Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0140.049 2002-2004JAY T KIMURA yy pi M 34 RAINBOW DRIVE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY oo)lN'••"'�q� HILO, HAWAII 96720 CHARLENE Y. IBOSHI PH: 9610466 FAX: 961-8908 FIRST DEPUTY 934-3403 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 934-3603 "•.. WEST HAWAII UNIT P O. BOX 748 KEALAKEKUA, HAWAII 98750 OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY PH: 3222552 FAX: 322-6584 G� s DATE: February 19, 2004 TO: James Y. Arakaki Council Chair and Council Members s O �� FROM: Jav T�rmura RE: FINAL REPORT Name of Grant Program: Federal or State Grantor: County Grantee Department or Agency: Grant No. (IF KNOWN): Amount of Grant: Community Empowerment Organization (CEO) Federal Office of the Prosecuting Attorney 2001 -DD -BX -0029 $150,000.00 Amount of County Match: $0 Grant Period (Commencement & Completion): 2/01/01 - 7/31/03 Goals: To reduce crime and improve the quality of life in the community by empowering the community resident to feel more comfortable and less fearful in their communities and by providing community residents with knowledge and resources that can assist their community. Objectives: 1) Establish an island -wide CEO council 2) Develop community capacity 3) Provide leadership training for community members 4) Develop public awareness of safety issues and resources 5) Establish an island -wide communication network Outcomes or Results: See attached. Comm. No. Iq M Ref. To: Ref. Date � 3 Z�ad Forth FR 6/01 OMB APPROVAL NO. 1121-0253 EXPIRATION DATE: 09/30/2004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs CATEGORICAL/DISCRETIONARY ASSISTANCE PROGRESS REPORT —0 The information provided will be used by the grantor agency to monitor grantee cash flow to ensure proper use of Federal funds. No further monies or other benefits may be paid out under this program unless this report is completed and filed as required by existing law and regulations (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements — 28 CFR, Part 66, Common Rule, and OMB Circular A-110). E GRANTEE 2. AGENCY GRANT NUMBER 3. REPORT NO. County of Hawaii 2001 -DD -BX -0029 4. IMPLEMENTING SUBGRANTEE 5. REPORTING PERIOD (Data) FROM: 2/01/01 To: 7/31/03 6. SHORTTITLE OF PROJECT 7. GRANT AMOUNT S. TYPE OF REPORT REGULAR ❑ gmnJnity FSTgpowerment Organization $150, 000.00 REQUEST ® FINALREPORT 1 9. NAME AND TITLE OF PROJECT DIRECTOR 10. WGWATURE OF P OJ CTOR 11. DATE OF REPORT Charlene Iboshi, First De 7/31/03 12. COMMENCE REPORT HERE (Continue on plain paper) See Attached 13. CERTIFICATION BY GRANTEE (Official Signora 14. DATE (- 8/7/03 OJP FORM 4587/1 / ��- CATEGORICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRESS REPORT FY 1999 OPEN SOLICITATION GRANT PROGRAM Grantee: County of Hawaii Office of the Prosecuting Attorney Grant #: 2001 -DD -BX -0029 City/State: Hilo Hawaii Contact Person: Charlene Iboshi E-mail: hilopros(a interoac net Reporting Period (✓): X January 1 - Jane 30 (due July 30) _July 1 - December 31 (due January 30) FINAL REPORT JANUARY 2001 — JUNE 2003 INSTRUCTIONS: For each of the sections below, please describe your efforts during the reporting period. Use the information you provide in this report as the foundation to describe further activity and accomplishments in future reports. For instructions on submitting your progress report, please refer to the BJA progress report web page at www.ojp.usdoj/govfbja/disc-progreport.htrn or call your Program Manager. Section A: Project Status: 1. STAFFING — The Project Coordinator and nine district facilitators continued to work according,to the strategic plan for completion of the project. The facilitator's contracts ended 2-28-03, the Coordinator's contract ended on 4-30-03. Resource Team meetings were held quarterly and all facilitators had access to on-going skills development and a Resource Library. 2. PHYSICAL LOCATION. The project's physical location remained in the Kona office of the Prosecutor where office space, a computer, and supplies were provided. The Coordinator met monthly with the steering committee and bi-monthly with the Community Oriented Prosecutors in person and through video conferencing. The Coordinator met weekly with facilitators by phone, e-mail, and/or in person. 