <br /> "non-commercial weddings" without a definition of what that means. Does this mean <br /> that weddings paid for in Japan or E(a~raii to wcddinK organs=.seions, such that there is <br /> no fee paid by the couple directly to Douter, (e.g. Douter gets their fees from <br /> somebody else), are "non-commercial"'? If the wedding pazty pays Douter for a tour <br /> and fo~~d service; without a line it,:trt charge for use nt' the pavi]inn ac a tyrtjjr <br /> jng <br /> location, but has the wedding there nonetheless, does this mean it was a "non- <br /> <br /> . commercial" wedding. Since Douter is a huge organization with a huge number of i <br /> employees, can there be large numbers o:f these employees, their relatives, friends and <br /> families participating in big weddings at itlte property such that Douter claims they're <br /> "non-commeroial"? Must the Plannurg Deparhnent oir aggrieved neighbors get into <br /> Douter's financial records to try to determine what's commercial and what's not? <br /> Must the Counh~ or ne[ghbors be burdened with trying to define and determine <br /> whuch weddings are commercial"and ~°non-cornmerciai"? <br /> Douter cannot be trusted to act in good faint. Defutitions of events and weddings <br /> are subjective and can be exploited to the detriment of neighbors and the County. No <br /> events other than Kona Cot)'ee Fgggygl events durine the Festival itself and wedd <br /> nasi <br /> of Hawaii emplovees of Douter should be allowed. In ad Minn all liquor permits on a <br /> daily basis or anv other basis should be Qrohibited absalu.tely- regardless of the type of <br /> event or e1H ddine. The County and the neighbors ,;hould not be burdened by <br /> having to police and enforce other exceprion:rs. <br /> rv. pls." <br /> Whan Douteu applied for this hermit, it proposed "the retail sale of non- <br /> agricultural products such as t-shirts; postcards, utug~y macadamia nuts, cookies, <br /> candies, etc." That "etc." concerned us, as it could open the door for sales of almost <br /> anytnin;;. Thus we reached an agreement that food anti drink sales for consumption on ~ <br /> the premises would be prohibited. There is no present mention of that limiting factor ~ <br /> now by the Heating Officer's repnrt o:r Douter's exceptions. There should be a <br /> specific prohibition that the gacebo(s) or store(s) on the premises be specifically <br /> prohibited from the providing or sale of any food or drink for consumption on the <br /> premises, and no alcoholic beverages under any circumstances. <br /> <br />