COM 0438.020 2002-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

,-3G-Oa; 3: 5a PM; van Pern is. ;dOd 3296 i0° x q- e PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page five July 22, 2003 the subject of major litigation, being$ Douglas Scoufi~s et al. v~l ro Ine Pt ~ gj:, and its Arbitration O1-0287-A, now going into its third week of hearings. Rain water runoff accumulating on and conning across Mamalahoa there, at the Douter ~I' nrooerty locati4tl; is at issue! Additional Ixrtet~tial liability for t}te C_.onnty shnald nnr be part of this permit approval. See section 24 on page 9 of the Hearing Officer's report. Douter, without applications or pewits has been running large tour buses to and from their property in disregard and violation of applicable County regulations and I` ordinances for a long time. See section 18 on page 7 of the Hearing Officer's Findings. ~ Although the County cited Douter for such activities and violations on January 26, 27 28 and February 1, 2003, such activities, as observed by the undersigned, occurred much more frequently than that. Dquter's lack pf credibility and resneEt fnr the County's regulating powers and its neighbrns is thus demonstrated. t The undersigned uses Mam.alahoa Highway, passing by the Douter property, every school day morning to take his daughter to school, and often to take her home in ' the afternoon. tht one occasion, upon coming to the Douter property there was a large tour bus in the south bound lane, half on the highway and half off, with persons attempting to board the bus from the paved traffic lane, with someone trying to stop and direct the Mamalahoa traffc in both the northbound and southbound lanes. An accident was narrowly averted VI. StreetlfYhts , At page 13, in section 43(e) of the 1learing Officer's report. There is menfion of the installation of streetlights by Douter under certain conditions. Due to the topography w ure area, sue;n saeeuigrns coma oe yisiore and oriens+ve to our and omen stumugding properties, and contradictory Eo the rtual and private type of property we sought out and purchased. Streetlights should be prohibited under any circumstances. VQ. j~,ndscaotag to Prateet Nejp~j~,;;;, i The Hearing Officer at page 29, section 3 of her recommendations referred to "additional heavy landscaping" far the'~bundary of the Yokoyama property, TMK 7- 5-11:26, to the north. The property adjoining to the south, being, among others, our TMK 7-5-11:34, should receive the same treatment. We would have been in the contested case proceeding, but for the agreement reached with Douter to avoid our involvement in such a proceeding, a~td now apparently a.btcndorted. L'IIi.. ~'OneiiisiOri We believe Douter has„ by ig+tori ng archaeological considerations and requirements as referred to in the Hearing Officer's report, conducting a massive tour operation in