3. The Community Oriented Prosecutors and Steering Committee provided support to the Coordinator. With the Neighborhood Watch system as efficient and wide spread as it is, it was a natural resource group with which to build a communication network. The web page was located on the Hawaii County Prosecutor's own website with a link to the Hawaii County website. The steering committee provided an energetic and committed foundation for CEO activities and functioned as a "compass" to keep the vision clear. The committee was also helpful in drafting the final summary report. 4. TIME LINE. The time line and budget were modified and submitted to you on May 30, 2002. The project's momentum remained on track. 5. COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS. The project continued to collaborate with other County and State departments. The steering committee was composed of representatives from the County Police Department, Department of Research and Development, Planning Department and Office of Housing and Community Development; State Department of Health, Department of Labor, Workforce Development Division and Department of the Attorney General; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; Hawaii Community Foundation; and New Beginnings Alliance. In planning and executing the East and West Hawaii Kick -Off events, support was also provided by the Mayor's Office and the Kona-Kohala Chamber of Commerce. Other partners included the Hawaii Island Rural Health Association, the Mayor's Committee on Aging, the Hawaii Island Chapter of the Red Cross and the Community Voices Councils. New partners joined in during year two and included Hawaii Island Civil Defense and Hawaii County Resource Center. All have offered time and expertise for grant writing, community education efforts and meeting spaces as needed. We also partnered with the Juvenile Justice Project, the Community Oriented Prosecution project, and the grass roots Neighborhood Watch team, Solutions 2002. Gathering collaborators was an on-going commitment. 6. SUSTAINABILITY. The CEO concept and framework have been an excellent means of obtaining direct input from community members to government on issues of health and safety. Several District Teams developed task forces with Environment Management, Parks and Recreation, Department of Public Works and Corporation Counsel. Each included a component for on-going community responsibility for certain functions. With the arising issues surrounding homeland security and the need for citizen involvement , this will be an especially innovative approach for the future. The Mayor, Department of Water, and Police Department have utilized our facilitators for assistance with public meetings and other departments have expressed interest. The Hawaii County Council was receptive to the Coordinator's testimony on various issues, knowing the information represented an island wide sampling of community opinion. It'currently appears that a number of the task forces and collaborative relationships will continue after the project is completed and will continue to work on mutual issues. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS. We continued to tap the expertise and resources within the steering committee for training and evaluation, as well as utilizing the talents of our district facilitators. Outside training emphasized facilitation skills, mediation skills and the elements of preparation of a Power Point presentation. Each facilitator was issued an easel, pens, tape, and easel paper for their own use. Each facilitator was also given a copy of "The Tipping Point" by Malcom Gladwell and had on-going access to the Resource Library and any pertinent publications and data available in print or on the Internet. The lack of Microsoft Publisher software was a hardship as outside sources had to be used to compile the newsletter. Hawaii County computer system has dial up Internet service with very slow downloading ability, and Prosecutor's Kona Office had no color printer. Section B: Goals and Intended Outcomes: 1. PROJECT GOAL: Reduce crime and improve the quality of life in the community by: a) Empowering the community resident to feel more comfortable and less fearful in their communities, whereby the community will become more willing to participate in community life, including reporting crimes b) Providing community residents with knowledge and resources that can assist their community. Based on our wrap up survey using the Key Informant System, (see enclosed survey results) we appear to have been moderately successful in the area of community education about understanding police work and the workings of the justice system. Many community members did feel strongly that individuals can make a difference in their neighborhoods which was one of our major emphasis. OBJECTIVES: a) Establish an island -wide CEO council Members of the CEO council, ultimately referred to as the Resource Team, met in September 2002, December 2002 and February 2003 to continue to collaborate on and identify issues of island -wide concern. Formalized agreements were signed to indicate commitment to the project by both government and community members. b) Develop community capacity by: l) establishing local area CEO community councils; and 2) encouraging the active participation of community organizations and citizens in efforts to prevent and report crime. Informing the public of the CEO project through community meetings was the first step. Groups were encouraged to participate in project efforts to prevent and report crime and actively work to improve the health and safety of their community. An island wide Abandoned Car Task Force was formed and remains active.Three new mobile Neighborhood Watch groups were formed in rural areas of various districts on each side of the island; new, stricter, lease language regarding eviction is in process based on community input and assistance from the Hawaii County Prosecutor's Office to the Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estate land managers to curb drug growing/selling/manufacture on their agricultural land island wide. Friends of the Park and community groups, in conjunction with Parks and Recreation are planning and have implemented some County Park improvements to prevent late night noise and illegal/ underage drinking with material and assistance from the department. c) Providing leadership training for community members Training topics continued to arise during community meetings so educational sessions continued. Several sessions of SARA Problem Solving Training, How a Search Warrant Is Written, What Do Street Drugs Look Like? and presentations on Juvenile Drug Court were completed for the interested communities. Facilitators and district team participants have attended Domestic Violence Advocacy training, Fundraising "how to" sessions. We were committed to on-going training as topics arose. Many communities now know which resources to contact for trainings and presentations and are comfortable doing so. The Prosecutor's Office and the Community Policing Department will remain the liaisons for this. d) Develop public awareness ofsafety issues and resources The district facilitators actively assisted their district teams to identify and work on issues specific to their communities and to engage the appropriate private and public decision makers in the process. It became clear that the communities with active, visible Community Policing Officers and involved community associations feel more empowered to report crime and stay involved. e) Establish an island -wide communication network As an outgrowth of the Solutions 2002 conference, there is now a Neighborhood Watch e-mail list which is currently at 400 addresses and expanding daily. CEO utilized this as an information distribution system for upcoming training and as a mechanism for direct feedback. Video conferencing with many of these neighborhood groups was held periodically at four sites simultaneously around the island. This mechanism remains available through the Prosecutor's Offices in both Hilo and Kona. The North Kohala facilitator published a newsletter specific to CEO activities for all facilitators to contribute to which was published and distributed through the Prosecutor's Office to approximately 130 people and organizations.(see enclosed copies) Section C. Data Collection Efforts: Measure Number Data Source Performance Indicator: 1) Number of hours/content of training received by Facilitators SARA problem solving training 4 hrs Hawaii Co. Community Policing Officers Facilitation Training #1 6 hrs Hawaii County Staff Facilitation Training #2 6 hrs Dr. Ray Oshiro Power Point Presentations 6 hrs Univ. Hawaii Cont. Education Strategic Planning #1 7 Ins State Department of Health Strategic Planning #2 3 hrs Hawaii County Staff Conflict Resolution 6 his West Hawaii Mediation Center Methods of Mediation 6 Ins West Hawaii Mediation Center Search Warrant Procedure 2 hrs Hawaii County Prosecutor 2) Building community awareness and participation 8 Newsletters published/distributed community groups 3 Radio PSA's 5 Television Interviews Number of media efforts 2 In depth articles in 2 local newspapers 10 Press releases in 3 local newspapers 9 Posters announcing meetings 1 In depth article County Newsletter 2 PSA's Mayor's email newsletter 2 PSA's Solutions 2002 email newsletter Number of community meetings held, frequency by district: Puna 11 South Hilo 7 Hamalcua 13 North Hilo 11 North Kona 38 South Kona 13 South Kohala 18 North Kohala 9 Kau 20 Number of participants and their characteristics 823+ Sign in sheets indicate majority are NHW Monthly 12 members, community association members, „ 10 business owners, some agency personnel, CPO's and faith based groups. Concerned Topics of Community Education Meetings: 3 parents and elderly people were especially SARA problem solving 12 interested in the drug abuse and vice Search Warrant Process presentations.Many community meetings did Community Teams Training 50+ not have consistent sign in, estimate over 1,000 Domestic Violence/Child Abuse Awareness people attended at various times. Drug Recognition/Addiction 3 Resource Team Meetings with CEO district Juvenile Justice/Drug Court council members, facilitators, county Landlord/Tenant Regulations department heads to review accomplishments Levels of Trespass penalties and form new task forces based on defined Crime Prevention for home and business unsolved issues. Teams will continue after the Number of community meetings attended by Coord. 47 Original Coordinator attended approximately 20 community meetings and 2 large Kick Off presentations. Subsequent Coordinator attended 21 community meetings, gave testimony to County Council 2 times and presentations to 4 community associations. 3) Improving communication network 8 CEO newsletters published/distributed. Monthly 12 Meeting of facilitators/Steering Committee. 10 Coordinator met with Community Police, Community Oriented Prosecutors. 3 Updates in Mayor's email newsletter 12 Regular meeting of district facilitators with their district teams. Weekly 50+ Informal contact by phone, email between facilitators and coordinator. Quarterly 3 Resource Team Meetings with CEO district council members, facilitators, county department heads to review accomplishments and form new task forces based on defined unsolved issues. Teams will continue after the project ends. Section D: System Changes and/or Program Effects: Through the planning process, it was identified that the communication framework being established in each district has potential to address issues beyond safety and health following completion of the project. Issues such as recreation, economic development and community planning could also be addressed by these district teams. However, since we are requesting non-traditional input from the community and non-traditional interaction from government, we focused on simple strategies which were likely to experience success. By providing well thought out input to decision -makers, these district teams were able to promote a bottoms up approach to resolving issues and concerns. By clearly stating the community's role and commitment to the solution, the potential exists to change the way government does business on the Big Island. Issues that impact most local communities such as illegal dumping, noise, and abandoned vehicles were a realistic starting point for these quarterly meetings to begin the process of cooperation and trust. Some county departments, Parks and Recreation and Environmental Management as examples, have expressed enthusiasm for the caliber of interaction this has provided to them. Those communities with strong Neighborhood Watch chapters and Community Policing Officers have already grasped this concept, so our emphasis was to encourage new watch groups to form and for community groups of all kinds to begin thinking of ways to participate in public safety issues. There are several communities, particdlarly in rural areas, who have begun efforts to combat drug use and delinquency by meeting together, meeting with school staff and police, and beginning to plan what will be best for their own unique situations. During our meetings around the island we began to identify and encourage the "natural leaders" in the community and have incorporated them into the facilitation process whenever possible. Section E: Other Information: Please include any other information you deem relevant to reporting your progress The project accomplished and met the goals and objectives in spite of some early setbacks. The initial premise that community can help government be creative has been shown to be possible. The need for community education on a regular basis at the neighborhood level is critical. Contact with government at that level develops and maintains trust and "buy in" to the process of cooperative action.. Working in communities is an exciting and challenging endeavor and requires much honing of communication skills on all levels. Enclosures: 9 District Facilitator Graphs 8 Newsletters Survey Results CEO COMMUNITY CHANGES SOUTH KONA: One NHW Mobile Patrol formed. Change in lease language by Kamehameha Schools to clarify consequences of drug activity by leasees. Formed an Abandoned Vehicle Task Force which formulated procedural changes in conjunction with county departments. NORTH KONA: Developed and carried out a comprehensive study of Alii Drive which is in use as a resource by both community and county. Assisted residents of Ka Hale Kahalu'u Housing in developing their first Resident Council and expediting building repairs and maintenance. SOUTH KOHALA: Brought United Way 211 information system to Hawaii Island NORTH KOHALA: Established county -wide newsletter for dissemination of safety and crime information. HAMAKUA: Applied for and received a State Incentive Grant for Honokaa School Complex which will provide continued support to the CEO project in Hamakua and Waimea. NORTH HILO: One new NHW formed. Established alternate route system of county roads for police and fire to use in unexpected state road closures in Laupahoehoe area. SOUTH HILO/PUNA: Combined effort formed an Illegal Dumping Task Force to work with community, county departments and major land owners to increase responsible stewardship of large areas of vacant lands. KAU: One new NHW started Gathered participants and facilitated the process of Hookena-Naalehu Water Master Plan meetings for County Dept of Water Supply. Gated a road near Kau High School to prevent late night nuisance. Collaborative effort with DOE, Parks and Rec and DPW , with volunteers to monitor and lock. 011 50 40 30 20 Community Actions 2002-2003 Q00�9� $ Hamakua -w- Ka'u North Hilo --x-South Hilo -*-North Kohala -South Kohala North Kona —South Kona —Puna 000 Q00�9� $ Hamakua -w- Ka'u North Hilo --x-South Hilo -*-North Kohala -South Kohala North Kona —South Kona —Puna M 14 12 10 D R 4 2 0 Community Changes 2002-2003 6 act - 0 Hamakua -f- Ka'u North Hilo -*--South Hilo * North Kohala -*-South Kohala + North Kona ---South Kona --Puna 30 25 20 15 5 'J PLANNING PRODUCTS 2002-2003 QO�Ja,A - namaKua t Ka'u North Hilo South Hilo -*—North Kohala -e South Kohals a North Kona --South Kona --- Puna 16 14 12 10 It7 It. 4 2 0 ! d'' I , 0 d SERVICES PROVIDED 2002-2003 t ac41 t c 0�' p ?p Q0 O 0 Hamakua t Ka'u North Hilo * South Hilo —*—North Kohala —South Kohala +North Kona —South Kona --Puna M 50 40 30 o 10 Hamakua Community Actions and Community Changes ZE 2 0��aA °� PQt baa °c0 ���� P�Jy� dc� `°p°� , ��� ��� ' c-'0 0�ac1 +--[�—Community Actions f Community Changes r i>— t� "b Lk 0��aA °� PQt baa °c0 ���� P�Jy� dc� `°p°� , ��� ��� ' c-'0 0�ac1 +--[�—Community Actions f Community Changes ou 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ���or �o �a� c0 ��A PJ��e` `0r OU�o�Ot ,0��� cP��� cJac1 O'o0ac1 �0 00 Q Ka'u Community Actions and Community Changes 2002-2003 -6 Community Actions -t-Community Changes 25 20 15 10 5 51 North Hilo Community Actions and Community Changes 2002-2003 mai �a(or ��.� �a� 'Jce �J� P�`"c �oo4 ,0��& �� acJacica 0 F 5mQ �o p0 Q0 —* Community Actions —*—Community Changes Y 2 t` tf `i l { a Y IK mai �a(or ��.� �a� 'Jce �J� P�`"c �oo4 ,0��& �� acJacica 0 F 5mQ �o p0 Q0 —* Community Actions —*—Community Changes 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 North Kohala Community Actions and Community Changes 2002-2003 OcP0 e Q�o O)scJ �e �Q O Community Actions —a—Community Changes 45 40 35 u 25 20 15 10 5 U North Kona Community Actions and Community Changes 2002-2003 aK�act �aA °°0 �yA �` eka Q� �F Oc} [,o�al� Oho �a eke — t Community Actions f Community Changes 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Puna Community Actions and Community Changes 2002-2003 11 & a Q ow OF F c1 c1O "Poe 0 OJa pcQ0 "Poe �O� Actions �-f-*—Cj—o—mmunity munity Changes 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 South Hilo Community Actions and Community Changes 2002-2003 --*--Community Actions —n— Community Changes y .t •y.f a..y h+'.. � +. ^ 9a e 'R A5 HS ♦ �YM. .� a,IX wF r . of X � 3 Joe --*--Community Actions —n— Community Changes 40 30 20 10 0 South Kohala Community Actions and Community Changes 2002-2003 c�A eSS �a� °c0 ��� °gam tib& t°00` � �� c�&A � eke — o Community Actions —n— Community Changes -Rl 50 40 30 10 0 414� Q ��� �Qm S3 South Kona Community Actions and Community Changes 2002-2003 Q� �Q��� OG o m ��® �a -e<z g O -- * Community Actions --*—Community Changes • •